Skip to content

Minnesota · Public charity

Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild

To promote and enhance increasing populations of indigenous wild sheep on the north american continent, to safeguard against the decline or extinction of such species, and to fund programs for professional management of these populations, keeping all administrative costs to a minimum.

$94k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
2
Itemized grants FY2024
2
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$84k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$74,200
Largest grant, FY2024
$74,200
Organizations funded a year
2 to 11
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$1.5M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild funded were first-time grantees, receiving 13% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving2$84k50%
FY20232$230k50%
FY20223$106k67%
FY20215$541k0%
FY202011$349k64%
FY20195$489k20%
FY20187$255k29%
FY20176$188kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$2.2MPhilanthropy$205kHealth$32kEnvironment$4kRecreation & Sports$3k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
MN
OR
WY
SD
CA
CO
NE
AZ
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Wild Sheep Foundation$470,05082%
Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Inc$37,20022%
Telonics Inc$31,7871n/a
South Dakota State University$30,9901n/a
Coloradans for Responible Wildlife Management$10,00011%
Rocky Mountain Bighorn Society$10,00015%
The Trust for Public Land$4,00010%
Nebraska Game and Parks Commission$3,3704n/a
Texas Bighorn Society$1,00010%

Plus 11 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.6M), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild?

Find your warmest path to Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild

How much does Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild give?
Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild reported 2 itemized grants totaling $84,200, out of $94,200 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 11 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Animals (90%), Philanthropy (8%), Health (1%).
Who are Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Wild Sheep Foundation ($470k), Arizona Desert Bighorn Sheep Inc ($37k), Telonics Inc ($32k).
Does Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild based?
Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild is based in MN.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Minnesota-Wisconsin Chapter Foundation for North American Wild’s filings →

More from the funding graph