Skip to content

· Public charity

Minnesota Section Pga Foundation

To support junior golfers and provide financial assistance for worthy recipients to attend college.

$264k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$66k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$644kPublic Benefit$71kHealth$15kEmployment$15kCivil Rights$15kEducation$10kEnvironment$9k
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $133,494, the rows itemized in this filing. The $263,551 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $130,057 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
$9,449
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION$66,305
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC$19,805
CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS$15,714
PURPLE HAWK JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION$9,449
BARRIER FREE GOLF INC$7,000
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #271$5,221
LEWIS SPORTS FOUNDATION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%BARRIER FREE GOLF INC: $12k → 5%PROACT INC: $15k → 6%PURPLE HAWK JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%MINNESOTA GOLF CHARITY EVENTS: $55k → 7%KIDS GOLF A PALOOZA LLC: $7k → 9%MINNEWASKA FAIRWAYS FORE ALL: $12k → 10%INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #271: $5k → 11%IND SCHOOL DIST 318 ITASCA COUNTY: $6k → 11%THE ARC MINNESOTA INC: $15k → 14%SHORT GOLF USA: $8k → 11%IMPACT FOUNDATION: $9k → 8%FARGO PARK DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $6k → 12%LEARNING LINKS OF CHASKA INC: $10k → 5%LIVING WELL DISABILITY SERVICES: $15k → 6%PURPLE HAWK JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION: $9k → 7%MINNEWASKA FAIRWAYS FORE ALL: $10k → 10%CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS: $18k → 11%BARRIER FREE GOLF INC: $7k → 5%PURPLE HAWK JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION: $7k → 7%MINNEWASKA FAIRWAYS FORE ALL: $10k → 10%MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION: $85k → 11%MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION: $83k → 11%MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION: $71k → 11%MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION: $66k → 11%MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION: $63k → 11%CITY OF EDINA: $8k → 11%LEWIS SPORTS FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $25k → 11%SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $24k → 11%SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $20k → 11%SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $14k → 11%CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS: $24k → 11%CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS: $24k → 11%CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS: $16k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$602k · 6 repeat orgs$177k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$602k
$162k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
-1%

Still filing today

50%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24
Recreation & SportsPublic BenefitEmploymentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MG
    MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $369k · revenue +43%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $83k · revenue +94%
  • MP
    MINNEAPOLIS PARK AND RECREATION BOARD
    3× · 2022–2024 · $63k

Funded once

  • MG
    MINNESOTA GOLF CHARITY EVENTS
    one grant, 2023 · $55k · revenue -96% · 100% of their budget
  • CO
    CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS
    2× · 2019–2020 · $18k
  • PI
    PROACT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mn Fighting Lions

Raise funds for handicap people to participate in sports activities

Recreation & Sports
2
Dirtbag Invitational Golf Tournament

Raise funds for the sole purpose of donating all proceeds to the special olympics of minnesota. this will be done through an annual golf tournament, 100% of all proceeds to be donated to the special olympics of minnesota.

—
3
Minnesota Golf Association Foundation

Use golf to do good. regardless of background or ability, every individual should have access to the life-changing benefits of the greatest game in the world. we want to share golf with everyone. the foundation uses golf to change lives.…

Education
4
Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors Foundation Inc
—
5
Friends of Minnesota Men's Gymnasti Mannon
Recreation & Sports
6
Minnesota Paralyzed Veterans of America

The minnesota paralyzed veterans of america (mnpva) a minnesota nonprofit organization, is an officially recognized paralyzed veterans of america chapter. mnpva assists veterans with spinal cord injuries or spinal cord diseases, such as ms…

—
7
Professional Golfers Association Mn Section

To promote the enjoyment and involvement in the game of golf and to contribute to the growth of the golf professional and the golf industry. the minnesota section will accomplish this mission by enhancing the skills of golf professionals…

—
8
Explore Minnesota Golf Alliance

Promotion of Minnesota as a Golf Destination. The member courses are a collection of must play courses located across the state.

Community Improvement
9
Our House of Minnesota Inc
—
10
The Sunshine Stop

Provides jobs to individuals with disabilities

Employment
11
National Sports Center Foundation

The foundation is dedicated to the development of amateur sports by providing exceptional experiences at the national sports center for over four million people annually resulting in 85+ million dollars of tourism economic impact.

Recreation & Sports
12
Care in Action Minnesota

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of children who have experienced abuse or neglect, strengthen families and prevent childhood maltreatment, by providing timely crucial support that meets the basic needs of local families and…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minnesota Golf Charity Events; the most unlike its peers is Impact Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION INC: $369,029 · OtherMINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION INCSPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $83,279 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INCMINNEAPOLIS PARK AND RECREATION BOARD: $62,884 · OtherMINNEAPOLIS PARK AND RECREATION BOARDMINNESOTA GOLF CHARITY EVENTS: $55,000 · OtherMINNESOTA GOLF CHARITY EVENTSMINNEWASKA FAIRWAYS FORE ALL: $31,952 · OtherBARRIER FREE GOLF INC: $29,000 · OtherPURPLE HAWK JUNIOR GOLF FOUNDATION: $26,230 · Other+8 more: $82,571 · Other+8 morePROACT INC: $15,000 · EmploymentFargo Park District Foundation: $5,500 · Recreation & SportsLewis Sports Foundation: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsImpact Foundation: $9,265 · Public BenefitUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Other$739,945Employment$15,000Recreation & Sports$10,500Public Benefit$9,265Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION INC: $369,029 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC: $83,279 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMINNESOTA GOLF CHARITY EVENTS: $55,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetBARRIER FREE GOLF INC: $29,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetPROACT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLiving Well Disability Services: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARC MINNESOTA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetImpact Foundation: $9,265 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetFargo Park District Foundation: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLewis Sports Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MINNESOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA GOLF CHARITY EVENTS ↗
  • Who funds BARRIER FREE GOLF INC ↗
  • Who funds PROACT INC ↗
  • Who funds Living Well Disability Services ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC MINNESOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds Impact Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Fargo Park District Foundation ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Lewis Sports Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN14.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Minnesota Section Pga Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Minnesota Section Pga Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Minnesota Section Pga Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Minnesota Section Pga Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Minnesota Section Pga’s filings →

    More from the funding graph