Skip to content
Ministry With the Aging Dba Cathedral Gardens Apartments at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ministry With the Aging Dba Cathedral Gardens Apartments

To provide grants for the elderly and infirmed.

$469k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01FY2018 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $315,383, the rows itemized in this filing. The $469,413 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $154,030 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $220k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC HOUSING INITIATIVE-ST JUDE INC$60,000
JULIETTE FOWLER CHARITIES$60,000
AIDS SERVICES OF DALLASHOUSING PROGRAMS$50,000
RESOURCE CENTERGRAY PRIDE SENIOR SERVICES$50,000
COALITION FOR AGING LGBT$30,000
SENIORS PET ASSISTANCE NETWORK$20,000
TOWN OF LITTLE ELM$15,000
OURCALLING INC$15,000
CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION$10,000
EPISCOPAL DIOCESE OF DALLAS$5,383
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OURCALLING INC: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
03the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JULIETTE FOWLER FOUNDATION: $60,000 · OtherJULIETTE FOWLER FOUNDATIONPWA COALITION OF DALLAS INC: $50,000 · OtherPWA COALITION OF DALLAS INCTOWN OF LITTLE ELM: $15,000 · OtherTOWN OF LITTLE ELMEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE ASCENSION: $10,000 · OtherEPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE ASCENSIONDIOCESE OF DALLAS: $5,383 · OtherST JUDE INC: $60,000 · Housing & ShelterST JUDE INCRESOURCE CENTER OF DALLAS INC: $50,000 · HealthRESOURCE CENTER O…COALITION FOR AGING LGBT: $30,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION …SENIORS PET ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $20,000 · AnimalsOURCALLING INC: $15,000 · Human Services
Other$140,383Housing & Shelter$60,000Health$50,000Civil Rights$30,000Animals$20,000Human Services$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJULIETTE FOWLER FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetST JUDE INC: $60,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetRESOURCE CENTER OF DALLAS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPWA COALITION OF DALLAS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSENIORS PET ASSISTANCE NETWORK: $20,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetOURCALLING INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Texas Instruments Fou…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Dallas FoundationTX15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ministry With the Aging Dba Cathedral Gardens Apartments funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ministry With the Aging Dba Cathedral Gardens Apartments. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ministry With the Aging Dba Cathedral Gardens Apartments?

    Find your warmest path to Ministry With the Aging Dba Cathedral Gardens Apartments through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2020) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2018, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ministry With the Aging Dba Cathedral Gardens Apartments’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home