· Public charity
Miller-Dwan Foundation and Subsidiaries
The miller-dwan foundation improves the health of the people of our region through the creation of impactful community solutions that overcome barriers.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $653,605 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,233,547 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $579,942 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $86k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $118k
- $250k+1 grant · $449k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ESSENTIA HEALTH | $449,290 |
| THE GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $62,266 |
| COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA | $55,900 |
| NORTH LAKES COMMUNITY CLINIC | $24,634 |
| HGA | $16,650 |
| TRANS NORTHLAND | $15,000 |
| MN MASONIC CHILDRENS | $15,000 |
| MINNESOTA BALLET | $14,865 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $99k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
17 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EHESSENTIA HEALTH8× · 2017–2024 · $5.8M · revenue +123%
- LSLAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER4× · 2019–2022 · $130k · revenue +41%
- EIESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH4× · 2017–2022 · $116k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- AIASPIRUS IRON RIVER HOSPITAL & CLINICS INCone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +3%
- MAMN Alliance With Youth-Promise Fellowsone grant, 2018 · $20k
- RHRURAL HEALTH SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +33%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide a medical residency program, in conjunction with the university of minnesota, and supported by essentia health and aspirus st. luke's hospital of duluth, for the training of family medicine physicians in association with that…
We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…
Trinity health is committed to preserving and improving the quality of health of the people we serve. our mission is to excel at meeting the needs of the whole person through the provision of quality health care and health related services.
We are called to make a healthy difference in people's lives.
Benedictine living community - st. peter is a catholic organization entrusted with advancing the health care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. our mission is to witness to god's love by providing compassionate,…
We're here for your whole life to listen, then serve, to guide and heal because health means everything.
The mission of cerenity senior care's faith-based communities is to cultivate independence and dignity by empowering the people we serve through innovation, compassion and excellence.
We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…
We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…
We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating compassionate communities providing support…
See schedule o.the corporation was created and organized to own, maintain, operate and conduct facilities for the long-term and congregate care, and assisted and independent living to the elderly in a single campus community, as well as to…
We are a catholic, faith-based organization entrusted with advancing the life-enhancing senior care ministry of the benedictine sisters of duluth, minnesota. we witness to god's love by creating inclusive communities, supporting those we…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Essentia Health and the most unlike its peers is 23RD Veteran. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ESSENTIA HEALTH ↗
- Who funds LAKE SUPERIOR COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF ST SCHOLASTICA INC ↗
- Who funds ESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH ↗
- Who funds THE LAKES COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PROGRAM FOR AID TO VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT ↗
- Who funds LIFE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds COURAGE KENNY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST ANN'S HOME ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA MASONIC CHILDREN'S CLINIC FOR COMMUNICATION DISORDERS ↗
- Who funds The George Washington University ↗
- Who funds DULUTH AREA FAMILY YMCA ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE CENTER FOR VITAL LIVING ↗
- Who funds DAMIANO OF DULUTH INC ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRUS IRON RIVER HOSPITAL & CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds RURAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Well Being Development ↗
- Who funds INNOVATIVE SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Trans Northland ↗
- Who funds FIRST COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATON ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY HOUSING ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-SUPERIOR ALUMNI AND FRIENDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds 23RD VETERAN ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BENEDICTINE HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds SMDC MEDICAL CENTER ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Duluth-Superior Area Community Foundation · Ordean Foundation · Lloyd K Johnson Foundation · Northland Foundation · Smdc Medical Center · Head of the Lakes United Way · Minnesota Power Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Pachel Foundation · Second Harvest Northland · Lahti Family Foundation · St Mary's Medical Center
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Miller-Dwan Foundation and Subsidiaries funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.