Skip to content
Milford Hospital Association at a glance

· Private foundation

Milford Hospital Association

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Human Services$295kHealth$96kCrime & Legal$65kFood & Nutrition$49kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$15kCommunity Improvement$3k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHARE OUTREACH INC$24,000
MEALS ON WHEELS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY$18,000
BRIDGES DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT$18,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY$5,000
PASS ALONG PROJECT$3,000
END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER$2,500
MARGUERITES PLACE INC$2,500
MILFORD SCHOOL DENTAL PROGRAM$2,000
COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $2k → 5%PASS ALONG PROJECT: $4k → 9%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $1k → 5%PASS ALONG PROJECT: $3k → 9%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $1k → 5%PASS ALONG PROJECT: $3k → 9%PASS ALONG PROJECT: $3k → 9%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $5k → 7%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $4k → 7%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $3k → 7%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $3k → 7%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $3k → 7%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$534k · 14 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$534k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-4%

Still filing today

64%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SHARE OUTREACH INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $161k · revenue +80%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $108k · revenue +50%
  • BD
    BRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $69k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • NW
    NH WELLPOINT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • MT
    Milford Thrives
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -31%
  • MA
    Milford Area Seniors
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
3
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
4
Merrimack Valley Day Care Service

Daycare services

—
5
Southern New Hampshire Rescue Mission

We exist to share the hope of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as well as provide shelter, food, and clothing to the poor and needy in obedience to Him.

Religion
6
Addiction Recovery Coalition of New Hampshire

ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS

Health
7
Gather

Gather offers innovative programs that build food security in welcoming and dignified ways. These include our pantry market, mobile markets, Meals 4 Kids, Cooking 4 Community, gleaning, and our Gather Cafe at Great Bay Community College.

Human Services
8
The Center for Safer Communities

The mission of CSC is to enhance the safety and well-being of victims and survivors of domestic and sexual abuse and stalking through empowerment and advocacy to create a community responsive to all victims and survivors through education,…

Human Services
9
Greater Derry Community Health Services Inc

Facilitate services for individuals and families in need, inclduing information, education and guidance to coordinate service access and deliver in health care, behavorial health and other human services in partnership with the local…

—
10
Groundworks Collaborative Inc

Groundworks collaborative, inc. provides emergency shelter, housing assistance & a food shelf for homeless persons.

—
11
CityHope of New Hampshire

CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…

Human Services
12
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share Outreach Inc; the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Souhegan Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: $107,500 · OtherST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF …BRIDGES INC: $65,250 · OtherBRIDGES INCMEALS ON WHEELS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: $33,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTYBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY INC: $15,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY INCMILFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT SAU #40: $11,500 · Other+4 more: $18,500 · Other+4 moreSHARE OUTREACH INC: $161,000 · Food & NutritionSHARE OUTREACH INCEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER: $16,000 · Food & NutritionEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGERBRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES: $68,500 · HealthBRIDGES DOMESTIC…GREATER NASHUA DENTAL CONNECTION INC: $8,000 · HealthGREATER NASHUA D…+1 more: $250 · HealthMARGUERITE'S PLACE INC: $19,500 · Human ServicesTHE PASS ALONG PROJECT: $11,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $4,000 · Human ServicesMilford Area Seniors: $2,500 · Education
Other$250,750Food & Nutrition$177,000Health$76,750Human Services$35,000Education$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHARE OUTREACH INC: $161,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY: $107,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES: $68,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMARGUERITE'S PLACE INC: $19,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER: $16,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PASS ALONG PROJECT: $11,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER NASHUA DENTAL CONNECTION INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $4,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMilford Thrives: $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHome Health and Hospice Care: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…United Way of Greater…Cogswell Benevolent T…Agnes M Lindsay TrustEastern Bank Foundati…The Barker Foundation…Ann de Nicola TuwMadelaine G Vonweber …Eversource Energy Fou…Frank E Kaley Tuw-Kal…M L Billings Tr FBO N…Peoples United Commun…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Nashua Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Barker Foundation Inc · Ann de Nicola Tuw · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Frank E Kaley Tuw-Kaley Fnd · M L Billings Tr FBO Nh Charities · Peoples United Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Milford Hospital Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Milford Hospital Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Milford Hospital Association?

    Find your warmest path to Milford Hospital Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Milford Hospital Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home