Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Milford Hospital Association

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$76k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$24k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Human Services$295kHealth$96kCrime & Legal$65kFood & Nutrition$49kHousing & Shelter$20kYouth Development$15kCommunity Improvement$3k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
$3,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHARE OUTREACH INC$24,000
BRIDGES DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT$18,000
MEALS ON WHEELS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY$18,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY$5,000
PASS ALONG PROJECT$3,000
MARGUERITES PLACE INC$2,500
END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER$2,500
MILFORD SCHOOL DENTAL PROGRAM$2,000
COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $2k → 5%PASS ALONG PROJECT: $4k → 9%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $1k → 5%PASS ALONG PROJECT: $3k → 9%COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY: $1k → 5%PASS ALONG PROJECT: $3k → 9%PASS ALONG PROJECT: $3k → 9%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $5k → 7%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $4k → 7%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $3k → 7%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $3k → 7%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $3k → 7%MARGUERITES PLACE INC: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$534k · 14 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$534k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
-4%

Still filing today

64%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SHARE OUTREACH INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $161k · revenue +80%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY
    5× · 2019–2023 · $108k · revenue +50%
  • BD
    BRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES
    4× · 2022–2025 · $69k · revenue +137%

Funded once

  • NW
    NH WELLPOINT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • MT
    Milford Thrives
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -31%
  • MA
    Milford Area Seniors
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
3
Health Strategies of New Hampshire Inc
Health
4
Merrimack Valley Day Care Service

Daycare services

5
Southern New Hampshire Rescue Mission

We exist to share the hope of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as well as provide shelter, food, and clothing to the poor and needy in obedience to Him.

Religion
6
Addiction Recovery Coalition of New Hampshire

ARCNH community recovery center is a Peer-to-Peer recovery coaching program that is designed to provide those on the path to recovery with individualized care and support from those with personal experiences with SUDS

Health
7
Gather

Gather offers innovative programs that build food security in welcoming and dignified ways. These include our pantry market, mobile markets, Meals 4 Kids, Cooking 4 Community, gleaning, and our Gather Cafe at Great Bay Community College.

Human Services
8
The Center for Safer Communities

The mission of CSC is to enhance the safety and well-being of victims and survivors of domestic and sexual abuse and stalking through empowerment and advocacy to create a community responsive to all victims and survivors through education,…

Human Services
9
Greater Derry Community Health Services Inc

Facilitate services for individuals and families in need, inclduing information, education and guidance to coordinate service access and deliver in health care, behavorial health and other human services in partnership with the local…

10
Groundworks Collaborative Inc

Groundworks collaborative, inc. provides emergency shelter, housing assistance & a food shelf for homeless persons.

11
CityHope of New Hampshire

CityHope walks with individuals and families, empowering and equipping them with the necessary resources and skills needed to thrive in their communities. By providing support services to those experiencing financial hardships and housing…

Human Services
12
Dartmouth Health Home Care Inc

We are dedicated to delivering outstanding home health and hospice services that enrich the lives of the people we serve.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share Outreach Inc and the most unlike its peers is Boys and Girls Club of Souhegan Valley Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY — $107,500 · OtherST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF …BRIDGES INC — $65,250 · OtherBRIDGES INCMEALS ON WHEELS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY — $33,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS HILLSBOROUGH COUNTYBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY INC — $15,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY INCMILFORD SCHOOL DISTRICT SAU #40 — $11,500 · Other+4 more — $18,500 · Other+4 moreSHARE OUTREACH INC — $161,000 · Food & NutritionSHARE OUTREACH INCEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER — $16,000 · Food & NutritionEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGERBRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES — $68,500 · HealthBRIDGES DOMESTIC…GREATER NASHUA DENTAL CONNECTION INC — $8,000 · HealthGREATER NASHUA D…+1 more — $250 · HealthMARGUERITE'S PLACE INC — $19,500 · Human ServicesTHE PASS ALONG PROJECT — $11,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY — $4,000 · Human ServicesMilford Area Seniors — $2,500 · Education
Other$250,750Food & Nutrition$177,000Health$76,750Human Services$35,000Education$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHARE OUTREACH INC — $161,000 over 7y, 2.4% of budgetST JOSEPH COMMUNITY SERVICES DBA MEALS ON WHEELS OF HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY — $107,500 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetBRIDGES DOMESTIC AND SEXUAL VIOLENCE SUPPORT SERVICES — $68,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMARGUERITE'S PLACE INC — $19,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetEND 68 HOURS OF HUNGER — $16,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SOUHEGAN VALLEY INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PASS ALONG PROJECT — $11,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER NASHUA DENTAL CONNECTION INC — $8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY CAREGIVERS OF GREATER DERRY — $4,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetMilford Thrives — $2,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHome Health and Hospice Care — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · United Way of Greater Nashua Inc · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Barker Foundation Inc · Ann de Nicola Tuw · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Eversource Energy Foundation Inc · Frank E Kaley Tuw-Kaley Fnd · M L Billings Tr FBO Nh Charities · Peoples United Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Milford Hospital Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Milford Hospital Association?

    Find your warmest path to Milford Hospital Association through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph