Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mike's Kids

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$117k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$221kEducation$198kRecreation & Sports$167kHuman Services$115kHousing & Shelter$48kYouth Development$17kCivil Rights$14kMembership Benefit$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $90k
$10,100
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HATTIE LARLHAM CENTER$15,800
OUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE$15,000
UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY$12,500
YOUTH CHALLENGE$12,500
LAWRENCE SCHOOL$12,500
RISING START ACADEMY$12,000
ELYRIA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$10,100
MURRAY RIDGE CENTER$9,500
CAMP SUNSHINE OF AURORA$3,800
Individual grant recipient$3,800
SAVE OUR CHILDREN$3,800
ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN$3,300
Individual grant recipient$2,635
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HELP FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%HELP FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%EMPOWER SPORTS: $5k → 17%BLESSING HOUSE: $5k → 13%MATTHEW'S LENDING LIBRARY: $8k → 17%MATTHEW'S LENDING LIBRARY: $7k → 17%MATTHEW'S LENDING LIBRARY: $5k → 17%MATTHEW'S LENDING LIBRARY: $5k → 17%NEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $2k → 17%NEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE: $875 → 17%MATTHEW'S LENDING LIBRARY: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
OH
CT
CA
KY
VA
AZ
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$686k · 17 repeat orgs$112k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
35

Total granted

$686k
$109k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+42%

Still filing today

35%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OL
    OUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +46%
  • LS
    LAWRENCE SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $79k · revenue +10%
  • YC
    YOUTH CHALLENGE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $78k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • PP
    PARK PLAY SOLUTIONS LLC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Achievement Center Inc

The achievement center (center) is a non-profit organization that provides child centered and family focused therapeutic services in the areas of early childhood, physical rehabilitation, mental/behavioral health, autism spectrum disorder,…

Health
2
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
3
Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative, inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment
4
United Cerebral Palsy Association of Greater Cleveland Inc

The mission of united cerebral palsy is to empower children and adults with disabilities to advance their independence, productivity and inclusion in the community.

Health
5
The Golden Key Center for Exceptional Children Inc

The primary mission of the golden key center for exceptional children is to provide quality education and intervention services to students with developmental disabilities.

Human Services
6
The Ability Center of Greater Toledo

To assist people with disabilities to live, work and socialize within a fully accessible community.

Human Services
7
Marrakech Inc

Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…

Employment
8
Abilitypath Housing

Abilitypath housing advances affordable, accessible housing projects that promote independence and inclusive communities for adults with developmental disabilities. through partnerships and innovative program designs, abilitypath housing…

Human Services
9
Abilities First Foundation Inc

Abilities First is committed to providing comprehensive services and quality care to each child and adult with special needs to put their abilities first.

Human Services
10
Ohio Coalition for the Education of Children With Disabilities

The ohio coalition for the education of children with disabilities is a collaboration of parents, professionals, and partners advocating for children with disabilities to receive the educational services, experiences, and supports they…

11
Abilities Oc

To help people with developmental disabilities reach their highest potential and guide them through their special needs journey.

Human Services
12
Abilities Inc

Abilites Inc is a non-profit agency dedicated to facilitating integrated employment and full participation of persons with disabilities in their work and living communities. Employment is accomplished through direct service to youth and…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Help Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Painesville Credit Union. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HATTIE LARLHAM CENTER — $94,900 · OtherHATTIE LARLHAM CENTEROUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC — $88,300 · OtherOUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INCLAWRENCE SCHOOL — $79,100 · OtherLAWRENCE SCHOOLYOUTH CHALLENGE — $77,600 · OtherYOUTH CHALLENGEUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY — $71,100 · OtherUNITED CEREBRAL PALSYELYRIA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL — $58,200 · OtherELYRIA CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOLMURRAY RIDGE CENTER — $49,100 · OtherMURRAY RIDGE CENTERRISING STAR ACADEMY — $44,700 · OtherRISING STAR ACADEMY+38 more — $183,114 · Other+38 moreMATTHEW'S LENDING LIBRARY — $29,200 · Human ServicesEMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION — $5,000 · Human ServicesHELP FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesBLESSING HOUSE — $5,000 · Human ServicesNEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE INC — $2,775 · Human ServicesTHE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT — $2,585 · Arts & CultureFOOTPRINTS CENTER FOR AUTISM — $2,000 · Health
Other$746,114Human Services$46,975Arts & Culture$2,585Health$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC — $88,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE SCHOOL — $79,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH CHALLENGE — $77,600 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetMATTHEW'S LENDING LIBRARY — $29,200 over 5y, 35% of budgetACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN — $14,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHELP FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAINESVILLE CREDIT UNION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLESSING HOUSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE INC — $2,775 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT — $2,585 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOTPRINTS CENTER FOR AUTISM — $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OUR LADY OF THE WAYSIDE INC
  • Who funds LAWRENCE SCHOOL
  • Who funds YOUTH CHALLENGE
  • Who funds MATTHEW'S LENDING LIBRARY
  • Who funds ACHIEVEMENT CENTERS FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds EMPOWER SPORTS CORPORATION
  • Who funds HELP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PAINESVILLE CREDIT UNION
  • Who funds BLESSING HOUSE
  • Who funds NEW AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE INC
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH21.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · The Sk Wellman Foundation · Community Fund Management Foundation Inc · Community West Foundation · The Louise H & David S Ingalls Fdn · Giant Eagle Foundation · Community Foundation of Lorain County · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mike's Kids funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph