Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mike & Patti Hennessy Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$3.2MReligion$420kEducation$327kPhilanthropy$25kRecreation & Sports$3kHuman Services$1kYouth Development$1k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $133k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.5M
$12,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Hackensack meridian health foundation inc$1,500,000
Diocese of trenton$70,000
University of pennsylvania$62,500
The Ovarian Cancer Research Fund Inc$20,000
Zeta Tau Alpha Foundation$17,000
The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country$15,000
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine$12,500
University of South Florida$7,500
LEP FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH EDUCATION$5,000
Rutgers University$5,000
St joseph catholic church$2,500
Second Life Bikes$1,000
Make-A-Wish Foundation of New Jersey$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 20% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Make-A-Wish America: $1k → 11%University of pennsylvania: $63k → 22%The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country: $15k → 13%50CAN Inc: $30k → 14%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF COLLIER COUNTY: $10k → 10%FORCE - Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered: $20k → 13%Cancer Horizons: $1k → 8%Zeta Tau Alpha Foundation: $17k → 5%GREATER MERCER AREA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 6%Hackensack meridian health foundation inc: $1.5M → 7%Saint Joseph High School Metuchen: $10k → 8%Diocese of trenton: $275k → 11%St joseph catholic church: $3k → 12%University of pennsylvania: $63k → 22%Zeta Tau Alpha Foundation: $16k → 5%Greater Mercer Area Healthcare Foundation: $2k → 6%Hackensack meridian health foundation inc: $955k → 7%Make-A-Wish Foundation of New Jersey: $1k → 8%Diocese of trenton: $70k → 11%St joseph catholic church: $3k → 12%University of pennsylvania: $63k → 22%Second Life Bikes: $1k → 6%Hackensack meridian health foundation inc: $545k → 7%Diocese of trenton: $70k → 11%St joseph catholic church: $3k → 12%Basser Center for BRCA at the University of Penn: $60k → 22%LEP FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH EDUCATION: $5k → 6%Rider University: $15k → 11%LEP FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH EDUCATION: $5k → 6%LEP FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH EDUCATION: $5k → 6%LEP FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH EDUCATION: $5k → 6%LEP FOUNDATION FOR YOUTH EDUCATION: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
IN
PA
NJ
UT
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Mike & Patti Hennessy Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mike & Patti Hennessy Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.6M · 7 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$3.6M
$137k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+20%

Still filing today

57%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ZT
    ZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $33k · revenue +6%
  • LF
    LEP Foundation for Youth Education
    5× · 2021–2025 · $25k · revenue +77%
  • GM
    GREATER MERCER AREA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue +156%

Funded once

  • BC
    Basser Center for BRCA at the University of Penn
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
  • 5I
    50CAN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +162%
  • FO
    FORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Georgian Court University

Georgian court university (gcu), provides a comprehensive liberal arts education and is open to students of all faiths, delivers a curriculum that promotes scholarship, service, and personal development.

Education
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
6
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
9
St Catherine University

We educate women to lead and influence. we educate at all degree levels through valuing and integrating the liberal arts and professional education within the catholic intellectual tradition, see schedule oemphasizing scholarly inquiry and…

Education
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
11
National Science and Technology Medals Foundation Inc

The nstmf's mission is to build inclusive stem communities across the united states. fundamental to these communities are the significant, inspirational connections we foster between the individuals who have received national recognition…

—
12
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Collier Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greater Mercer Area Healthcare Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Hackensack meridian health foundation inc: $3,000,000 · OtherHackensack meridian health foundation incDIOCESE OF TRENTON: $415,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF TRENTON+10 more: $117,500 · OtherTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $187,500 · EducationZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION: $33,000 · Education50CAN INC: $30,000 · EducationLEP Foundation for Youth Education: $25,000 · EducationRIDER UNIVERSITY: $15,000 · EducationTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $15,000 · PhilanthropyFORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC: $20,000 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY INC: $1,000 · HealthSECOND LIFE BIKES INC: $1,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,532,500Education$290,500Philanthropy$95,000Health$21,000Youth Development$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $187,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OVARIAN CANCER RESEARCH FUND INC: $80,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION: $33,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budget50CAN INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEP Foundation for Youth Education: $25,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetFORCE-FACING OUR RISK OF CANCER EMPOWERED INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRIDER UNIVERSITY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MERCER AREA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mike & Patti Hennessy Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mike & Patti Hennessy Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Force-Facing Our Risk of Cancer Empowered Inc: 15% of income from government
  • Rider University: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mike & Patti Hennessy’s filings →

More from the funding graph