· Public charity
Midland Area Agency on Aging
To ensure coordinated, accessible services for older persons and persons with disabilities to live independent, meaningful, and dignified lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $8k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $49k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $241k
- $250k+6 grants · $3.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP | $917,249 |
| BCMW COMMUNITY SERVICES | $619,294 |
| COMPREHENSIVE CONNECTIONS | $598,924 |
| HEARTLAND HUMAN SERVICES | $515,971 |
| MIDLAND AAA | $313,572 |
| EFFINGHAM COUNTY COMMUNITY ON AGING | $285,149 |
| STOP WOMAN ABUSE NOW SWAN | $165,696 |
| LAND OF LINCOLN ASSISTANCE | $75,030 |
| ADDUS HEALTHCARE | $36,473 |
| OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACCESS | $12,546 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $7.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $6.0M · revenue +34%
- BCBCMW COMMUNITY SERVICES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $4.0M · revenue +3%
- JCJEFFERSON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $3.6M · revenue +116%
Funded once
- AWASI Worksone grant, 2017 · $45k
- CRCOVID RELIEF FROM AGE OPTIONSone grant, 2020 · $26k
- AIAGEOPTIONS INC (FKA SUBURBAN AREA AGENCY ON AGING)graduatedone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support and serve seniors with non-medical services and to promote independent living and enrich quality of life.
To plan and coordinate systems of services which help older americans, those with disabilities regardless of age and caregivers, maintain their independence through a variety of programs. these programs include, but are not limited to,…
Our mission is to lead and advocate for inclusive resources and services that empower the optimal aging of east central illinois' diverse older adults, individuals with disabilities, and their care partners.
The agency's mission is to advocate and provide services to enhance the quality of life for older adults.
We team with Community partners to provide human services with dignity and respect, empowering people in Southern Kentucky to achieve stability and economic security.
A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.
Illinois valley economic development corporation is organized as a charitable and educational organization that exists to serve the community, through programs to assist low-income, disabled, elderly, and individuals and families in need.…
To serve and enhance the lives of older people and their families in Southwest Kansas.
Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes
The older American act intends that the area agency on aging shall be the leader relative to all aging issuers on behalf of all older persons in the planning and service area. This means that the area agency shall proactively carry out,…
Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.
Senior citizen programs through the area agency on aging which provides a center, services, congregate meals and home delivery meals.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ageoptions Inc (Fka Suburban Area Agency On Aging) and the most unlike its peers is Stopping Woman Abuse Now (Swan). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BCMW COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND HUMAN SERVICES ↗
- Who funds EFFINGHAM CITY COUNTY COMMITTEE ON AGING ↗
- Who funds Stopping Woman Abuse Now (SWAN) ↗
- Who funds LAND OF LINCOLN LEGAL AID INC ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds AGEOPTIONS INC (FKA SUBURBAN AREA AGENCY ON AGING) ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACCESS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Effingham Cnty Inc · Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Midland Area Agency on Aging funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.