Loading…
· Public charity
MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING
To ensure coordinated, accessible services for older persons and persons with disabilities.
$2.5M
Granted FY2024
10
Grants
1
Communities
$810k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Human Services$5.4MCommunity Improvement$3.1MHealth$1.3MCrime & Legal$488kCivil Rights$6kOther$4.9M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
access
2020
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
2025
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $37k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $344k
- $250k+4 grants · $2.1M
$97,235
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
- CEFS ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CORP$809,508
- BCMW COMMUNITY SERVICES$562,275
- COMPREHENSIVE CONNECTIONS$498,961
- HEARTLAND HUMAN SERVICES$264,544
- MIDLAND AAA$97,235
- STOP WOMAN ABUSE NOW SWAN$89,506
- EFFINGHAM COUNTY COMMUNITY ON AGING$85,710
- LAND OF LINCOLN ASSISTANCE$71,135
- ADDUS HEALTHCARE$36,930
- OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACCESS$5,046
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $5.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 12%. 14% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$15M · 10 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else
10 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
10
6
Total granted
$15M
$52k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+37%
+81%
Still filing today
70%
33%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CECEFS Economic Opportunity Corp7× · 2018–2024 · $4.6M · revenue +31%
- BCBCMW Community Services7× · 2018–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +37%
- CCComprehensive Connections7× · 2018–2024 · $2.7M · revenue +81%
Funded once
- CRCOVID RELIEF FROM AGE OPTIONSone grant, 2020 · $26k
- AOAGE OPTIONSgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +81%
- OFOPPORTUNITIES FOR ACCESSgraduated2× · 2019–2020 · $6k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Council on Aging Services for Seniors
The Council on Aging provides essential services to our senior community through an integrated network of programs working together to fulfill our clients' needs. We currently have 12 programs including: Meals on Wheels, Senior Dining…
—
2
Seniorage Area Agency On Aging
A federally designated Area Agency on Aging whose mission is to bring independence enhancing supportive services to the 60+ population and their caregivers in our 17 county-wide service area.
Human Services
3
East Central Il Area Agency
Lead and advocate for inclusive resources and services that empower older adults.
—
4
Community Options
Adult handicapped assistance
Human Services
5
Mid-Illinois Senior Services Inc
To provide a variety of services for senior citizens
Human Services
6
Clearfield County Area Agency On Aging Inc
Program Services to Aging Population in Clearfield County
Human Services
7
Boone County Senior Citizens Services Corporation
The promotion of health care to the citizens of boone county, missouri and surrounding areas.
Human Services
8
Perry County Services Inc
Provide support services to developmentally disabled individuals of perry county,missouri through areas of community employment, job preparation, day programs, transportation and personal assistance.
Human Services
9
Central Illinois Agency On Aging Inc
Central illinois agency on aging believes in the independence and dignity of older persons, and that each older person should be empowered to exert control over their own life & have access to needed services. we do planning, program…
—
10
Central Missouri Area Agency On Aging
Aging Best's mission is to help people be as independent as possible as they navigate through life by delivering the best support, services, and programs.
Human Services
11
Achieving Independence and Mobility Cil
Independent living services for persons with disabilities.
Human Services
12
Ashland County Council On Aging
Provide services under title iii of the older american citizens act of 1965. the ashland county council on aging, inc. (the agency) is a private, nonprofit organization established to aid persons 60 years of age and older in their efforts…
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Midland Area Agency On Aging and the most unlike its peers is Bcmw Community Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
10 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
10/10
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$5,360,847Other$4,876,060Community Improvement$3,136,970Health$1,265,585Crime & Legal$488,071Civil Rights$6,036
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CEFS Economic Opportunity Corp ↗
- Who funds BCMW Community Services ↗
- Who funds Comprehensive Connections ↗
- Who funds Heartland Human Services ↗
- Who funds Effingham County Community on Aging ↗
- Who funds Stop Woman Abuse Now ↗
- Who funds Land of Lincoln Legal Assistance ↗
- Who funds MIDLAND AAA ↗
- Who funds AGE OPTIONS ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITIES FOR ACCESS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
United Way of Effingham Cnty IncIL16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: United Way of Effingham Cnty Inc · Southeastern Illinois Community · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MIDLAND AREA AGENCY ON AGING funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Comprehensive Connections.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~8 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +81% since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 237254917 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Comprehensive Connections, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Midland Area Agency on Aging?
Find your warmest path to Midland Area Agency on Aging through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines