Skip to content
Mid-Valley Healthcare Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Mid-Valley Healthcare Inc

Mid-valley healthcare, inc.

$81k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$85kHealth$36kHousing & Shelter$28kHuman Services$28kYouth Development$23kCrime & Legal$13k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $37,173, the rows itemized in this filing. The $81,079 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $43,906 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$9,450
Median grant
1
States reached
$187M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON CASCADES WEST SENIOR SERVICES FOUNDATION$13,200
CASA LATINOS UNIDOS BENTON COUNTY$9,450
JACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER$7,500
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ALBANY$7,023
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OREGON CASCADES WEST SENIOR SERVICES FOUNDATION: $13k → 13%ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $7k → 14%CASA LATINOS UNIDOS BENTON COUNTY: $9k → 18%OREGON CASCADES WEST SENIOR SERVICES FOUNDATION: $12k → 13%CASA LATINOS UNIDOS BENTON COUNTY: $6k → 18%OREGON CASCADES WEST SENIOR SERVICES FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%OREGON CASCADES WEST SENIOR SERVICES FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%OREGON CASCADES WEST SENIOR SERVICES FOUNDATION: $6k → 13%HAND IN HAND FARM INC: $6k → 13%ABC HOUSE INC: $10k → 13%ABC HOUSE INC: $8k → 13%ABC HOUSE INC: $7k → 13%ABC HOUSE INC: $7k → 13%SWEET HOME EMERGENCY MINISTRIES: $9k → 13%SWEET HOME EMERGENCY MINISTRIES: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$181k · 8 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
4

Total granted

$181k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
0%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ABC HOUSE INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $31k · revenue +13%
  • JS
    JACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $28k · revenue +185%
  • CL
    CASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $16k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • LB
    LEBANON BASIC SERVICES CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • SV
    ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue -55%
  • HI
    HAND IN HAND FARM
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Ninos Cuentan Inc

Support Service for Claskamas County

—
2
Community Sharing Program

Provide South Lane County community members with basic needs resources, life skills, and resources toward self-sufficiency.

Human Services
3
Youth Empowerment Shelter

To provide youth in crisis a place of physical and emotional safety while assisting them to build positive relationships and develop their individual potentials.

Youth Development
4
Youth and Family Crossroads

Transitional and Outreach services to homeless, care for families in crisis

Religion
5
Logan County Homeless Shelter

Shelter

Housing & Shelter
6
Bridge of Hope Ministries Inc

Provide safe & loving home for children

Human Services
7
Lodi Family Center

Family support

Human Services
8
The Lighthouse - a Place of Refuge

To provide foster youth and foster families with homeless outreach services advocacy and emergency placement through different forms of outreach that support foster youth in transition and crisis.

Human Services
9
A Small Hand -Piatt County Cares

To provide food, diapers, hygiene products, clothes, blankets, shoes, and nursing supplies to low-income households in Piatt County who have infants and toddlers. To provide emergency care and referrals to other services in Piatt County.

Human Services
10
Family Life Center Inc

Provide social services including meals, clothing, household goods, temporary housing, referral services and facilitation for grants as designated payor for various clients.

—
11
Community Outreach Inc

Our mission is helping people help themselves to lead healthy and productive lives. communiyt outreach, inc.ofeers the most comphrehensiveset of intergrated social services in the mid-williamette valley. we serve an at-risk population of…

Human Services
12
Child Welfare Society of Flint
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Linn County Inc; the most unlike its peers is Oregon Cascades West Senior Services Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OREGON CASCADES WEST SENIOR SERVICES FOUNDATION: $48,775 · Human ServicesOREGON CASCADES WEST SENIOR SERVICES FOUNDATIONABC HOUSE INC: $30,668 · Human ServicesABC HOUSE INCCASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY: $15,525 · Human ServicesCASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTYSWEET HOME EMERGENCY MINISTRIES: $15,168 · Human ServicesSWEET HOME EMERGENCY MINISTRIESST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $6,668 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETYHAND IN HAND FARM: $5,500 · Human ServicesJACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC: $28,250 · Housing & ShelterJACKSON STREET …FISH OF LEBANON: $14,168 · OtherFISH OF LEBAN…LEBANON BASIC SERVICES CENTER: $6,668 · OtherLEBANON BASIC…WILLAMETTE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER Sweet Home Pregnancy Care Center: $5,250 · OtherWILLAMETTE CR…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER SANTIAM: $15,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALBANY: $7,023 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS…CASA OF LINN COUNTY INC: $13,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$122,304Housing & Shelter$28,250Other$26,086Youth Development$22,523Civil Rights$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOREGON CASCADES WEST SENIOR SERVICES FOUNDATION: $48,775 over 5y, 22% of budgetABC HOUSE INC: $30,668 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetJACKSON STREET YOUTH SHELTER INC: $28,250 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCASA LATINOS UNIDOS DE BENTON COUNTY: $15,525 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREATER SANTIAM: $15,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSWEET HOME EMERGENCY MINISTRIES: $15,168 over 2y, 14% of budgetCASA OF LINN COUNTY INC: $13,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ALBANY: $7,023 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY: $6,668 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …United Way of Linn Be…Albany General Hospit…Good Samaritan Hospit…Benton Community Foun…Morse Family Foundati…Linn Benton Food ShareBraemar Charitable Tr…The Ford Family Found…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Oregon Community FoundationOR23.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · United Way of Linn Benton and Lincoln Counties · Albany General Hospital · Good Samaritan Hospital Corvallis · Benton Community Foundation · Morse Family Foundation · Linn Benton Food Share · Braemar Charitable Trust · The Ford Family Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mid-Valley Healthcare Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mid-Valley Healthcare Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 25%
  • Jackson Street Youth Shelter Inc: 59% of income from government
  • Casa Latinos Unidos De Benton County: 36% of income from government
  • Abc House Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of the Greater Santiam: 14% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Albany: 7% of income from government
  • Casa of Linn County Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mid-Valley Healthcare’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home