Skip to content
Mid Ohio Select Soccer League at a glance

· Public charity

Mid Ohio Select Soccer League

Provides traveling - select soccer leagues & tournaments for approximately 500 teams & 6000 children in the central ohio area.

$462k
Granted FY2023
19
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2023 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 19 grants below total $449,499, the rows itemized in this filing. The $461,556 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,057 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $325k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $111k
$21,428
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUBLIN SOCCER LEAGUE$55,987
WESTERVILLE AMATEUR SOCCER ASSOC$55,326
GAHANNA SOCCER ASSOCIATION$33,800
UNION COUNTY ELITE FC INC$32,262
KIDS INNERCITY DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER$31,937
PICKERINGTON AREA SOCCER ASSOC$26,753
TRI-VILLAGE SOCCE ASSOC$26,663
NEW ALBANY YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE$24,899
DELAWARE YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC$22,079
CHILLICOTHE YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE$21,428
NEWARK AREA SOCCER ASSOC$20,161
PRIDE SOCCER CLUB$18,841
ZANESVILLE SOCCER & RIVERSIDE PARK$16,834
PFC EXTREME$14,319
LANCASTER SELECT SOCCER ASSOC$14,180
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DELAWARE YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC: $22k → 5%UNION COUNTY ELITE FC INC: $32k → 5%LANCASTER SELECT SOCCER ASSOC: $14k → 9%BIG WALNUT SOCCER ASSOC: $7k → 10%NEWARK AREA SOCCER ASSOC: $20k → 10%MT VERNON SOCCER ASSOC: $11k → 12%CHILLICOTHE YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE: $21k → 14%NEW ALBANY YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE: $25k → 15%PRIDE SOCCER CLUB: $19k → 9%PFC EXTREME: $14k → 10%TRI-VILLAGE SOCCE ASSOC: $27k → 15%PICKERINGTON AREA SOCCER ASSOC: $27k → 9%NORTHWEST FC INC: $6k → 15%BARCELONA UNITED: $10k → 9%DUBLIN SOCCER LEAGUE: $56k → 15%KIDS INNERCITY DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER: $32k → 15%GAHANNA SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $34k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Cleveland Co Soccer Assoc
Recreation & Sports
2
West Central Soccer Association

Childrens Recreational Sports Association

Recreation & Sports
3
Lawrenceburg Greendale Soccer Club

Soccer programming for youth in the cities of Lawrenceburg, IN and Greendale IN.

Recreation & Sports
4
Sugar City Soccer League
Recreation & Sports
5
Cold Spring Area Soccer Club
—
6
Sporting Wichita Inc

The mission of Sporting Wichita is to provide a positive safe and professional environment which encourages early development and fosters a lifelong interest in soccer We seek to provide consistent quality programming structure education…

Recreation & Sports
7
Wauconda Area Youth Soccer Club

Provide recreational soccer for children 3-14

Recreation & Sports
8
Avonworth Soccer Association

Providing youth soccer programs to youth ages 4 through 17, offering programs throughout the entire year. Spring and Fall seasons have an estimated 200-400 youth players.

Recreation & Sports
9
Washington Soccer Club

Washington Soccer, Inc. PO Box 1124 Washington, Pennsylvania 15301

Recreation & Sports
10
North Shore United Soccer Club Inc

Recreation Youth Soccer

Recreation & Sports
11
Riverside Area Youth Soccer League

To provide soccer training and activities to local youth in the area

Recreation & Sports
12
Wright County Soccer

The wright county soccer mission is to allow children to play soccer through summer and fall leagues while teaching them the skills needed for them to be competitive.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Fc Inc; the most unlike its peers is Zanesville Soccer and Riverside Park Improvement Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Dublin Soccer League Inc: $55,987 · Recreation & SportsDublin Soccer League IncWESTERVILLE AMATEUR SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC: $55,326 · Recreation & SportsWESTERVILLE AMATEUR SOCCER ASSOCIATION INCGAHANNA SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $33,800 · Recreation & SportsGAHANNA SOCCER ASSOCIATIONUNION COUNTY ELITE FC INC: $32,262 · Recreation & SportsUNION COUNTY ELITE FC INCKIDS INNERCITY DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER LEAGUE INC: $31,937 · Recreation & SportsKIDS INNERCITY DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER LEAGUE INCPICKERINGTON AREA SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $26,753 · Recreation & SportsPICKERINGTON AREA SOCCER ASSOCIATIONTRI-VILLAGE SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $26,663 · Recreation & SportsTRI-VILLAGE SOCCER ASSOCIATIONDELAWARE SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $22,079 · Recreation & SportsDELAWARE SOCCER ASSOCIATIONPride Soccer Club: $18,841 · Recreation & SportsZANESVILLE SOCCER AND RIVERSIDE PARK IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION: $16,834 · Recreation & SportsPFC EXTREME % LEO HALEY: $14,319 · Recreation & SportsLANCASTER SELECT SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $14,180 · Recreation & Sports+2 more: $13,055 · Recreation & SportsNEW ALBANY YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE: $24,899 · OtherNEW ALBANY YOUTH SOCCE…CHILLICOTHE YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE: $21,428 · OtherCHILLICOTHE YOUTH SOCC…NEWARK AREA SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC: $20,161 · OtherNEWARK AREA SOCCER ASS…MOUNT VERNON SOCCER ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED: $10,608 · OtherMOUNT VERNON SOCCER AS…BARCELONA UNITED FOUNDATION INC: $10,367 · OtherBARCELONA UNITED FOUND…
Recreation & Sports$362,036Other$87,463

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDublin Soccer League Inc: $55,987 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetWESTERVILLE AMATEUR SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC: $55,326 over 1y, 21% of budgetGAHANNA SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $33,800 over 1y, 24% of budgetUNION COUNTY ELITE FC INC: $32,262 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetKIDS INNERCITY DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER LEAGUE INC: $31,937 over 1y, 20% of budgetPICKERINGTON AREA SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $26,753 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetDELAWARE SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $22,079 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetPride Soccer Club: $18,841 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetZANESVILLE SOCCER AND RIVERSIDE PARK IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION: $16,834 over 1y, 10% of budgetPFC EXTREME % LEO HALEY: $14,319 over 1y, 13% of budgetLANCASTER SELECT SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $14,180 over 1y, 11% of budgetBIG WALNUT SOCCER INC: $7,172 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetNORTHWEST FC INC: $5,883 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mid Ohio Select Soccer League funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mid Ohio Select Soccer League. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mid Ohio Select Soccer League’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home