Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Mid Ohio Select Soccer League

Provides traveling - select soccer leagues & tournaments for approximately 500 teams & 6000 children in the central ohio area.

$462k
Granted FY2023
19
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 19 grants below total $449,499 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $461,556 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,057 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $325k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $111k
$21,428
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DUBLIN SOCCER LEAGUE$55,987
WESTERVILLE AMATEUR SOCCER ASSOC$55,326
GAHANNA SOCCER ASSOCIATION$33,800
UNION COUNTY ELITE FC INC$32,262
KIDS INNERCITY DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER$31,937
PICKERINGTON AREA SOCCER ASSOC$26,753
TRI-VILLAGE SOCCE ASSOC$26,663
NEW ALBANY YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE$24,899
DELAWARE YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC$22,079
CHILLICOTHE YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE$21,428
NEWARK AREA SOCCER ASSOC$20,161
PRIDE SOCCER CLUB$18,841
ZANESVILLE SOCCER & RIVERSIDE PARK$16,834
PFC EXTREME$14,319
LANCASTER SELECT SOCCER ASSOC$14,180
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DELAWARE YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOC: $22k → 5%UNION COUNTY ELITE FC INC: $32k → 5%LANCASTER SELECT SOCCER ASSOC: $14k → 9%BIG WALNUT SOCCER ASSOC: $7k → 10%NEWARK AREA SOCCER ASSOC: $20k → 10%MT VERNON SOCCER ASSOC: $11k → 12%CHILLICOTHE YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE: $21k → 14%NEW ALBANY YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE: $25k → 15%PRIDE SOCCER CLUB: $19k → 9%PFC EXTREME: $14k → 10%TRI-VILLAGE SOCCE ASSOC: $27k → 15%PICKERINGTON AREA SOCCER ASSOC: $27k → 9%NORTHWEST FC INC: $6k → 15%BARCELONA UNITED: $10k → 9%DUBLIN SOCCER LEAGUE: $56k → 15%KIDS INNERCITY DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER: $32k → 15%GAHANNA SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $34k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Cleveland Co Soccer Assoc
Recreation & Sports
2
West Central Soccer Association

Childrens Recreational Sports Association

Recreation & Sports
3
Lawrenceburg Greendale Soccer Club

Soccer programming for youth in the cities of Lawrenceburg, IN and Greendale IN.

Recreation & Sports
4
Sugar City Soccer League
Recreation & Sports
5
Cold Spring Area Soccer Club
—
6
Sporting Wichita Inc

The mission of Sporting Wichita is to provide a positive safe and professional environment which encourages early development and fosters a lifelong interest in soccer We seek to provide consistent quality programming structure education…

Recreation & Sports
7
Wauconda Area Youth Soccer Club

Provide recreational soccer for children 3-14

Recreation & Sports
8
Avonworth Soccer Association

Providing youth soccer programs to youth ages 4 through 17, offering programs throughout the entire year. Spring and Fall seasons have an estimated 200-400 youth players.

Recreation & Sports
9
Washington Soccer Club

Washington Soccer, Inc. PO Box 1124 Washington, Pennsylvania 15301

Recreation & Sports
10
North Shore United Soccer Club Inc

Recreation Youth Soccer

Recreation & Sports
11
Riverside Area Youth Soccer League

To provide soccer training and activities to local youth in the area

Recreation & Sports
12
Wright County Soccer

The wright county soccer mission is to allow children to play soccer through summer and fall leagues while teaching them the skills needed for them to be competitive.

Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Fc Inc and the most unlike its peers is Zanesville Soccer and Riverside Park Improvement Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Dublin Soccer League Inc — $55,987 · Recreation & SportsDublin Soccer League IncWESTERVILLE AMATEUR SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC — $55,326 · Recreation & SportsWESTERVILLE AMATEUR SOCCER ASSOCIATION INCGAHANNA SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $33,800 · Recreation & SportsGAHANNA SOCCER ASSOCIATIONUNION COUNTY ELITE FC INC — $32,262 · Recreation & SportsUNION COUNTY ELITE FC INCKIDS INNERCITY DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER LEAGUE INC — $31,937 · Recreation & SportsKIDS INNERCITY DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER LEAGUE INCPICKERINGTON AREA SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $26,753 · Recreation & SportsPICKERINGTON AREA SOCCER ASSOCIATIONTRI-VILLAGE SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $26,663 · Recreation & SportsTRI-VILLAGE SOCCER ASSOCIATIONDELAWARE SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $22,079 · Recreation & SportsDELAWARE SOCCER ASSOCIATIONPride Soccer Club — $18,841 · Recreation & SportsZANESVILLE SOCCER AND RIVERSIDE PARK IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION — $16,834 · Recreation & SportsPFC EXTREME % LEO HALEY — $14,319 · Recreation & SportsLANCASTER SELECT SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $14,180 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $13,055 · Recreation & SportsNEW ALBANY YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE — $24,899 · OtherNEW ALBANY YOUTH SOCCE…CHILLICOTHE YOUTH SOCCER LEAGUE — $21,428 · OtherCHILLICOTHE YOUTH SOCC…NEWARK AREA SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC — $20,161 · OtherNEWARK AREA SOCCER ASS…MOUNT VERNON SOCCER ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED — $10,608 · OtherMOUNT VERNON SOCCER AS…BARCELONA UNITED FOUNDATION INC — $10,367 · OtherBARCELONA UNITED FOUND…
Recreation & Sports$362,036Other$87,463

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDublin Soccer League Inc — $55,987 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetWESTERVILLE AMATEUR SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC — $55,326 over 1y, 21% of budgetGAHANNA SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $33,800 over 1y, 24% of budgetUNION COUNTY ELITE FC INC — $32,262 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetKIDS INNERCITY DEVELOPMENTAL SOCCER LEAGUE INC — $31,937 over 1y, 20% of budgetPICKERINGTON AREA SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $26,753 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetDELAWARE SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $22,079 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetPride Soccer Club — $18,841 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetZANESVILLE SOCCER AND RIVERSIDE PARK IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION — $16,834 over 1y, 10% of budgetPFC EXTREME % LEO HALEY — $14,319 over 1y, 13% of budgetLANCASTER SELECT SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $14,180 over 1y, 11% of budgetBIG WALNUT SOCCER INC — $7,172 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetNORTHWEST FC INC — $5,883 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mid Ohio Select Soccer League funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines