Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mico Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$13kArts & Culture$12kAnimals$10kFood & Nutrition$8kHuman Services$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kEducation$2kEnvironment$1k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$130k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDE HOSPITAL$2,500
THE SEEING EYE$2,500
ZIGGYS HAVEN BIRD SA$1,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $2k → 14%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY: $1k → 17%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY: $1k → 17%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY: $1k → 17%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY: $1k → 17%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY: $1k → 17%COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32k · 6 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +134% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
8

Total granted

$32k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+134%
+34%

Still filing today

33%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SEEING EYE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +134%
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +9%
  • ZH
    ZIGGYS HAVEN BIRD SA
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k

Funded once

  • TT
    TIVOLI THEATER
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • TT
    THE TIVOLI THEATRE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $6k · revenue -2%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tennessee Farm Bureau Federation

To develop, foster, promote and protect programs for the general welfare, including economic, social, educational and political well-being of farm people of the great state of tennessee.

—
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc

The mission of the atlanta community food bank is to engage, educate and empower our community to fight hunger. our bold goal is to see that all people in our service area have access to the nutritious meals they need when they need them.

Food & Nutrition
4
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
5
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
6
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
7
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
8
Montgomery County Food Bank Inc

The mission of montogomery county food bank is "uniting the community" to fight hunger. the food bank is a nonprofit hunger relief organization that receives nutritious food and distributes to hungry children, seniors, veterans and…

—
9
Regional East Texas Food Bank

Etfb's mission is to fight hunger and feed hope in east texas.

—
10
Central Texas Food Bank Inc

To increase food access in Central Texas by providing nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through programs, education, and innovative solutions.

Food & Nutrition
11
Food Bank of Central & Eastern Nc Inc

Nourish people. build solutions. empower communities. no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
12
Feeding South Florida Inc

Feeding south florida's mission is to end hunger in south florida by providing immediate access to nutritious food, leading hunger and poverty advocacy efforts, and transforming lives through innovative programming and education.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tennessee Wildlife Federation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TIVOLI THEATER: $6,000 · OtherTIVOLI THEATERZIGGYS HAVEN BIRD SA: $5,500 · OtherZIGGYS HAVEN BIRD SAST JUDE HOSPITAL: $5,000 · OtherST JUDE HOSPITALSALVATION ARMY: $4,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYEYE OF THE EAGLE WILDLIFE: $4,000 · OtherEYE OF THE EAGLE WILDLIFEERLANGER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,000 · OtherLITTLE MISS MAG EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $1,000 · OtherTHE SEEING EYE INC: $6,963 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INCCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COU…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,250 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its…THE TIVOLI THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureTHE TIVOLI TH…Chattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $1,500 · Food & NutritionBRIGHT SCHOOL INC: $1,000 · EducationTENNESSEE WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$27,000Human Services$15,213Arts & Culture$6,000Food & Nutrition$1,500Education$1,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $6,963 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF CITRUS COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TIVOLI THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChattanooga Area Food Bank Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT SCHOOL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTENNESSEE WILDLIFE FEDERATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE MISS MAG EARLY LEARNING CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC9.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mico Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mico Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mico Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mico Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mico’s filings →

    More from the funding graph