Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michigan Foundation for Vision Awareness

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$558kEducation$210kRecreation & Sports$27k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $251
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $124k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EYE CARE FOR DETROIT$28,291
EXALTA HEALTH$20,929
UD MERCY SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY$20,000
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
DR GARY BURNSTEIN CLINIC$15,000
MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY - SVOSH$14,330
FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY$10,715
MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY$251
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 16%GARY BURNSTEIN CLINIC: $16k → 8%EXALTA HEALTH: $41k → 11%JACKSON DISTRICT LIBRARY: $24k → 13%EVERSIGHT: $50k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN: $20k → 14%EYE CARE FOR DETROIT: $28k → 16%GREAT LAKES BAY HEALTH CENTERS: $49k → 18%MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $42k → 20%HEALTH UNIT DAVISON AVE (HUDA) CLINIC: $53k → 21%BALDWIN FAMILY HEATLH CARE: $38k → 23%SOUTHERN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $2k → 17%OHIO STATE COLLEGE OF OPTPMETRY: $2k → 15%KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $6k → 25%DR GARY BURNSTEIN CLINIC: $15k → 8%EXALTA HEALTH: $36k → 11%ST LUKE NEW LIFE CENTER FREE EYE CLINIC: $8k → 16%MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $35k → 20%MALTA DENTAL AND MEDICAL CLINIC: $16k → 21%OHIO STATE COLLEGE OF OPTPMETRY: $1k → 15%KENTUCKY COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $1k → 25%UD MERCY SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY: $32k → 8%EXALTA HEALTH: $21k → 11%MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $30k → 20%UD MERCY SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY: $20k → 8%ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $33k → 11%MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY - SVOSH: $25k → 20%ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $8k → 11%MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY - SVOSH: $25k → 20%ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND: $4k → 11%FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $20k → 20%MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY - SVOSH: $17k → 20%FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 20%MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY - SVOSH: $14k → 20%MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $11k → 20%FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $11k → 20%FERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 20%MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $4k → 20%MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $251 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Michigan Foundation for Vision Awareness’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 98% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 90%.

Michigan Foundation for Vision Awarenesslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.0% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$440k · 8 repeat orgs$355k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$440k
$286k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+20%

Still filing today

25%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $123k
  • HI
    HEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES
    3× · 2022–2025 · $98k · revenue +4%
  • MC
    MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY - SVOSH
    4× · 2022–2025 · $82k

Funded once

  • HU
    HEALTH UNIT DAVISON AVE (HUDA) CLINIC
    one grant, 2022 · $53k
  • E
    Eversight
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +11%
  • GL
    Great Lakes Bay Health Centers
    one grant, 2024 · $49k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Board of Ophthalmology

None

—
2
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
3
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
4
Open Cities Health Center Inc

Open Cities Health Center is a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) whose mission is to provide culturally competent primary and preventive healthcare services to a largely underserved population in the Twin Cities metropolitan area.

Health
5
Cherry Street Services Inc

Cherry Street Health Services improves the health and wellness of individuals by providing comprehensive primary and behavioral health care while encouraging access by those who are underserved.

Health
6
Hope Medical Clinic Inc

Hope is a not-for-profit interdenominational christian medical, dental, and social service organization. hope's goal is to provide compassionate and practical help, ministering to the whole person with dignity and respect. this includes…

—
7
Sawtooth Mountain Clinic Inc

To provide access to high quality, comprehensive, primary healthcare in cook county to all users, regardless of financial ability to pay for service.

Health
8
Vision for the Poor

To eliminate treatable blindness through the training of eye care professionals and development of eye care infrastructure.

International
9
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
10
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
11
Belmont Professional Associates Inc

To improve the communitys health through the efficient provision, coordination, and integration of quality health services, health education, and research. To provide compassionate, quality health services according to the spiritual,…

—
12
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Intervention Services; the most unlike its peers is Dames and Knights of the Order of Malta Medical and Dental Clinic of. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY: $123,124 · OtherMICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRYMICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY - SVOSH: $81,710 · OtherMICHIGAN COLLEGE OF OPTOMETRY - SVOSHHEALTH UNIT DAVISON AVE (HUDA) CLINIC: $52,648 · OtherHEALTH UNIT DAVISON AVE (HUDA) CLINICUD MERCY SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY: $52,125 · OtherUD MERCY SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRYEversight: $50,000 · OtherEversightBALDWIN FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC: $37,695 · OtherBALDWIN FAMILY HEALTH CARE INCFERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherFERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONFERRIS STATE UNIVERSITY: $25,715 · OtherJACKSON DISTRICT LIBRARY: $24,200 · Other+7 more: $59,315 · Other+7 moreHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES: $97,847 · HealthHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICESGreat Lakes Bay Health Centers: $49,231 · HealthGreat Lakes Bay Health CentersASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $45,127 · HealthASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND VIS…EYE CARE FOR DETROIT: $28,291 · HealthEYE CARE FOR DETROITDAMES AND KNIGHTS OF THE ORDER OF MALTA MEDICAL AND DENTAL CLINIC OF: $16,310 · HealthDAMES AND KNIGHTS OF THE ORDER OF…SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsSouthern College of Optometry: $2,000 · Education
Other$536,532Health$236,806Recreation & Sports$20,000Education$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES: $97,847 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetEversight: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGreat Lakes Bay Health Centers: $49,231 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $45,127 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetBALDWIN FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC: $37,695 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEYE CARE FOR DETROIT: $28,291 over 1y, 10% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDAMES AND KNIGHTS OF THE ORDER OF MALTA MEDICAL AND DENTAL CLINIC OF: $16,310 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetSouthern College of Optometry: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HEALTH INTERVENTION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Eversight ↗
  • Who funds Great Lakes Bay Health Centers ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds BALDWIN FAMILY HEALTH CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds EYE CARE FOR DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds DAMES AND KNIGHTS OF THE ORDER OF MALTA MEDICAL AND DENTAL CLINIC OF ↗
  • Who funds Southern College of Optometry ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michigan Foundation for Vision Awareness funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michigan Foundation for Vision Awareness. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Michigan Foundation for Vision Awareness?

    Find your warmest path to Michigan Foundation for Vision Awareness through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michigan Foundation for Vision Awareness’ filings →

    More from the funding graph