Skip to content
Michigan Elementary and Middle School Principals Association Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Michigan Elementary and Middle School Principals Association Inc

To serve and support elementary and middle level principals in their delivery of quality educational experiences to the students of the state of michigan by providing leadership, legislative advocacy, professional development, and guidance.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$671kHealth$63k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $9,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $91,025 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $81,775 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$9,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT$9,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 54% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%LIVINGSTON REGIONAL EDUCATION SERVICE AGENCY: $11k → 5%THORNAPPE KELLOGG SCHOOLS: $28k → 9%BEAVER ISLAND COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $97k → 9%EATON REGIONAL EDUCATION SERVICE AGENCY: $16k → 9%TRAVERSE CITY AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $12k → 10%MONROE COUNTY INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $11k → 10%MACOMB INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $11k → 10%ONSTED COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $10k → 12%COMSTOCK PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $8k → 12%TUSCOLA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $12k → 12%ALCONA SCHOOLS: $6k → 13%LAKE CITY AREA SCHOOLS: $7k → 13%EASTERN UP INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $16k → 13%ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $8k → 14%AU GRES SIMS SCHOOLS: $8k → 14%LAKEVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 14%CROSSWELL-LEXINGTON SCHOOLS: $8k → 14%LAKE LINDEN - HUBBELL PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $8k → 14%MUSKEGON AREA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $11k → 15%WILLOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $8k → 16%HOUGHTON LAKE COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $8k → 16%GENESEE INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $16k → 16%SAGINAW INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $16k → 18%MINDFUL PRACTICES: $14k → 14%PINCKNEY SCHOOLS: $17k → 5%THORNAPPE KELLOGG SCHOOLS: $10k → 9%BEAVER ISLAND COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $63k → 9%TRAVERSE CITY AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10k → 10%CENTER LINE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $8k → 10%MADISON SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8k → 12%TUSCOLA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $12k → 12%SAULT AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $8k → 13%CALHOUN INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $11k → 14%COPPER CO MENTAL HEALTH: $11k → 14%WHITEHALL DISTRICT SCHOOLS: $8k → 15%HOLT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $9k → 16%GENESEE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $8k → 16%CHEASANING UNION SCHOOLS: $8k → 18%DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT: $49k → 21%PINCKNEY SCHOOLS: $14k → 5%TRAVERSE CITY AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10k → 10%TUSCOLA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT: $11k → 12%HOLT PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $8k → 16%DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT: $11k → 21%DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT: $11k → 21%DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT: $9k → 21%CLIPPERT MULTI-CULTURAL ACADEMY: $8k → 21%DEARBORN HEIGHTS DISTRICT #7: $6k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$393k · 7 repeat orgs$341k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
39

Total granted

$393k
$341k

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BEAVER ISLAND COMMUNITY SCHOOLS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $160k
  • DP
    DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT
    4× · 2019–2025 · $87k
  • TK
    THORNAPPLE KELLOGG SCHOOLS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $38k

Funded once

  • LS
    LAKEVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • EU
    EASTERN UP INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
  • SI
    Saginaw Intermediate School District
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

0 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2018–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2018 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 0 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BEAVER ISLAND COMMUNITY SCHOOLS: $160,391 · OtherBEAVER ISLAND COMMUNITY SCHOOLSDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICT: $86,900 · OtherDETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS COMMUNITY DISTRICTTHORNAPPLE KELLOGG SCHOOLS: $38,000 · OtherTuscola Intermediate School District: $34,500 · OtherTRAVERSE CITY AREA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $31,500 · OtherPINCKNEY SCHOOLS: $30,831 · Other+40 more: $351,540 · Other+40 more
Other$733,662

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michigan College Acce…Michigan Physical Fit…Sme Education Foundat…I Car Education Found…For Inspiration and R…Michigan Health Endow…State Alliance of Mic…Project Lead the Way …Share Our StrengthKinexus Youth Solutio…Fidelity Investments …
Michigan College Access NetworkMI39.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michigan College Access Network · Michigan Physical Fitness Health and Sports Foundation · Sme Education Foundation · I Car Education Foundation · For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · State Alliance of Michigan YMCAs (0050) · Project Lead the Way Inc · Share Our Strength · Kinexus Youth Solutions · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michigan Elementary and Middle School Principals Association’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home