Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$749k
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$772kHousing & Shelter$735kHealth$594kAnimals$540kYouth Development$522kCrime & Legal$196kFood & Nutrition$152kRecreation & Sports$56kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $73k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $577k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$13,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$195k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY$100,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$30,000
STEPPING STONE SHELTER$30,000
REINS OF LIFE$30,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$30,000
NEST COMMUNITY SHELTER$30,000
PALADIN$30,000
STEPPING STONE SHELTER$30,000
OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$30,000
ANTHONY ADAMS HOUSE$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF LAPORTE COUNTY INC$27,500
FAMILY ADVOCATES INC$25,000
SOUL STEPPERS DRILL TEAM INC$25,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF LA PORTE COUNTY$25,000
NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $934k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GARY: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GARY: $10k → 15%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER: $15k → 15%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER: $8k → 15%STEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN: $70k → 15%STEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN INC: $65k → 15%PALADIN INC: $50k → 15%PALADIN INC: $50k → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $40k → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $40k → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADSINC: $40k → 15%PALADIN: $30k → 15%PALADIN: $30k → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $30k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $25k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $25k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES INC: $25k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES INC: $20k → 15%PALADIN: $20k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $15k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $15k → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $15k → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $15k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $13k → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $12k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $11k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $11k → 15%PALADIN INC: $10k → 15%PALADIN INC: $10k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $9k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $8k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $8k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $8k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES: $8k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES INC: $8k → 15%NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCYS INC: $8k → 15%SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER: $3k → 15%FAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $36k → 15%FAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $35k → 15%FAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $25k → 15%INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $3k → 15%FAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $25k → 15%INDIANA GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES INC: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in IN; by stated purpose, 87%.

Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 44 repeat orgs$220k to everyone else

44 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
21

Total granted

$4.2M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+55%

Still filing today

52%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHousing & ShelterHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OD
    OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $275k · revenue +95% · 32% of their budget
  • CC
    CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $242k · revenue +79%
  • RO
    REINS OF LIFE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $231k · revenue +210%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SALAVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • IG
    INDIANA GUARDENSHIP SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • IG
    INDIANA GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana County Community Action Program

Provide resources for low income clients.

Human Services
2
Greater Laporte Chamber of Commerce Inc

Chamber of commerce for laporte, indiana

—
3
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
4
Greater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc

To provide temporary housing and other support services to homeless families in the greater Lafayette area of Tippecanoe County, Indiana

Food & Nutrition
5
Bridges Community Services Inc

To develop, coordinate, and proivde housing, social services, and educational programs for low income and moderate income residents of muncie, indiana.

—
6
Laporte County Leadership Inc

Leadership training

—
7
Laporte County Habitat for Humanity

The purpose of the organization is to build houses for families who are financially distressed. this is a local affiliate of habitat for humanity international.

—
8
Meals on Wheels of Evansville Inc
Food & Nutrition
9
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
10
Family Service Inc

To provide family and individual counseling

—
11
The Arc of Northwest Indiana Inc

Mission is to provide necessary resources to persons with disabilities in order to assist them in enhancing their daily lives. we provide pre-vocational training, habilitation services, individual support, and employment services based on…

Human Services
12
Community Action of East Central Indiana

To provide education and assistance to low income, disadvantaged individuals and children.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Central Community Action Agencies Inc; the most unlike its peers is Youth Service Bureau of La Porte County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF MICHIGAN CITY: $600,000 · OtherCITY OF MICHIGAN CITYSALVATION ARMY: $482,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYREINS OF LIFE INC: $231,000 · OtherREINS OF LIFE INCSTEPPING STONE SHELTER: $220,000 · OtherSTEPPING STONE SHELTERLAPORTE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $126,850 · OtherDUNEBROOK INC: $121,000 · Other+44 more: $742,325 · Other+44 moreNORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES INC: $217,000 · Human ServicesNORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY…PALADIN INC: $200,000 · Human ServicesPALADIN INCINTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $195,000 · Human ServicesINTERFAITH COMMUNITY PA…STEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN INC: $135,000 · Human ServicesSTEPPING STONE SHELTER …FAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $121,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY ADVOCATES INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF GARY: $35,000 · Human Services+2 more: $40,500 · Human ServicesCITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $242,476 · Housing & ShelterCITIZENS …ANTHONY ADAMS HOUSE: $98,000 · Housing & ShelterANTHONY A…HOMEWARD BOUND INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHOMEWARD …BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC: $197,500 · Youth DevelopmentFLY HIGH YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED: $107,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $12,500 · Youth DevelopmentOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $275,000 · HealthTHE JACK AND SHIRLEY LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $19,500 · Arts & CultureLAPORTE COUNTY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $7,216 · Arts & CultureFootlight Players Inc: $4,000 · Arts & CultureYOUNG AUDIENCES OF INDIANA INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureMichigan City Chamber Music Festival Inc: $6,000 · EducationOPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES INC: $3,000 · Employment
Other$2,523,675Human Services$943,500Housing & Shelter$360,476Youth Development$317,000Health$275,000Arts & Culture$33,716Education$6,000Employment$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN DOOR COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC: $275,000 over 6y, 32% of budgetCITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $242,476 over 6y, 10% of budgetREINS OF LIFE INC: $231,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES INC: $217,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPALADIN INC: $200,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC: $197,500 over 6y, 7.1% of budgetINTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC: $195,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetSTEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN INC: $135,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetLAPORTE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $126,850 over 5y, 4.4% of budgetFAMILY ADVOCATES INC: $121,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetDUNEBROOK INC: $121,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetFLY HIGH YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED: $107,000 over 5y, 52% of budgetANTHONY ADAMS HOUSE: $98,000 over 5y, 34% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF GARY: $35,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER ON THE RIDGE INC: $25,500 over 3y, 12% of budgetHOMEWARD BOUND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetTHE JACK AND SHIRLEY LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $19,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetService League of Michigan City IN Inc: $18,100 over 2y, 27% of budgetINDIANA GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES: $15,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetSOUTH SHORE NAUTICAL EDUCATION: $9,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetLAPORTE COUNTY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $7,216 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN INDIANA MICHIANA INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPPORTUNITY ENTERPRISES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG AUDIENCES OF INDIANA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPEN DOOR COMMUNITY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CITIZENS CONCERNED FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds REINS OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CENTRAL COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PALADIN INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY PADS INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONE SHELTER FOR WOMEN INC ↗
  • Who funds LAPORTE COUNTY MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ADVOCATES INC ↗
  • Who funds DUNEBROOK INC ↗
  • Who funds FLY HIGH YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ANTHONY ADAMS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF GARY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN COUNSELING CENTER ON THE RIDGE INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEWARD BOUND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JACK AND SHIRLEY LUBEZNIK CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Service League of Michigan City IN Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU OF LA PORTE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA GUARDIANSHIP SERVICES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Healthcare Foundation of la Porte IncIN41.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Healthcare Foundation of la Porte Inc · Unity Foundation of la Porte County · United Way of Greater Laporte County Inc · The Barker Welfare Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · John W Anderson Foundation · Duneland Health Council · 1st Source Bank Foundation Inc Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · Lilly Endowment Inc · Morgan Family Foundation Inc · Bethany Lutheran Church of Laporte Foundation Inc · Br Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Michigan City Community Enrichment Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michigan City Community Enrichment’s filings →

    More from the funding graph