Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Michigan 2-1-1 Inc

Michigan 2-1-1 connects people with information and resources to build healthy, safe communities.

$3.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$847k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Philanthropy$12MHealth$7.0MHuman Services$3.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$2.5MCommunity Improvement$1.9M
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$477,835
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gryphon Place$847,150
United Way of Southeastern Michigan$726,037
211 of Northeast Michigan$566,914
United Way of South Central Michigan$477,835
Heart of West Michigan United Way$393,147
Community Access Line of the Lakeshore 211$391,695
UPCAP Services Inc$282,476
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $5.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%UPCAP SERVICES INC: $384k → 13%COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE INC: $491k → 15%UPCAP SERVICES INC: $371k → 13%COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE INC: $463k → 15%United Way of South Central Michigan: $478k → 12%UPCAP Services Inc: $282k → 13%COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE INC: $411k → 15%UPCAP SERVICES INC: $264k → 13%Community Access Line of the Lakeshore 211: $392k → 15%UPCAP SERVICES INC: $242k → 13%COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE INC: $297k → 15%UPCAP SERVICES INC: $191k → 13%COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE INC: $289k → 15%UPCAP SERVICES INC: $164k → 13%COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE INC: $250k → 15%UPCAP SERVICES INC: $123k → 13%COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE: $204k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$26M · 8 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
0

Total granted

$26M
$0

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterHealthCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
    8× · 2018–2025 · $5.5M · revenue +54%
  • GRYPHON PLACE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3.9M · revenue +249%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE 211
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +43% · 82% of their budget

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field

    The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    United Way of Greater Toledo

    United way of greater toledo unites the caring power of people to improve lives.

    Philanthropy
    2
    United Way of Greater Central Michigan

    United way provides leadership and resources to improve the quality of life in our community by generating revenue, creating awareness and engaging volunteers.

    3
    United Way of Wexford-Missaukee Counties

    To meet critical human needs that will improve the quality of life and build a better community in wexford and missaukee counties. the united way of wexford-missaukee counties works to impact three targeted areas through community…

    4
    United Way of Marquette County

    Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…

    5
    United Way of Lapeer County

    To unite the community by developing resources to meet the community needs.

    Philanthropy
    6
    Greater Ottawa County United Way

    To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of community to advance the common good. greater ottawa county united way supports, develops, and implements a range of impact solutions that improve lives and creates stronger communities.

    7
    United Way of the Midlands

    United way connects people and resources to improve the quality of life in the midlands. united way invests in a broad range of community programs that increase access to health care, improve student success, assist people in crisis to…

    Philanthropy
    8
    United Way of Greater Chattanooga

    Uniting people and resources in building a stronger, healthier community

    Philanthropy
    9
    Michigan 2-1-1 Inc

    Michigan 2-1-1 connects people with information and resources to build healthy, safe communities.

    Human Services
    10
    United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

    United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

    Philanthropy
    11
    United Way Manitowoc County Inc

    United way's mission is to improve lives.

    Philanthropy
    12
    United Way of Southwest Michigan

    United way of southwest michigan works in berrien, cass, and van buren counties to sustain a united community where everyone contributes, belongs, and thrives.

    Philanthropy

    For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Heart of West Michigan United Way and the most unlike its peers is Gryphon Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    2
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    2
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/8
    Grantees still filing
    7/8
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY — $5,565,897 · PhilanthropyHEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITE…UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN — $1,116,030 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL …UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $5,536,315 · Public Safety & DisasterUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEAS…COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE 211 — $3,273,833 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACCESS LINE …UPCAP SERVICES INC — $2,021,346 · Human ServicesUPCAP SERVICES INCGRYPHON PLACE — $3,859,711 · HealthGRYPHON PLACE211 Northeast Michigan — $2,999,528 · Community Improvement211 Northeas…UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY — $1,907,072 · Other
    Philanthropy$6,681,927Public Safety & Disaster$5,536,315Human Services$5,295,179Health$3,859,711Community Improvement$2,999,528Other$1,907,072

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY — $5,565,897 over 8y, 8.0% of budgetUNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN — $5,536,315 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetGRYPHON PLACE — $3,859,711 over 8y, 22% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE 211 — $3,273,833 over 8y, 82% of budget211 Northeast Michigan — $2,999,528 over 8y, 71% of budgetUPCAP SERVICES INC — $2,021,346 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY — $1,907,072 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN — $1,116,030 over 2y, 2.5% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds HEART OF WEST MICHIGAN UNITED WAY
    • Who funds UNITED WAY FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN
    • Who funds GRYPHON PLACE
    • Who funds COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE 211
    • Who funds 211 Northeast Michigan
    • Who funds UPCAP SERVICES INC
    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF JACKSON COUNTY
    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Michigan Association of United Ways IncMI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Michigan Association of United Ways Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Michigan 2-1-1 Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Michigan 2-1-1 Inc?

      Find your warmest path to Michigan 2-1-1 Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph