Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Michelle Odom Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$56k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0195% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Health$42kCrime & Legal$38kYouth Development$30kPhilanthropy$30kCommunity Improvement$29kScience & Tech$25kFood & Nutrition$24kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$5,148
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOWN SYNDROME NETWORK OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC$40,105
RAPE ABUSE AND INCEST NATIONAL NETWORK INC$5,148
FIVE BUCKETS FOUR SHOVELS FOUNDATION$5,148
FOOD RUNNERS$5,148
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TIBETAN NYINGMA RELIEF FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%DOWN SYNDROME NETWORK OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $40k → 15%DOWN SYNDROME NETWORK OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY INC: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$188k · 6 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$188k
$65k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    Down Syndrome Network of Montgomery County Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $42k · revenue +130%
  • Rape Abuse & Incest National Network
    3× · 2021–2023 · $38k · revenue +15%
  • TF
    THE FIVE BUCKETS FOUR SHOVELS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +142%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION - SEATTLE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $24k
  • TN
    Tibetan Nyingma Relief Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Drug Users Union Dba Health Initiatives forthe Tenderloin

San Francisco Drug Users Union advocates at the local, state, and federal level forthe protection and promotion of the health and wellness of people who use drugs.

Health
2
Bay Area Resource for Newcomers

Burma Refugee Families & Newcomers is a not-for-profit organization located in Oakland, California, that provides support and empowers refugees of all ethnic groups from Burma and other countries resettling in the San Francisco Bay area.

Human Services
3
Law Foundation of Silicon Valley

The Law Foundation uses the law as a tool for change. The Law Foundation addresses problems linked to social injustices like poverty, discrimination, child abuse, and neglect. Every day, our attorneys, social workers, and advocates craft…

Crime & Legal
4
San Francisco Green Film Festival

San Francisco Green Film Festival's (SFGFF) mission is to educate and connect communities through forward thinking programs of environmental films, dialogues, and action opportunities.

5
Sacramento Lgbt Community Center

The Center works to create a region where all LGBTQ+ people thrive; we support health and wellness,advocate for equity and justice, and work to uplift our diverse and culturally rich LGBTQ+ community.

6
Advance Sf

Advance SF is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco through education, advocacy, and research. The…

Human Services
7
Daily Bowl

The mission of Daily Bowl is to glean, produce and distribute food and providing jobs to the community.

Food & Nutrition
8
Sf Partnership

SF Partnership is an organization comprised of SF's leading employers dedicated to supporting an equitable, resilient, and vibrant economy shared by all people working and living in San Francisco. Through education, advocacy, and research,…

9
The Sierra Fund

The Sierra Fund (TSF) is a non-profit organization with a mission to restore ecosystem and community resiliency in the Sierra Nevada.

Environment
10
Mfdp Sf Mark Foehringer Dance Project Sf

Professional dance organization focused on creating presenting dance performances and outreach activities and admission free outdoor dance festival and workshops in San Francisco

Arts & Culture
11
The Swinerton Foundation

The swinerton foundation helps build sustainable cities and neighborhoods by partnering with community-focused non-profit organizations to support health, social services, cultural, education, and environmental programs that benefit all…

Philanthropy
12
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Community Center and the most unlike its peers is Tibetan Nyingma Relief Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION - SEATTLE — $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDAT…FOOD RUNNERS — $24,139 · OtherFOOD RUNNERSIndividual grant recipient — $23,757 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDown Syndrome Network of Montgomery County Inc — $42,105 · Human ServicesDown Syndrome Network o…Tibetan Nyingma Relief Foundation — $10,000 · Human ServicesTibetan Nyingma Relief …Rape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) — $38,192 · HealthRape Abuse & Ince…THE FIVE BUCKETS FOUR SHOVELS FOUNDATION — $30,148 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FIVE BUCK…THE SD MAYER FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Public BenefitTHE SD MAYER …SAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $23,000 · Community ImprovementSAN FRANCISCO…Bolinas Community Inc — $6,000 · Community ImprovementBolinas Commu…
Other$72,896Human Services$52,105Health$38,192Youth Development$30,148Public Benefit$30,000Community Improvement$29,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDown Syndrome Network of Montgomery County Inc — $42,105 over 2y, 24% of budgetRape Abuse & Incest National Network (RAINN) — $38,192 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FIVE BUCKETS FOUR SHOVELS FOUNDATION — $30,148 over 4y, 12% of budgetTHE SD MAYER FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetFOOD RUNNERS — $24,139 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO LESBIAN GAY BISEXUAL TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY CENTER — $23,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTibetan Nyingma Relief Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetBolinas Community Inc — $6,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Michelle Odom Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph