Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michele E Dufault Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$160kYouth Development$110kScience & Tech$98kArts & Culture$70kHealth$60kEnvironment$48kAnimals$40kHuman Services$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $69k
$6,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LABORATORY SAFETY INSTITUTE$25,000
WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION$13,500
NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL$10,000
NORTH AND SOUTH RIVERS WATERSHED ASSOCIATION$10,000
SUMMER STARS CAMP FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC$10,000
BRIGHAM & WOMEN'S HOSPITAL$7,500
ATLANTIC WHITE SHARK CONSERVANCY$6,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS$6,000
GIRLS INC OF GREATER LOWELL$5,000
SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS$5,000
BACK ON MY FEET BOSTON$5,000
SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS$5,000
PENIKESE ISLAND SCHOOL$5,000
SCITUATE PUBLIC SCHOOLS$1,000
FRIENDS OF HOLLY HILL FARM INC$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FRIENDS OF HOLLY HILL FARM INC: $1k → 7%FRIENDS OF HOLLY HILL FARM INC: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$614k · 17 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$614k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+108%

Still filing today

76%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentScience & TechHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $95k · revenue +32%
  • TL
    THE LABORATORY SAFETY INSTITUTE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +4%
  • NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL
    6× · 2019–2025 · $55k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TF
    TIMBERLINE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +101%
  • Safe Passagegraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +108%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
2
The Woodward School for Girls Inc

The woodward school honors and cultivates each student's academic and personal potential to enrich the world with courage and creativity. woodward has been educating and empowering young women in grades 6-12 since 1894.

—
3
Girls Incorporated of Greater Santa Barbara

The organizations mission is to inspire all girls to be strong,smart, and bold, through research-based, innovative, and educational programs and activities.

—
4
Stoneleigh-Burnham School

Stoneleigh-burnham school is an academic community that fosters an international perspective. we inspire girls to pursue meaningful lives based on honor, respect, and intellectual curiosity. each student is challenged to discover her best…

Education
5
Girls Global Academy Public Charter School

Girls global academy public charter school (gga) was incorporated in the district of columbia in june 2019 and opened its doors in august 2020 fostering pathways to lead and learn. as an all-girls public charter high school, gga ignites…

—
6
Emma Willard School

Emma willard school is a privately operated school for girls in grades 9 through 12 for boarding and day students.

Education
7
The Hewitt School

To inspire girls and young women to become game changers and ethical leaders who forge an equitable, sustainable and joyous future.

—
8
Marine Science Institute

The institutes mission is to cultivate a responsibility for the natural environment and our human communities through interdisciplinary science education.

—
9
Washington School for Girls

Washington school for girls ignites the joyful pursuit of learning and inspires lives of faith-filled purpose, leadership, and service by educating girls in underserved areas through an academically challenging education. an extended day…

Education
10
Our Sisters School

Educateandinspireeconomicallydisadvantagedgirlsfromthenewbedford, massachusetts area.empower girls with valuable life skills and a mindset of achievement by providing a safe, supportive, and academically challenging environment.

Education
11
Sea Education Association Inc

Sea educates and inspires ocean scholars, stewards and leaders. sea fosters and enhances knowledge about the state of oceans and coastal communities. it also helps shape public dialogue and policy through long-term environmental reseach,…

—
12
The Waldorf School Inc

The waldorf school of lexington nurtures each child's curiosity, ingenuity, and love of learning so that they can meet the future with wonder, confidence, and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Science Club for Girls Inc; the most unlike its peers is Timberline Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE LABORATORY SAFETY INSTITUTE INC: $79,500 · EducationTHE LABORATORY SAFETY INS…NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $55,000 · EducationNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOO…TIMBERLINE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $94,500 · Science & TechWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC…ATLANTIC WHITE SHARK CONSERVANCY INC: $40,000 · Science & TechATLANTIC WHITE SHARK CON…GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTE…SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentSCIENCE CLUB FOR GIR…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOWELL: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED O…Summer Stars Foundation Inc: $70,000 · Arts & CultureSummer Stars…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED: $45,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGH…BACK ON MY FEET BOSTON: $15,000 · OtherBACK ON MY FEET BO…BACK ON MY FEET: $16,000 · OtherBACK ON MY FEETSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $12,500 · OtherSOCIETY OF WOMEN E…+4 more: $10,558 · Other+4 moreNORTH & SOUTH RIVERS WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC: $48,000 · EnvironmentPENIKESE ISLAND SCHOOL INC: $20,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$139,500Science & Tech$134,500Youth Development$110,000Arts & Culture$70,000Other$99,058Environment$48,000Crime & Legal$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION: $94,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LABORATORY SAFETY INSTITUTE INC: $79,500 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetSummer Stars Foundation Inc: $70,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL: $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH & SOUTH RIVERS WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC: $48,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetATLANTIC WHITE SHARK CONSERVANCY INC: $40,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC: $35,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOWELL: $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetPENIKESE ISLAND SCHOOL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetBACK ON MY FEET: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTIMBERLINE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetSafe Passage: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF HOLLY HILL FARM INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds THE LABORATORY SAFETY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds Summer Stars Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds NORTH & SOUTH RIVERS WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC WHITE SHARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOWELL ↗
  • Who funds PENIKESE ISLAND SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BACK ON MY FEET ↗
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF WOMEN ENGINEERS ↗
  • Who funds TIMBERLINE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Safe Passage ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HOLLY HILL FARM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation IncMA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michele E Dufault Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michele E Dufault Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution: 63% of income from government
  • Atlantic White Shark Conservancy Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Girls Incorporated of Greater Lowell: 3% of income from government
  • Friends of Holly Hill Farm Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Michele E Dufault Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Michele E Dufault Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Michele E Dufault’s filings →

More from the funding graph