Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael Sweig Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$437k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$1.3MPublic Safety & Disaster$134kHuman Services$112kAnimals$100kCrime & Legal$67kCommunity Improvement$55kRecreation & Sports$35kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$300,000
UCSD CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION$50,000
ROBERT H LURIE CANCER CENTER$50,000
CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
CITY OF HOPE$10,000
DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S ADVISORY COUNCIL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LAURA'S HOUSE: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 15 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +236% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
6

Total granted

$1.7M
$139k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+236%
+13%

Still filing today

40%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureAnimalsCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $127k · revenue +47%
  • PI
    PAWS INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +259%
  • OC
    ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS ADVISORY COUNCIL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $64k · revenue +485%

Funded once

  • BC
    BLOOD CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • Northwestern Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $35k · revenue +33%
  • NP
    NATIONAL PANCREAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -49%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Injured Police Officers Fund

Provide financial assistance to families of officers injured or killed in the line of duty.

Crime & Legal
2
Los Angeles Police Memorial Foundation

The foundation provides grants to los angeles police department employees and their families who are experiencing financial difficulty due to death, injury or illness.

—
3
California Narcotic Officers Association Survivors Memorial Fund

To provide relief for the immediate economic hardship of the spouse or other close family members of any peace officer in the state of California who loses his or her life while enforcing narcotic laws.

—
4
Los Angeles Police Foundation

The mission of lapf is to create partnerships to provide resources and programs that help the police perform at their highest level and to enhance lapd-community relations.(see schedule o)

Human Services
5
Burbank Police Foundation

The mission of the burbank police foundation is to cultivate a solid partnership between the burbank police department and the residents, businesses, and institutions it serves in order to enrich the community of burbank and to enhance…

Arts & Culture
6
Virginia Beach Police Foundation Inc

None

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Chicago Police Foundation

The chicago police foundation is dedicated to helping improve public safety in the city of chicago by supporting and funding programs to supplement resources, equipment and training available to the chicago police department.

Public Benefit
8
Los Angeles County Law Enforcement Trust

Supporting families of fallen law enforcement officers

Human Services
9
Nassau County Police Department Foundation Inc

To provide financial support to the analytic, operational and outreach components of the Nassau County Police Departments mission to serve and protect the people of Nassau County and to provide safety and an improved quality of life in our…

Crime & Legal
10
Newport Beach Police Association

Assist members in maintaining vocation, assist in contract/labor negotiations, assist members in litigation against or brought by members, assist in member or member family welfare, provide charitable donations and support programs for the…

—
11
California Peace Officers Memorial Foundation Inc

To recognize and honor california's peace officers who gave their lives in the line of duty. serving the citizens of this great state, and provide support to the family members left behind.

Arts & Culture
12
National Police Canine Association Inc

Train & certify police officers in the use of K-9 dogs.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Police Memorial Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $750,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC+2 more: $26,000 · HealthUCSD CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherUCSD CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATIONCPM FOUNDATION: $109,000 · OtherCPM FOUNDATIONLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $75,000 · OtherLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATIONROBERT H LURIE CANCER CENTER: $75,000 · OtherROBERT H LURIE CANCER CENTERCITY OF HOPE: $55,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPENORTHWESTERN MEDICINE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $55,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEDICINE MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONMAYO CLINIC: $50,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICBLOOD CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherBLOOD CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherROBERT H LURIE HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER: $25,000 · Other+3 more: $9,000 · OtherCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $127,000 · Arts & CulturePAWS INC: $100,000 · AnimalsORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS ADVISORY COUNCIL: $63,888 · Crime & LegalNorthwestern University: $35,000 · Recreation & SportsNEWPORT BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Public BenefitLAURA'S HOUSE: $3,000 · Human Services
Health$776,000Other$688,000Arts & Culture$127,000Animals$100,000Crime & Legal$63,888Recreation & Sports$35,000Public Benefit$7,000Human Services$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $750,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $127,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPAWS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS ADVISORY COUNCIL: $63,888 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetNorthwestern University: $35,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PANCREAS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNEWPORT BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIN JESUS NAME MEDICAL MINISTRY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO POLICE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAWS INC ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFFS ADVISORY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PANCREAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEWPORT BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAURA'S HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Douglas County Sheriffs Advisory Council ↗
  • Who funds IN JESUS NAME MEDICAL MINISTRY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael Sweig Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael Sweig Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael Sweig’s filings →

    More from the funding graph