Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Michael Donnewald Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Education$48kHuman Services$21kCommunity Improvement$20kPhilanthropy$19kFood & Nutrition$11kHealth$11kReligion$10kHousing & Shelter$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $42k
$3,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL SAINTS ACADEMY$22,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
KENSLEY AND WILL PRANTE TRUST$10,000
TOYS FOR JOY GREENVILLE$5,000
CITY HOPE CHURCH$5,000
HOLY GARDEN OF PRAYER CHURCH$5,000
THE CARING COMMUNITY GROUP CHRISTMAS DRIVE$5,000
MATTHEW 25 ECUMENICAL FOOD PANTRY$5,000
JARED BURKE FOUNDATION$3,000
ALTON MEMORIAL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION$2,000
LEWIS & CLARK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$2,000
HIGHLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,000
NINE NETWORK OF PUBLIC MEDIA$1,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS$1,000
CLINTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LEAPS OF LOVE INC: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MA
NJ
CA
MO
AR
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 97% of Michael Donnewald Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 85% of the giving stays in IL; read by stated purpose it is 1% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Michael Donnewald Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$93k · 14 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$93k
$7k

Still filing today

43%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
AnimalsCommunity ImprovementHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AS
    ALL SAINTS ACADEMY SAINTS
    2× · 2022–2023 · $26k
  • BC
    BCMW COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue -9%
  • TF
    TOYS FOR JOY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k

Funded once

  • AI
    AVISTON IL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • ST
    STANDING TALL FOR ALI
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • OG
    OPERATION GIVING BACK MISSION BOHOL
    one grant, 2023 · $500

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Home & Aid Society of Ill

Founded in 1883, brightpoint (formerly known as children's home & aid) is a leading statewide organization supporting families so children can thrive.

Human Services
2
Blaine County Hunger Coalition Inc

The hunger coalition builds a healthy community through access to good food and addresses the root causes of food insecurity in collaboration with key partners.

Food & Nutrition
3
Holland Community Hospital

To continuously improve the health of the communities we serve in the spirit of hope, compassion, respect and dignity.

Health
4
Bloom Madison County
Food & Nutrition
5
Lawrence Humane Society

The lawrence humane society nurtures the human-animal bond by providing shelter, care and advocacy for homeless and abused animals, as well as resource for the pets and people in our community

Animals
6
St Louis Area Food Bank Inc

St. louis area foodbank is building a stronger bi-state region by nourishing people, empowering communities, and transforming systems.

7
Advocate Health and Hospitals Corp

The mission of advocate health and hospitals corporation is to servethe health needs of individuals, families and communities though awholistic philosopy rooted in our fundamental understanding of humanbeings as created in the image of god.

Health
8
Lake County Crisis Center

A safe place is the leading advocate for eliminating domestic violence & human trafficking in northern illinois.

9
Lake Humane Society

Mission: to protect animals and build connections between pets and people through advocacy and education. vision: leading and guiding a humane lake county core values: compassion for pets and people. engagement through innovative programs,…

Animals
10
East Central Illinois Community Action Agency Inc

The mission of east central illinois community action agency is to eradicate poverty; engage, empower and enrich individuals, families, and communities to become self-sufficient by providing information, training, and partnership services.

11
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
12
Community Action Organization

Community action leads the way to eliminate conditions of poverty and creates opportunities for people and communities to thrive.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bcmw Community Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Clinton County Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALL SAINTS ACADEMY SAINTS — $25,500 · OtherALL SAINTS ACADEMY SAINTSALL SAINTS ACADEMY — $22,000 · OtherALL SAINTS ACADEMYIndividual grant recipient — $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKENSLEY AND WILL PRANTE TRUST — $10,000 · OtherKENSLEY AND WILL PRANTE TRUSTTOYS FOR JOY INC — $10,000 · OtherTOYS FOR JOY INCLEWIS & CLARK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $7,000 · OtherMATTHEW ECUMENICAL FOOD PANTRY — $6,000 · OtherTOYS FOR JOY GREENVILLE — $5,000 · OtherCITY HOPE CHURCH INC — $5,000 · OtherAVISTON IL VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT — $5,000 · OtherHOLY GARDEN OF PRAYER CHURCH — $5,000 · OtherJARED BURKE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · OtherTHE CARING COMMUNITY GROUP CHRISTMAS DRIVE — $5,000 · OtherMATTHEW 25 ECUMENICAL FOOD PANTRY — $5,000 · Other+9 more — $13,500 · Other+9 moreBCMW COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementBCMW COMMUNIT…HIGHLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,000 · PhilanthropyGREEN AMERICA — $2,000 · AnimalsCLINTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,000 · AnimalsDARE AMERICA — $3,000 · HealthST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $3,000 · Arts & CultureLeaps of Love Inc — $1,000 · Human Services
Other$139,000Community Improvement$20,000Philanthropy$4,000Animals$4,000Health$3,000Arts & Culture$3,000Human Services$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBCMW COMMUNITY SERVICES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEWIS & CLARK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $7,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetHIGHLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDARE AMERICA — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN AMERICA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALTON MEMORIAL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLINTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY — $2,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLeaps of Love Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BCMW COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
  • Who funds LEWIS & CLARK HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds HIGHLAND AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DARE AMERICA
  • Who funds ST LOUIS REGIONAL PUBLIC MEDIA INC
  • Who funds GREEN AMERICA
  • Who funds ALTON MEMORIAL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CLINTON COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds Leaps of Love Inc
  • Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHWESTERN ILLINOIS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Michael Donnewald Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph