Skip to content

· Private foundation

Michael and Amber Chang Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$97kRecreation & Sports$54kHealth$43kHuman Services$31kYouth Development$20kEducation$8kArts & Culture$1kCivil Rights$1k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$45,000
YOUTH TENNIS SAN DIEGO$2,500
AMERICAN WOMEN ARTISTS$1,011
SCHOOL CONNECT WA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%ST MARYS: $39k → 10%HARPER FOR KIDS: $10k → 10%ECCTA: $1k → 11%FOUNTAIN OF LIFE: $38k → 14%HELPING HANDS: $18k → 13%SCHOOL CONNECT WA: $1k → 9%ST MARY'S: $18k → 10%HARPER FOR KIDS: $8k → 10%PENDLETON COMMUNITY SERVICE FUND: $230 → 11%FOUNTAIN OF LIFE: $5k → 14%HELPING HANDS: $13k → 13%MERCER ISLAND COVENANT CHURCH: $300 → 9%ST MARY'S: $14k → 10%HARPER FOR KIDS: $3k → 10%YOUTH TENNIS OF SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%VALUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ST MARY'S: $12k → 10%YOUTH TENNIS SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%ST MARY'S: $11k → 10%YOUTH TENNIS SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%ST MARY'S: $3k → 10%YOUNG TENNIS SAN DIEGO: $2k → 11%ORANGE HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 10%SADDLEBACK CHURCH: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$199k · 5 repeat orgs$51k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +292% since the first grant, against +121% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$199k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+292%
+121%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MARYS
    6× · 2017–2023 · $97k
  • FO
    FOUNTAIN OF LIFE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $43k
  • HH
    HELPING HANDS INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $31k

Funded once

  • VS
    VALUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +32%
  • OH
    ORANGE HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • E
    ECCTA
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Oaks School

In an atmosphere of mutual respect and responsibility, the oaks school prepares students to meet the world with the combined wisdom of an intelligent mind, a skilled hand, and a compassionate heart.

Education
2
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

—
3
Sierra Foothill Charter School

The charter school mission is to provide a rigorous, well-rounded education, with a focus on science and sustainability, that helps students acquire the academic and personal skills they need to excel in higher education, think creatively,…

Education
4
Taipei American School Foundation

Taipei american school's mission is to cultivate an enduring commitment to learning, personal well-being, and service. tas provides a broad american-based education with a global perspective that develops students of character who are…

Education
5
Seattle Christian School Association

Seattle christian schools is committed to providing a premier, christ-centered education for k-12 students. blessed with a legacy of over 70 years of god's provision and leading, students benefit from an unparalleled educational…

Education
6
The Santa Ynez Valley Family School

The family school is dedicated to providing a superior environment of child centered academic and creative programs which inspire a joy of learning and support critical thinking. we strive to prepare students to be compassionate,…

Education
7
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

—
8
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
9
Trinity Academy of Portland

The mission of trinity academy of portland is to educate middle and high school students within a joyful christian school culture marked by the discovery of truth, the practice of goodness, the creation of beauty, and the development of…

Education
10
The Winsor School

Our mission: the winsor school prepares young women to pursue their aspirations and contribute to the world.

Education
11
Georgetown Day School

Georgetown day school seeks to enroll students who have the potential to take advantage of its challenging academic program. georgetown day school does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, gender, age, sexual orientation,…

Education
12
National Collegiate Athletic Association

Provide a world-class athletics and academic experience for student-athletes that fosters lifelong well-being.

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship of Christian Athletes; the most unlike its peers is Rotary Camp Pendleton Foundation fka Pendleton Community Service Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST MARYS: $96,780 · OtherST MARYSFOUNTAIN OF LIFE: $42,500 · OtherFOUNTAIN OF LIFEHELPING HANDS INC: $30,523 · OtherHELPING HANDS INCYOUTH TENNIS SAN DIEGO: $9,180 · Other+4 more: $2,800 · OtherFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHL…Harper For Kids Inc: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentHarper For Kids IncTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationVALUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationSCHOOL CONNECT WA: $1,000 · EducationAMERICAN WOMEN ARTISTS: $1,011 · Arts & CultureRotary Camp Pendleton Foundation fka Pendleton Community Service Fund: $230 · Philanthropy
Other$181,783Youth Development$65,000Education$7,000Arts & Culture$1,011Philanthropy$230

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $45,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarper For Kids Inc: $20,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetYOUTH TENNIS SAN DIEGO: $9,180 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN WOMEN ARTISTS: $1,011 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVALUE SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL CONNECT WA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRotary Camp Pendleton Foundation fka Pendleton Community Service Fund: $230 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Michael and Amber Chang Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Michael and Amber Chang Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Michael and Amber Chang Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Michael and Amber Chang Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Michael and Amber Chang’s filings →

    More from the funding graph