Skip to content
Miami Kiwanis Youth Foundation Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Miami Kiwanis Youth Foundation Inc

Contributions to organizations that provide for health & public welfare $142,000; contributions to organizations that aid youth physically, mentally, morally and provide education $56,502; contributions to organizations that provide for the homeless, habilitation and handicapped $29,292.

$224k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$21k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $206,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $223,871 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $17,871 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $200k
$15,834
Median grant
1
States reached
$526k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIWANIS CLUB OF LITTLE HAVANA FOUNDATION$21,433
JUNIOR ORANGE BOWL COMMITTEE$20,833
RICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST$18,483
GREATER MIAMI & SOUTH FLORIDA YOUTH & COMMUNITY$17,834
CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP$16,833
OPTIMIST FOUNDATION OF GREATER GOULDS$16,833
COCONUT GROVE PREPARATORY OPTIMIST$15,834
BOYS' & GIRLS' CLUBS OF MIAMI-DADE$15,833
CUTLER RIDGE SOCCER$15,533
CITRUS FAMILY CARE NETWORK$14,834
PUMPS PEARLS & PORTFOLIOS$13,884
CHILDREN'S RESOURCE FUND$11,833
MCMILLAN MIDDLE SCHOOL$6,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $17k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miami County Young Men's Christian Association Inc

The miami county ymca is a charitable, community service organization that includes men, women, and children of all ages, abilities, incomes, races, and religions. we are dedicated to building strong kids, families and communities by…

Human Services
2
Ywca South Florida Inc

Provide services and programs for women, teens, children, and families of miami-dade county in focusing our mission of eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

Human Services
3
Coastal Kicks Soccer Inc

The primary mission to provide a professional and affordable option for the youth in all communities in north east florida, regardless of income levels, to receive top quality soccer training and development. we bring those with interest…

Recreation & Sports
4
Chiquita Jackson Enterprise Corp
Community Improvement
5
Propel Inc

Propel is a not-for-profit organization is dedicated to fostering leadership potential, academic and career success, and healthy living choices of underserved youth (ages 7-21) living in palm beach, broward, and polk counties of florida by…

Youth Development
6
Central Miami Intergroup
—
7
Achieve Miami Inc

Achieve miami, inc. is a florida 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to fostering a transformational educational ecosystem in miami. in partnership with leaders across the public and private sectors, achieve miami designs and…

Education
8
University of Miami
—
9
The Miami Girls Foundation Inc
—
10
All Florida Arts & Athletics Preparatory Academy Incorporated

provide mental health related services and activities to youth and their families. serving undeserved neighborhoods.

Human Services
11
Community Coalition Inc

Community coalition, inc. is a local non-profit 501(c)(3) agency that has been serving miami-dade county residents since 1998. our agency is committed to providing services to those who need assistance and guidance to meet their needs. we…

Employment
12
Miami Marlins Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Resource Fund Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cutler Ridge Soccer Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUNIOR ORANGE BOWL COMMITTEE INC: $20,833 · OtherJUNIOR ORANGE BOWL COMMITTEE INCCOCONUT GROVE PREPARATORY OPTIMIST: $15,834 · OtherCOCONUT GROVE PREPARATORY OPTIMISTCITRUS HEALTH NETWORK INC: $14,834 · OtherCITRUS HEALTH NETWORK INCPUMPS PEARLS AND PORTFOLIOS INC: $13,884 · OtherPUMPS PEARLS AND PORTFOLIOS INCMIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $6,000 · OtherMIAMI-DADE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLSRICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST CLUB INC OF MIAMI FL: $18,483 · Youth DevelopmentRICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST CL…GREATER MIAMI AND SOUTH FLORIDA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY INC: $17,834 · Youth DevelopmentGREATER MIAMI AND SOUTH FLOR…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MIAMI INC: $15,833 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MIAMI …KIWANIS OF LITTLE HAVANA FOUNDATION INC: $21,433 · Community ImprovementKIWANIS OF …CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $16,833 · Human ServicesCHAPMAN P…THE OPTIMIST FOUNDATION OF GREATER GOULDS FLORIDA INC: $16,833 · PhilanthropyTHE OPTIM…CUTLER RIDGE SOCCER INC: $15,533 · Recreation & SportsCHILDRENS RESOURCE FUND INC: $11,833 · Education
Other$71,385Youth Development$52,150Community Improvement$21,433Human Services$16,833Philanthropy$16,833Recreation & Sports$15,533Education$11,833

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIWANIS OF LITTLE HAVANA FOUNDATION INC: $21,433 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetJUNIOR ORANGE BOWL COMMITTEE INC: $20,833 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetRICHMOND PERRINE OPTIMIST CLUB INC OF MIAMI FL: $18,483 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetGREATER MIAMI AND SOUTH FLORIDA YOUTH AND COMMUNITY INC: $17,834 over 1y, 18% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $16,833 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OPTIMIST FOUNDATION OF GREATER GOULDS FLORIDA INC: $16,833 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF MIAMI INC: $15,833 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCUTLER RIDGE SOCCER INC: $15,533 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCITRUS HEALTH NETWORK INC: $14,834 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS RESOURCE FUND INC: $11,833 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation …Amazonsmile Foundation
The Miami Foundation IncFL16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Miami Kiwanis Youth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Miami Kiwanis Youth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Citrus Health Network Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $228k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Miami Kiwanis Youth’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home