Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Metz-Wang Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$56kHuman Services$3kHealth$3kInternational$2kFood & Nutrition$1kAnimals$1kCommunity Improvement$450Public Safety & Disaster$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$40
Median grant
14
States reached
$13k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,500
UNITED WOMEN OF EAST AFRICA$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS$150
SAMARITANS PURSE$125
ST JUDE CHILDRENS$100
TURNING POINT USA$100
MERCY SHIP$60
SPCA$50
ORANGE COUNTY RESCUE MISSION$40
ALLEY CATS ALLIES$40
PROJECT K-9 HERO$28
FEED THE CHILDREN$25
BOYS TOWN$25
FEEDING AMERICA$25
SMILE TRAIN$25
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $25 → 12%YMCA OF SAN DIEGO: $3k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $50 → 11%BOYS TOWN: $20 → 12%RED CROSS: $100 → 11%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $50 → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA: $50 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 45% of Metz-Wang Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 22% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Metz-Wang Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$46k · 29 repeat orgs$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
47

Total granted

$46k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+18%

Still filing today

59%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalHealthAnimalsEducationFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH
    7× · 2017–2024 · $27k · revenue +44%
  • OG
    OAK GROVE SCHOOL LLC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $9k · revenue +22%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $875 · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • AC
    AMERICAN CULLINARY FED RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • YO
    YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +81%
  • NS
    NATIONAL STEM CELL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $525 · revenue +154%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
2
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
3
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
6
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

7
United States Pharmacopeial Convention

Usp's mission is to improve global health through public standards and related programs that help ensure the quality, safety, and benefit of medicines and foods.

Health
8
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

9
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
10
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

11
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
12
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Keelan Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Veteran Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceAnimal Rescue and AdoptionHomeless Services & ShelterChild and Family ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Elementary Literacy TutoringChristian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support OrganizationsYmca Community CentersIndependent K-8 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%43%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%20%<5yr14%61%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%2%35–55yr16%12%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 20% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/43
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,522

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
32/41
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $27,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHOAK GROVE SCHOOL LLC — $9,100 · EducationOAK GROVE SCHOOL LLC+1 more — $550 · EducationAMERICAN CULLINARY FED RELIEF FUND — $15,000 · OtherAMERICAN CULLINARY FED RELIEF FUNDTHE CULINARY INSTITUTE — $3,000 · OtherTHE CULINARY INSTITUTEIndividual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $1,380 · OtherUNITED WOMEN OF EAST AFRICA — $1,000 · Other+52 more — $5,670 · Other+52 moreYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $2,670 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $200 · Human Services+7 more — $400 · Human ServicesST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $875 · HealthNATIONAL STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC — $525 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100 · Health+2 more — $45 · HealthCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $263 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $200 · InternationalMercy Corps — $95 · InternationalFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $75 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $73 · International+1 more — $15 · InternationalFeeding America — $635 · Food & NutritionTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $250 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc — $125 · AnimalsAlley Cat Allies Inc — $90 · AnimalsPROJECT K9 HERO — $28 · AnimalsPAWS OF HONOR INC — $25 · Animals
Education$36,650Other$28,550Human Services$3,270Health$1,545International$721Food & Nutrition$635Animals$518

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $27,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetYMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $2,670 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $875 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $635 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC — $525 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNational Restaurant Association — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $263 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Culinary Federation Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FOODSERVICE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION — $175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Keelan Family Foundation — $130 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc — $125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC — $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HAWAII INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps — $95 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc — $90 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC — $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC — $73 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC — $55 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLearning Ally Inc — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $45 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOrange County Rescue Mission Inc — $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Legion — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $15 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Metz-Wang Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Mercy Corps47% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc4% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Metz-Wang Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Metz-Wang Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph