Skip to content

· Private foundation

Messmer Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$88kHealth$46kHousing & Shelter$28kEducation$28kYouth Development$27kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$20kRecreation & Sports$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$591k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VMP FOUNDATIONS INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,500
MORNING GLORY MINISTRIES$5,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
MYSO$5,000
MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION$5,000
WOMENS CARE CENTER$5,000
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$5,000
VMP FOUNDATION INC$5,000
THE CONSERVANCY FOR HEALING HERIT$5,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH WA$5,000
HEAR WISCONSIN$3,000
ARTISTS WORKING IN EDUCATION$2,500
ANCIENT ORDER OF HIBERNIANS$2,500
BALLPARK DAY OF FAITH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC HOME: $1k → 17%HEAR WISCONSIN: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$165k · 12 repeat orgs$132k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
23

Total granted

$165k
$97k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+28%

Still filing today

42%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureReligionEducationHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALL HANDS BOATWORKS INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $22k · revenue +65%
  • PB
    Prevent Blindness Wisconsin
    2× · 2022–2023 · $15k · revenue +10%
  • CATHEDRAL CENTER INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $8k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE GESU
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • AA
    AQUINAS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SF
    SAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Milwaukee Public Theatre Inc

Making the arts accessible to all

—
2
Milwaukee Excellence Inc

The mission of the organization is to provide a high quality education for all students with choices after graduation that will provide financial stability, inspire personal freedom to builda legacy.

—
3
The Uwm Foundation Inc

The mission of the uwm foundation, inc. is to support the educational, literary, and scientific endeavors of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee by receiving, managing, and distributing gifts to benefit the university's students,…

Education
4
Wisconsin Chamber Orchestra Inc

Strengthen communities by providing high-quality and innovative artistic experiences that entertain, inspire, and unite diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
5
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
6
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
7
Artworks for Milwaukee Inc

ArtWorks mission is preparing youth for tomorrow by providing transferable career skills through arts internships today. More than 1,450 high school students have completed ArtWorks internships since our inception.

Arts & Culture
8
Central City Cyberschool of Milwaukee Inc

A charter school providing motivation to inner city children to promote a successful future

Education
9
The Uwm Real Estate Foundation Inc

To partner with the public and private sectors to develop and hold real estate for the benefit of the university of wisconsin-milwaukee. the uwm real estate foundation, inc. holdings may include any properties that advance the mission of…

Housing & Shelter
10
Mathematics Institute of Wisconsin Co Kathryn Leverenz
Education
11
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
12
Milwaukee County War Memorial Inc

The war memorial center's mission is to honor the dead and serve the living. we commemorate the courageous men and women who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of freedom while preserving and sharing the stories, experiences, and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Chamber Theatre Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Crab Lake Conservation Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSION: $20,000 · OtherMILWAUKEE RESCUE MISSIONCHURCH OF THE GESU: $20,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE GESUFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH WA: $20,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH WAWOMENS CARE CENTER: $17,500 · OtherWOMENS CARE CENTERPrevent Blindness Wisconsin: $15,000 · OtherPrevent Blindness WisconsinIndividual grant recipient: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAQUINAS ACADEMY: $10,000 · OtherSAINT FRANCIS DE SALES SEMINARY: $10,000 · OtherANCIENT ORDER OF HIBERNIANS: $10,000 · Other+18 more: $55,000 · Other+18 moreVMP FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · HealthVMP FOUNDAT…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthALL HANDS BOATWORKS INC: $22,000 · Recreation & SportsALL HANDS …CONSERVANCY FOR HEALING &: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsCONSERVANC…MILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD: $5,000 · Arts & CultureABOVE THE CLOUDS INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $3,200 · Arts & CultureFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureARTISTS WORKING IN EDUCATION INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $6,000 · EducationDR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC: $5,000 · EducationChesterton Academy of Milw Inc: $5,000 · EducationCATHEDRAL CENTER INC: $8,000 · ReligionArise Milwaukee Inc: $1,500 · ReligionWELL READ MOM INC: $500 · ReligionHEAR Wisconsin Inc: $3,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE CATHOLIC HOME INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesCRAB LAKE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$188,500Health$31,000Recreation & Sports$27,000Arts & Culture$18,700Education$16,000Religion$10,000Human Services$4,000Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVMP FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetALL HANDS BOATWORKS INC: $22,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetPrevent Blindness Wisconsin: $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCATHEDRAL CENTER INC: $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetABOVE THE CLOUDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetDR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChesterton Academy of Milw Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC: $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEAR Wisconsin Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTISTS WORKING IN EDUCATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetArise Milwaukee Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMILWAUKEE CATHOLIC HOME INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR DEAF-BLIND PERSONS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCRAB LAKE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetWELL READ MOM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VMP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS BOATWORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Prevent Blindness Wisconsin ↗
  • Who funds CATHEDRAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVANCY FOR HEALING & ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD ↗
  • Who funds ABOVE THE CLOUDS INC ↗
  • Who funds DR HOWARD FULLER COLLEGIATE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Chesterton Academy of Milw Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED PERFORMING ARTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAR Wisconsin Inc ↗
  • Who funds FLORENTINE OPERA COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS WORKING IN EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JOHN'S NORTHWESTERN ACADEMIES ↗
  • Who funds Arise Milwaukee Inc ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE CATHOLIC HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI31× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Evan & Marion Helfaer Foundation · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Olive & Eunice Toussaint Fdn Inv Agy · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Dorothy Inbusch Foundation Inc · Ralph Evinrude Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Gardner Foundation · Anon Charitable Trust · The Ros Foundation · Youth Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Messmer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Messmer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Messmer Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Messmer Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Messmer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph