Skip to content

· Public charity

Mesivta Tifereth Israel of Rizhin Jerusalem Inc

To perpetuate, promote and teach religious studies and religious activities and observances through voluntary grants to institutions here in the united states and abroad dedicated for such purposes.

$13M
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Religion$2.8MPhilanthropy$183kOther$0
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $376,397, the rows itemized in this filing. The $13,055,244 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,678,847 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k6 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $241k
$11,082
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAAMONIM$120,000
CONGREGATION ZICHRON YOSEF MORDECHA$70,000
CONG BIRKAS YITZCHAK DBONHAD$50,771
CONGREGATION ZICHRON ARYEH MORDCHE$35,640
YESHIVAS BOYAN TIFERES MORDECHAI SC$23,330
CONG BOYAN MONSEY$20,000
CONG BOYAN KLOIZ-KOLLEL$11,082
BNOS CHAYA$9,250
BAIS BROCHO DKARLIN STOLIN$8,400
BNOS ZION OF BOBOV$8,000
CONG BNEI YITZCHOK$8,000
TZEMACH TZADIK$6,144
CONG AHAVAS TZEDAKA VCHESED$5,780
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CONG BOYAN MONSEY: $52k → 14%CONGREGATION ZICHRON MAYER LEIB: $23k → 17%CONG BAIS YAAKOV NECHEMIA DSATMAR: $30k → 20%CHICAGO CTR FOR TORAH & CHESED: $14k → 14%TIKUN SHLOMO: $225k → 11%AHAVAS CHAVEIRIM: $35k → 14%GOMLEI CHESED OF BOYAN: $14k → 20%TIKUN SHLOMO: $124k → 11%CONG BOYAN MONSEY: $25k → 14%CONGREGATION ZICHRON ARYEH MORDCHE: $61k → 11%AHAVAS CHAVEIRIM: $24k → 14%CONGREGATION ZICHRON ARYEH MORDCHE: $46k → 11%CONG BOYAN MONSEY: $20k → 14%CONGREGATION ZICHRON ARYEH MORDCHE: $36k → 11%AHAVAS CHAVEIRIM: $17k → 14%CONGREGATION ADAS YEREIM: $71k → 20%CONGREGATION ADAS YEREIM: $57k → 20%CONGREGATION AHAVAS CHESED: $55k → 20%CONGREGATION AHAVAS CHESED: $40k → 20%YESHIVAS BOYAN TIFERES MORDECHAI SC: $435k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZEDAKA VCHESED: $400k → 20%CONG AHAVAS TZEDAKA VCHESED: $346k → 20%VAAD HARABUNIM: $165k → 20%FRIENDS OF BOYAN: $162k → 20%YESHIVAS BOYAN TIFERES MORDECHAI SC: $151k → 20%CONG BOYAN KLOIZ-KOLLEL: $131k → 20%NVEH SHALOM: $80k → 20%CONG CHINO V'CHISDA: $75k → 20%CONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL OF BOYAN: $64k → 20%BYD: $54k → 20%CONGREGATION BOYAN KLOIZ: $51k → 20%YESHIVAS BOYAN TIFERES MORDECHAI SC: $50k → 20%AGUDAT REFUA VCHAIM: $35k → 20%VAAD HARABUNIM: $31k → 20%YESHIVAS BOYAN TIFERES MORDECHAI SC: $23k → 20%CONG BOYAN KLOIZ-KOLLEL: $22k → 20%ZAM: $21k → 20%ZBF FOUNDATION: $20k → 20%CONG SAAD VIEZER INC: $20k → 20%CONG BOYANER KLOIZ TIFERETH MORDECH: $17k → 20%CONGREGATION EZRAS YISROEL OF BOYAN: $14k → 20%PAAMONIM: $120k → 20%CONG BIRKAS YITZCHAK DBONHAD: $51k → 20%PAAMONIM: $30k → 20%CONG BIRKAS YITZCHAK DBONHAD: $28k → 20%CONG BIRKAS YITZCHAK DBONHAD: $26k → 20%CONG BIRKAS YITZCHAK DBONHAD: $22k → 20%CHASDEI DAVID INC: $14k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $13M on the FY2022 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Region not stated$13M · 100% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: RELIGIOUS CONG/SCHOO

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.5M · 25 repeat orgs$755k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +215% since the first grant, against +116% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2022, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
20

Total granted

$3.5M
$671k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+215%
+116%

Still filing today

4%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $84k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $752k
  • YB
    YESHIVAS BOYAN TIFERES MORDECHAI SCHLOMO
    4× · 2019–2022 · $660k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2018–2019 · $349k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $162k
  • NS
    NVEH SHALOM
    one grant, 2020 · $80k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
2/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INC: $751,700 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAS TZDOKAH VCHESED INCYESHIVAS BOYAN TIFERES MORDECHAI SCHLOMO: $659,884 · OtherYESHIVAS BOYAN TIFERES MORDECHAI SCHLOMOIndividual grant recipient: $348,825 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION BOYANER KLOIZ TIFERETH MORDECHAI SHLOMO: $216,228 · OtherCONGREGATION BOYANER KLOIZ TIFERETH MORDECHAI SHLOMOIndividual grant recipient: $206,152 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $161,510 · OtherCONGREGATION ZICHRON ARYEH INC: $142,880 · OtherCONGREGATION ADAS YEREIM: $140,358 · Other+37 more: $1,406,177 · Other+37 morePaamonim: $150,000 · PhilanthropyZBF FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCHASDEI DAVID INC: $14,473 · Philanthropy
Other$4,033,714Philanthropy$184,473

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPaamonim: $150,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetCHASDEI DAVID INC: $14,473 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Paamonim ↗
  • Who funds ZBF FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI DAVID INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY29.7× affinity15 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Donors Fund Inc · S&W Foundation Inc · Vyazreim Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mesivta Tifereth Israel of Rizhin Jerusalem Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mesivta Tifereth Israel of Rizhin Jerusalem Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mesivta Tifereth Israel of Rizhin Jerusalem Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mesivta Tifereth Israel of Rizhin Jerusalem Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mesivta Tifereth Israel of Rizhin Jerusalem’s filings →

    More from the funding graph