· Public charity
Mercy Housing Southeast
The mission of MERCY HOUSING SOUTHEAST is to directly facilitate the provision of affordable housing to families, seniors, people with special needs, homeless and potentially homeless individuals who would otherwise lack the financial resources to obtain quality, safe housing.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $198,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $204,794 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,794 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $63k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $135k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST MARY'S VILLA INC | $135,000 |
| MERCY HOUSING MOUNTAIN PLAINS | $31,500 |
| MERCY HOUSING MIDWEST | $15,750 |
| MERCY HOUSING SOUTHWEST | $15,750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +120% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $198k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MHMERCY HOUSING INC4× · 2017–2020 · $489k · revenue +120%
- CCCHARLES CREST CORPORATION4× · 2017–2021 · $194k · revenue +15%
- MHMPI HIGHLAND PLACE APARTMENTS LP2× · 2021–2022 · $121k
Funded once
- CCCHARLES CREST II CORPORATIONone grant, 2018 · $39k · revenue +19%
- M1MHSE 16 SAVANNAH GARDENS 6 LPone grant, 2022 · $12k
- MHMERCY HOUSING GEORGIA X LPone grant, 2021 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mercy housing management group is to provide property management services for properties serving families, seniors, and people with special needs who lack the economic resources to access quality, safe housing opportunites.…
To own and operate a 32-unit apartment project in paducah, kentucky, providing housing for low-income persons
Own and operate a 55-unit apartment project in moscow, idaho, known as hawthorne village apartments, which provides housing to disadvantaged persons
The purpose of mercy properties i, inc is to manage or direct entities which are organized for the purpose of creating stable, vibrant and healthy communities by developing, financing and operating affordable, program-enriched housing for…
The mission of mercy housing northwest-idaho is to directly facilitate the provision of affordable housing to families, seniors, people with special needs, homeless and potentially homeless individuals who would otherwise lack the…
Indianapolis ministries 2, inc. (the "corporation") is a wholly owned subsidiary of mercy housing wheaton nfp. the corporation is a not-for-profit corporation formed on september 25, 2015, in accordance with the not-for-profit statutes of…
The mission of mercy housing northwest is to directly facilitate the provision of affordable housing to families, seniors, people with special needs, homeless and potentially homeless individuals who would otherwise lack the financial…
The corporation was formed for the purpose of operating a 383-unit community located in denver, colorado which provides housing and related services for elderly, low- and moderate-income persons.
To provide low-income persons, homeless, and potentially homeless persons or otherwise disadvantaged persons with housing facilities and educational and supportive services
Indianapolis ministries i, inc. (im1i), is a not-for-profit corporation formed on september 25, 2015, in accordance with the not-for-profit statutes of the state of indiana. the corporation was formed for the purpose of operating a 74-unit…
Marian park, inc. (the "corporation") was organized april 26, 1972, as an illinois non-stock, nonprofit organization for the purpose of constructing and operating a rental housing project under section 236 of the national housing act. such…
Alexandria ministries, inc. (the "corporation") the corporation was organized on september 25, 2015 as a not-for-profit corporation in accordance with the not-for-profit statutes of the state of indiana. the corporation was formed for the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mercy Housing Midwest and the most unlike its peers is Mercy Housing Mountain Plains. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mercy Housing Southeast funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.