Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Mercy Health Partners

We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.MERCY HEALTH PARTNERS is a member of mercy health and trinity health.

$2.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$2.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$27MPhilanthropy$178kHuman Services$95kReligion$89kCommunity Improvement$35kHousing & Shelter$21kEducation$20kFood & Nutrition$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,062,929
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSKEGON COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT$2,062,929
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WINGS OF MERCY INC: $10k → 8%HOPE PROJECT: $10k → 15%THE HOPE PROJECT: $10k → 15%PIONEER RESOURCES INC: $9k → 15%COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE: $10k → 15%CALL 211 COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE: $10k → 15%CALL 211 COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE: $10k → 15%SENIOR RESOURCES WEST MICHIGAN: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$27M · 9 repeat orgs$128k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
18

Total granted

$27M
$128k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+1%
+19%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionReligionHousing & ShelterEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MISSION FOR AREA PEOPLE
    3× · 2017–2020 · $49k · revenue +120%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE 211
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +31%
  • TH
    THE HOPE PROJECT INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $20k · revenue +167%

Funded once

  • KF
    KIDS' FOOD BASKET INC
    one grant, 2017 · $13k · revenue +16%
  • SS
    SEVEN STEPS UP
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • WD
    WHITEHALL DISTRICT SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2017 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mgh Family Health Center Muskegon Family Care

Muskegon family care is a federally qualified health center with medical and dental clinics reaching out to uninsured and underinsured patients in muskegon county.

Health
2
Muskegon County Cooperating Churches

To minister to the physical, emotional and spirtual needs of people within the muskegon area, without regard to race, creed, color or religious affiliation.

3
Michigan Christian Home

The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…

4
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
5
Mercy Health Partners

We, mercy health and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy health partners is a member of mercy health and trinity health.

6
Muskegon Lakeshore Chamber of Commerce

Member programs/services, economic development

7
Medical Care Access Coalition Inc

To promote cooperative medical services throughout marquette county and the upper peninsula of michigan that would provide a continuum of care for qualifying, uninsured, and/or under-insured persons.

8
Midland County Council On Aging

Our mission is to promote and enrich quality of life for older adults and those who care for them by collaboratively providing meaningful services and opportunities.

Human Services
9
Chippewa Health Access Coalition

The organization was formed for the purpose of providing access to quality health care for uninsured residents of chippewa, luce and mackinac counties of michigan by coordinating health care providers.

Health
10
Michigan Legal Services

Provide free legal assistance to indigent and low income persons

Crime & Legal
11
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
12
Mymichigan Home Care

Creating healthy communities - together

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation for Muskegon County and the most unlike its peers is Fruitport Lions Charities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%4%<5yr13%4%5–10yr20%13%10–20yr17%39%20–35yr15%22%35–55yr14%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr20%0%10–20yr17%98%20–35yr15%1%35–55yr14%1%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/29
the rest of the field
11%
468/4,423

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MUSKEGON COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT — $26,709,160 · HealthMUSKEGON COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT+2 more — $10,000 · HealthOSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION OF WEST MI — $103,446 · OtherMT ZION CHURCH OF GOD IN CHRIST — $44,900 · OtherMUSKEGON RESCUE MISSION — $14,400 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN — $10,500 · OtherSEVEN STEPS UP — $10,000 · OtherWHITEHALL DISTRICT SCHOOLS — $10,000 · OtherMontague Area Public Schools — $10,000 · Other+7 more — $41,350 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY — $177,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE 211 — $30,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE PROJECT INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesWINGS OF MERCY INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesPIONEER RESOURCES — $9,000 · Human ServicesSenior Resources of West Michigan — $5,000 · Human ServicesMISSION FOR AREA PEOPLE — $48,500 · ReligionBETHANY HOUSING MINISTRIES INC — $21,000 · Housing & ShelterKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC — $13,000 · Food & NutritionAGEWELL SERVICES OF WEST MICHIGAN — $5,000 · Food & NutritionMUSKEGON LAKESHORE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Environment
Health$26,719,160Other$244,596Philanthropy$177,500Human Services$74,000Religion$48,500Housing & Shelter$21,000Food & Nutrition$18,000Environment$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMUSKEGON COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT — $26,709,160 over 9y, 85% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MUSKEGON COUNTY — $177,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetOSTEOPATHIC FOUNDATION OF WEST MI — $103,446 over 2y, 6.2% of budgetMISSION FOR AREA PEOPLE — $48,500 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS LINE OF THE LAKESHORE 211 — $30,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetBETHANY HOUSING MINISTRIES INC — $21,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE HOPE PROJECT INC — $20,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetKIDS' FOOD BASKET INC — $13,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST MICHIGAN — $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF MERCY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPIONEER RESOURCES — $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSKEGON PREGNANCY SERVICES — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMUSKEGON LAKESHORE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAGEWELL SERVICES OF WEST MICHIGAN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUSKEGON YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSenior Resources of West Michigan — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRUITPORT LIONS CHARITIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Muskegon CountyMI44.6× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Muskegon County · United Way of the Lakeshore · Muskegon Community Health Project · Women's Division Chamber of Commerce · Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Inc · Michigan Health Endowment Fund · Consumers Energy Foundation · Osteopathic Foundation of West Mi · Senior Resources of West Michigan · Fremont Area Community Foundation · The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mercy Health Partners funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph