· Public charity
Ment Ltd
Aims to educate, train and inspire excellence in young culinary professionals and champions the diversity and creativity of the traditions and quality of cuisine in america.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTHERN SMOKE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 71% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improve the lives of restaurant workers
To donate money to other not-for-profit agencies
The Culinary Trust gives culinary professionals the tools and opportunites to understand and act on critical issues in the world of food. The mission is fulfilled through educational programs, grants for hunger alleviation, culinary…
To provide financial assistance to employees of dessert holdings most significantly impacted by the covid-19 pandemic.
To provide scholarships to students entering or continuing in the field of Culinary Arts in Hawaii.
Provides financial support and mentorship to food entrepreneurs, matching them with funding and providing access to experienced professionals as they embark on establishing new restaurants, markets, cafes, bakeries, and other local food…
How this is measured
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HAWAII AG AND CULINARY ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds LEE INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds Heart of the House Foundation ↗
- Who funds HAND IN HAND DANIEL BOULUD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JACQUES PEPIN FOUNDATION THE ↗
- Who funds KELLER RESTAURANT RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Southern Smoke Foundation ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Ment Ltd funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ment Ltd. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Ment Ltd?
Find your warmest path to Ment Ltd through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Ment Ltd’s filings →