Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mendenhall Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$210kReligion$49kFood & Nutrition$43kInternational$43kHealth$37kHuman Services$33kCivil Rights$24kHousing & Shelter$23kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING WATER FOR THE WORLD$2,426
SANCTUARY ARTS SCHOOL$2,000
GOOD SPORTS$1,500
WOMEN'S REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS PROJECT$1,500
MAKE A WISH$1,500
SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN$1,250
HAITI EDUCATION FUND INC$1,200
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$1,000
CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK$1,000
TUPELO LEE HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
UNITED TO BEAT MALARIA$1,000
GROWING UP KNOWING$1,000
STEWPOT$1,000
TREES FOR THE FUTURE$500
STEWPOT ALLIANCE OF DALLAS$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SUNNYBROOK CHILDREN'S HOME: $2k → 11%ECHO: $2k → 6%THE FAMILY PLACE: $500 → 14%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 22%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $3k → 14%CADDO COUNCIL ON AGING: $1k → 22%BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
NY
MA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
DC
LA
MS
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$448k · 43 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

43 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 29 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
33

Total granted

$448k
$72k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+24%

Still filing today

58%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LW
    LIVING WATERS FOR THE WORLD
    8× · 2017–2024 · $203k · revenue +110%
  • DC
    DALLAS CASA
    5× · 2017–2023 · $17k · revenue +21%
  • PH
    PROVIDENCE HOUSE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $12k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF SHREVEPORT LA
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
  • SI
    SOME INC
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue -16%
  • DH
    DORCHEAT HISTORCAL MUSEUM
    one grant, 2018 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
2
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
3
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
Pact Inc

Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

International
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
7
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
8
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
9
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
10
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
11
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
12
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Animal Rescue and ShelterFood Banks and PantriesYouth Sports ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Policy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr16%26%20–35yr13%41%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%56%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr16%13%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%10%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/46
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,519

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
36/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIVING WATERS FOR THE WORLD — $203,358 · InternationalLIVING WATERS FOR THE WORLDInternational Rescue Committee INC — $12,000 · International+4 more — $12,063 · InternationalFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH SHREVEPORT — $25,494 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH SHREVEPORTJOURNEY TO DREAM — $14,460 · OtherJOURNEY TO DREAMSTEWPOT — $11,602 · OtherHAITI EDUCATION FUND INC — $9,700 · OtherSCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN — $9,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF SHREVEPORT LA — $7,678 · OtherCAMP FERN LEGACY INC — $8,150 · Other+58 more — $140,913 · Other+58 moreDALLAS CASA — $16,641 · Civil RightsNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $5,900 · Civil RightsNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK — $10,910 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $4,000 · Food & NutritionCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $4,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA — $9,066 · PhilanthropySERVE YOUR CITY — $4,091 · PhilanthropyBOSSIER PARISH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · PhilanthropyAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $8,840 · AnimalsTUPELO LEE HUMANE SOCIETY — $4,000 · AnimalsPROVIDENCE HOUSE — $12,090 · Community Improvement
International$227,421Other$226,997Civil Rights$22,541Food & Nutrition$18,910Philanthropy$15,157Animals$12,840Community Improvement$12,090

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLIVING WATERS FOR THE WORLD — $203,358 over 8y, 5.5% of budgetDALLAS CASA — $16,641 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE HOUSE — $12,090 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK — $10,910 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA — $9,066 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC — $8,840 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP FERN LEGACY INC — $8,150 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSOME INC — $6,098 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $5,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY COMPASS — $5,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetThe Mustard Seed Inc — $5,030 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $4,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPOLARIS PROJECT — $4,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSERVE YOUR CITY — $4,091 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOOD SPORTS INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTUPELO LEE HUMANE SOCIETY — $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION — $3,118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $3,010 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKNER INTERNATIONAL — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC — $2,530 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSANCTUARY ARTS SCHOOL — $2,225 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $2,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA — $2,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNNYBROOK CHILDREN'S HOME INC — $2,010 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetATHLETES FOR CHANGE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PRAXIS PROJECT INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCADDO COUNCIL ON AGING — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSSIER PARISH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetECHO INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC — $1,033 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC — $965 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Place — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $314 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUEST — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LIVING WATERS FOR THE WORLD
  • Who funds DALLAS CASA
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE HOUSE
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC
  • Who funds NORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NORTH LOUISIANA
  • Who funds AUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC
  • Who funds CAMP FERN LEGACY INC
  • Who funds SOME INC
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC
  • Who funds FAMILY COMPASS
  • Who funds The Mustard Seed Inc
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds POLARIS PROJECT
  • Who funds SERVE YOUR CITY
  • Who funds GOOD SPORTS INC
  • Who funds TUPELO LEE HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
  • Who funds GENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT
  • Who funds BUCKNER INTERNATIONAL

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family FoundationLA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carolyn W & Charles T Beaird Family Foundation · Community Foundation of North Louisiana · Grayson Foundation Inc · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · The Scott Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · The Gap Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mendenhall Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mendenhall Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mendenhall Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph