Skip to content

Georgia · Public charity

Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc

MOST exists to provide platforms & opportunities for men to learn activate & invest in the fight against human trafficking and in the support of survivors. MOST has identified a collective of best-in-class partners in prevention rescue and recovery and funds these partners.

$1.8M
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
3
Itemized grants FY2024
10
Organizations funded FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$1.7M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$345,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$1,225,000
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$843k
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$1.4MYouth Development$340kCrime & Legal$240kHuman Services$130kCommunity Improvement$55kReligion$38kInternational$36kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Proximus LLC$1,555,0002n/a
House of Cherith Inc$1,431,000235%
Guardian Group$239,500221%
E3 Ranch Foundation Inc$130,00016%
City of Refuge Communities Inc$55,00015%
Wind River Ministries Inc$28,00011%
Beyond Uganda$25,50013%
City of Refuge$10,00010%

Plus 2 recipients with no EIN on record ($20k), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc?

Find your warmest path to Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc

How much does Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc give?
Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc reported 3 itemized grants totaling $1,723,000, out of $1,757,700 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing.
What does Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2024, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (41%), Youth Development (10%), Crime & Legal (7%).
Who are Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2024: Proximus LLC ($1.6M), House of Cherith Inc ($1.4M), Guardian Group ($240k).
Which funders back the same organizations as Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc based?
Men Opposing Sex Trafficking Inc is based in GA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Men Opposing Sex Trafficking’s filings →

More from the funding graph