Skip to content

· Private foundation

Melvyn and Barbara Ciment Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2019
30
Grants FY2019
5
States reached
$9k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

58% of Melvyn and Barbara Ciment Family Foundation Inc’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 14 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year Melvyn and Barbara Ciment Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 17 organizations, $31k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
’17
16
’18
17
’19
14
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Religion$54kEducation$51kPhilanthropy$42kHealth$14kInternational$8kYouth Development$1kHuman Services$600Public Benefit$200Other$0
02FY2019 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$350
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY$8,600
AMIT$5,000
KEMP MILL SYNAGOGUE$3,800
SULAM$2,680
CHAI LIFELINE$1,800
BONEI OLAM$1,360
YOUNG ISRAEL SHOMREI EMUNAH$1,200
MIKVAH EMUNAH SOCIETY$1,110
BIKUR CHOLIM OF GREATER WASHINGTON$850
YAD YEHUDAH OF GREATER WASHINGTON$750
GREATER WASHINGTON COMMUNITY KOLLEL$720
AMERICAN FRIENDS ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES$500
EZER MITZION$500
Individual grant recipient$400
TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON$350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BONEI OLAM: $1k → 20%OHEL Childrens Home and Family Services: $250 → 20%OHEL Childrens Home and Family Services: $100 → 20%SULAM: $3k → 8%SULAM: $2k → 8%SULAM: $680 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 26% of Melvyn and Barbara Ciment Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Melvyn and Barbara Ciment Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121k · 26 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2019, 7 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
12

Total granted

$121k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+78%

Still filing today

42%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MJ
    MELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY
    3× · 2018–2020 · $18k · revenue +67%
  • BA
    BEN AND ESTHER ROSENBLOOM HILLEL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT UNIVERSITY OF MD
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • SI
    Sulam Inc
    3× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • MS
    MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOODgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +28%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JERUSALEM KOLLEL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $500 · revenue +65%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLL EL TORAS ZERAIM JERUSALEM INC
    one grant, 2018 · $360 · revenue -42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
5
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
6
University of Judaism Foundation
—
7
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Torah Ore Seminary

To promote the furtherance of jewish religious and rabbinic education on a college and graduate level in israel and to increase the dissemination of scholarly research works in the fields of torah, talmud and halacha.

Education
9
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
10
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
11
Moskowitz Prize for Zionism Inc
—
12
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Alyn Hospitalinc; the most unlike its peers is Telemachus and Irene Demoulas Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEMP MILL SYNAGOGUE INC: $17,770 · OtherKEMP MILL SYNAGOGUE INCAMIT: $17,700 · OtherAMITCHABAD OF SILVER SPRING: $14,150 · OtherCHABAD OF SILVER SPRINGCHAI LIFELINE: $7,900 · OtherCHAI LIFELINEYOUNG ISRAEL SHOMREI EMUNAH: $5,900 · OtherYOUNG ISRAEL SHOMREI EMUNAHBEN AND ESTHER ROSENBLOOM HILLEL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT UNIVERSITY OF MD: $5,400 · OtherBEN AND ESTHER ROSENBLOOM HILLEL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE A…AMERICAN FRIENDS ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $3,500 · Other+35 more: $14,207 · Other+35 moreFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $41,259 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITAB…BIKUR CHOLIM OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $3,200 · Community ImprovementBIKUR CHOLIM OF GREATER WASHI…MELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY: $17,800 · ReligionMELVIN J BER…+3 more: $960 · ReligionTHE TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $8,900 · EducationMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $500 · Education+1 more: $50 · EducationSulam Inc: $5,360 · Human ServicesBonei Olam Inc: $1,360 · Human ServicesOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $350 · Human ServicesENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH: $4,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $200 · Public BenefitDAILY GIVING INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTelemachus and Irene Demoulas Family Foundation: $180 · Philanthropy
Other$86,527Community Improvement$44,459Religion$18,760Education$9,450Human Services$7,070Public Benefit$4,200Philanthropy$1,180

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $41,259 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY: $17,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $8,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBEN AND ESTHER ROSENBLOOM HILLEL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT UNIVERSITY OF MD: $5,400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSulam Inc: $5,360 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC: $3,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $1,360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAILY GIVING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JERUSALEM KOLLEL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEZER MIZION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHEATON VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S INN AT NIH INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNFLOWER BAKERY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ALYN HOSPITALINC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRELIGIOUS ZIONISTS OF AMERICA MIZRACHI HAPOEL HAMIZRACHI INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds MELVIN J BERMAN HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE TORAH SCHOOL OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds BEN AND ESTHER ROSENBLOOM HILLEL CENTER FOR JEWISH LIFE AT UNIVERSITY OF MD ↗
  • Who funds Sulam Inc ↗
  • Who funds ENDOWMENT FOR MIDDLE EAST TRUTH ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds DAILY GIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE JERUSALEM KOLLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds EZER MIZION ↗
  • Who funds SAVE A CHILD'S HEART FOUNDATION US INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF KOLL EL TORAS ZERAIM JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds Telemachus and Irene Demoulas Family Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WHEATON VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dennis Berman Family Foundation IncMD28.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dennis Berman Family Foundation Inc · Brian and Dafna Berman Family Foundation Inc · Mayberg Foundation Inc · The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Berman Charitable Trust · Leslie & Samuel Kaplan Family Foundation · Edith & Michael Gelfand Foundation Inc · The Gary & Carol Berman Family Foundation Inc · The Colburn Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Melvyn and Barbara Ciment Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Melvyn and Barbara Ciment Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Children's Inn at Nih Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Melvin J Berman Hebrew Academy: 2% of income from government
  • The Torah School of Greater Washington Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Melvyn and Barbara Ciment Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph