Skip to content

· Private foundation

Melvin Huter Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$75k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$201kFood & Nutrition$110kHealth$93kHousing & Shelter$53kEducation$29kRecreation & Sports$10kCrime & Legal$8kYouth Development$6k
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k15 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
IDAHO FOODBANK$10,000
JESSE TREE$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$10,000
ADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE$5,000
ELKS REHAB HOSPITAL$5,000
WOMENS & CHILDREN ALLIANCE$5,000
VALLEY WOMENS & CHILDREN SHELTER$5,000
BOISE VA HOSPITAL$5,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF BOISE$2,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$2,500
NAMPA FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER$2,500
SALVATION ARMY$2,500
NAMPA COMMUNITY FAMILY SHELTER$2,500
ST VINCENT FOOD PANTRY$2,500
AMERICAN LEGION$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%WOMENS & CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $5k → 8%WOMENS & CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $5k → 8%WOMENS & CHILDREN ALLIANCE: $5k → 8%ADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $5k → 11%ADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $5k → 11%ADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$478k · 19 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$478k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+98%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IE
    IDAHO ELKS REHAB HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $40k · revenue +18%
  • IF
    IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE
    4× · 2019–2024 · $40k · revenue +35%
  • NS
    NAMPA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $21k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • BR
    BOISE RESCUE MISSION
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • FC
    FULL CIRCLE HEALTH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +98%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
2
Indigenous Idaho Alliance Inc
Civil Rights
3
Idaho Falls Fraternal Order of Police Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
4
Ywca of Fort Dodge Ia

We are a state licensed substance abuse facility which functions to provide a clinically managed residence treatment center for women and women with children.

—
5
Idaho Medical Association Foundation Inc
Health
6
Family Health Services Corporation

Family Health Services, a community health center, makes high-quality culturally sensitive, primary medical and dental care, behavioral health, and social services affordable and accessible for the people of South Central Idaho.

Health
7
Brave Hearts Idaho
Arts & Culture
8
Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc
Health
9
International Federation for Family Health
—
10
The Phoenix House Sexual Assault & Domestic Violence Resource Center

To provide education, awareness and prevention information throughout the communities of Lea County and services such as forensic exams and advocacy, for victims/survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, strangulation, child injury,…

Crime & Legal
11
Idaho Operation Lifesaver
—
12
Northeastern Utah Friends Against Family Violence

Friends Against Family Violence (FAFV) is a community based nonprofit domestic violence program. FAFV provides services, shelter, crisis intervention, and prevention in the Tri-County of Uintah, Duchesne, and Daggett. We provide services…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Full Circle Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is Nampa Schools Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

7CARES IDAHO SHARES: $100,000 · Other7CARES IDAHO SHARESMEALS ON WHEELS: $60,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSBOISE VA HOSPITAL: $37,500 · OtherBOISE VA HOSPITALTHE SALVATION ARMY: $30,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYJESSE TREE: $30,000 · OtherJESSE TREEBOISE RESCUE MISSION: $25,000 · OtherBOISE RESCUE MISSIONThe American Legion: $15,500 · OtherVALLEY WOMENS & CHILDREN SHELTER: $15,000 · Other+5 more: $42,500 · Other+5 moreIDAHO ELKS REHAB HOSPITAL INC: $40,000 · HealthIDAHO ELKS R…Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc: $10,000 · HealthRonald McDon…FULL CIRCLE HEALTH INC: $5,000 · HealthFULL CIRCLE …IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $40,000 · Food & NutritionWomen's and Children's Alliance: $15,000 · Human ServicesADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $15,000 · Human ServicesNAMPA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $6,000 · Youth Development
Other$355,500Health$55,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Human Services$30,000Philanthropy$21,000Youth Development$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDAHO ELKS REHAB HOSPITAL INC: $40,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNAMPA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $21,000 over 6y, 8.0% of budgetThe American Legion: $15,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's and Children's Alliance: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc: $10,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFULL CIRCLE HEALTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IDAHO ELKS REHAB HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NAMPA SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The American Legion ↗
  • Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES AGAINST FAMILY VIOLENCE ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FULL CIRCLE HEALTH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Community Foundation IncID15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Melvin Huter Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Melvin Huter Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Melvin Huter’s filings →

    More from the funding graph