Skip to content

· Private foundation

Melmac Education Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
151
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$422k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$8.4MEmployment$4.0MScience & Tech$385kCommunity Improvement$176kEnvironment$64kYouth Development$27kHealth$18kPublic Benefit$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 151 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k140 grants · $280k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $389k
  • $250k+2 grants · $828k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$41M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GENERATION US$421,681
GENERATION US$406,598
GENERATION US$174,253
JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES$58,000
COLLEGE BOARD$56,938
EDUCATE MAINE$50,000
EDUCATE MAINE$50,000
GENERATION US$40,500
EDUCATE MAINE$39,000
CONY HIGH SCHOOL$15,273
EDUCATE MAINE$10,000
EDUCATE MAINE$3,000
BRUNSWICK HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
GRAY-NEW GLOUCESTER HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
LAKE REGION HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOSTER CTE CENTER: $40k → 14%GENERATION MAINE: $310k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $260k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $252k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $223k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $219k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $191k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $179k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $171k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $150k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $150k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $150k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $142k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $135k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $134k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $133k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $113k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $109k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $102k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $100k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $91k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $87k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $84k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $78k → 12%GEN US: $77k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $75k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $75k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $75k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $75k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $58k → 12%JOBS FOR MAINE'S GRADUATES: $58k → 12%GENERATION MAINE: $48k → 12%MASFAA: $40k → 15%MASFAA: $40k → 15%MASFAA: $40k → 15%MASFAA: $40k → 15%MASFAA: $40k → 15%MASFAA: $40k → 15%EDUCATE MAINE: $110k → 7%EDUCATE MAINE: $70k → 7%EDUCATE MAINE: $60k → 7%EDUCATE MAINE: $51k → 7%EDUCATE MAINE: $50k → 7%EDUCATE MAINE: $50k → 7%EDUCATE MAINE: $50k → 7%EDUCATE MAINE: $50k → 7%EDUCATE MAINE: $50k → 7%EDUCATE MAINE: $50k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 311 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

311 repeat relationships: 133 still active in FY2025, 178 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

311
65

Total granted

$14M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+27%

Still filing today

11%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationEmploymentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GU
    Generation US
    7× · 2018–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +263% · 37% of their budget
  • JF
    Jobs for Maine's Graduates Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +107%
  • CB
    College Board
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $659k
  • KV
    KENNEBEC VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $27k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MAINE FARMINGTON
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bridgton Academy

To provide a program for young men in a unique, one-year postgraduate environment to prepare for the rigors of college and beyond.

Education
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
The President and Trustees of Colby College

to provide a rigorous and transformative liberal arts education that prepares students to become thoughtful, engaged citizens.

Education
4
Suffield Academy

Suffield Academy is a coeducational independent secondary school serving a diverse student body of day and boarding students from across the United States and from many foreign counties. The school is grounded in a tradition of academic…

Education
5
Concord Christian Academy

Concord Christian Academy is a life preparatory educational institution that works in harmony with families to promote the spiritual, intellectual, emotional, physical and creative growth of students, empowering them to live for the glory…

Education
6
Groton School

Groton School's mission is to inspire lives of character, scholarship, leadership, and service within a diverse, inclusive, and close-knit community.

Education
7
Harpswell Coastal Academy Inc

Hca is a public charter school offering rigorous, personalized, project- based education to maine students in grades 5-12.

—
8
Doane Academy

Private School

—
9
Cape Fear Academy

To operate a private school for pre-kindergarten through grade 12 in Wilmington, NC

Education
10
Portsmouth Christian Academy

Portsmouth christian academy exists to honor god joyfully by inspiring students to maximize their god-given potential.

—
11
Baxter Academies of Maine

The baxter academies of maine is an educational institution that established and operates public charter schools in maine.

Education
12
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Yarmouth Academy; the most unlike its peers is Penobscot Christian School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 381 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
35/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Jobs for Maine's Graduates Inc: $1,792,025 · OtherJobs for Maine's Graduates IncIndividual grant recipient: $658,648 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+181 more: $6,337,673 · Other+181 moreGeneration US: $3,317,009 · EmploymentGeneration USCollege Board: $1,032,087 · EducationCollege BoardEducate Maine: $662,550 · EducationEducate MaineTrustees of Saint Joseph's College Saint Joseph's College of Maine: $73,834 · Education+13 more: $384,692 · Education+13 more
Other$8,788,346Employment$3,317,009Education$2,153,163

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGeneration US: $3,317,009 over 7y, 37% of budgetJobs for Maine's Graduates Inc: $1,792,025 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetCollege Board: $1,032,087 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEducate Maine: $662,550 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetTrustees of Saint Joseph's College Saint Joseph's College of Maine: $73,834 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetERSKINE ACADEMY: $58,900 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of New England: $57,514 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS COLLEGE: $49,824 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHusson University: $48,754 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEE ACADEMY: $43,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMaine Central Institute: $29,700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLINCOLN ACADEMY: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKENTS HILL SCHOOL: $18,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGeorge Stevens Academy: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON ACADEMY: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH YARMOUTH ACADEMY: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHebron Academy Incorporated: $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PORTLAND CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $18,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWAYNFLETE SCHOOL: $18,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOXCROFT ACADEMY TRUSTEES OF: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGOULD ACADEMY: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Generation US ↗
  • Who funds Jobs for Maine's Graduates Inc ↗
  • Who funds College Board ↗
  • Who funds Educate Maine ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Saint Joseph's College Saint Joseph's College of Maine ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF THE ATLANTIC ↗
  • Who funds ERSKINE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds University of New England ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME51.8× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Davis Family Foundation · Full Plates Full Potential · Oak Grove School · Harold Alfond Foundation · Reny Charitable Foundation · Frederic E Skillings Trust Uw · Fidelity Foundation · Simmons Foundation - PerkinsThompson · Bangor Savings Bank Foundation · Cochran Gifford a Tr Uind · Crockett Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Melmac Education Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Melmac Education Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Trustees of Clark University: 2% of income from government
  • Western New England University: 0% of income from government
  • Wheaton College: 0% of income from government
  • Emmanuel College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Melmac Education Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Melmac Education Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 381 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Melmac Education’s filings →

More from the funding graph