· Private foundation
Meinig Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $337k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $962k
- $250k+3 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CORNELL UNIVERSITY | $1,525,000 |
| MILLENNIUM SCHOOL | $900,000 |
| CREATIVE ACTION | $565,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS | $220,000 |
| FAMILY LEGACY | $137,312 |
| WATERLOO GREENWAY CONSERVANCY | $120,000 |
| THE STORY CHURCH | $110,000 |
| ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL | $100,000 |
| BREAKTHROUGH CENTRAL TEXAS | $100,000 |
| TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| AUSTIN TOGETHER FUND | $75,000 |
| ASPEN MUSIC FESTIVAL & SCHOOL | $45,000 |
| CHALLENGE SUCCESS | $37,000 |
| NATIONAL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| ST IGNATIUS COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $558k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Cornell University7× · 2018–2024 · $7.1M · revenue +49%- CACreative Action7× · 2018–2024 · $795k · revenue +5%
- CHCOVENANT HOUSE TEXAS6× · 2018–2023 · $535k · revenue +62%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $120k
- GEGreenhouse E3one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +24%
- AIATHLETES IN ACTIONone grant, 2023 · $65k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Education and Research
American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…
Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
See Disclosure Above.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of San Francisco and the most unlike its peers is Every Org. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds Family Legacy Missions International ↗
- Who funds Creative Action ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS ↗
- Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS ↗
- Who funds THE ALOHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH ↗
- Who funds THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds ST ANDREW'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MINDFUL SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds University of Michigan ↗
- Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ↗
- Who funds ASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WATERLOO GREENWAY CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Greenhouse E3 ↗
- Who funds Challenge Success ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN TOGETHER FUND ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds THE METHODIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THEATRE ASPEN ↗
- Who funds Global Compassion Coalition ↗
- Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
- Who funds ASPEN ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds The Pachamama Alliance ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Moody Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Austin Community Foundation Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Mr and Mrs Nelson Rusche Foundation · The Webber Family Foundation · I a O'Shaughnessy Foundation · Shield-Ayres Foundation · Topfer Family Foundation · The Powell Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Meinig Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
- The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.