Skip to content

· Private foundation

Meehleis Sinclair Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$26kHealth$19kYouth Development$17kHuman Services$14kPhilanthropy$7kPublic Safety & Disaster$6kEducation$5kHousing & Shelter$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$514k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCI$10,000
HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN$3,000
LODI HIGH SCHOOL$1,600
LODI FIRE FOUNDATION$1,300
VARIOUS QUALIFIED CHARITIES 500 EAC$1,100
KIWANIS OF GREATER LODI$1,000
LODI POLICE FOUNDATION$1,000
WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES$750
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WAYFINDER FAMILY SERVICES: $750 → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $5k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $5k → 12%HOSPICE OF SAN JOAQUIN: $3k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71k · 13 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$71k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+59%

Still filing today

46%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $750 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $15k · revenue +33%
  • LH
    LODI HOUSE
    2× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • LP
    LODI POLICE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +108%

Funded once

  • LB
    LODI BOOSTERS OF BOYSGIRLS SPORTS B
    one grant, 2021 · $15k
  • WO
    WORLD OF WONDERS SCIENCE MUSEUM
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -3%
  • LM
    LODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +163%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Lodi Historical Society Inc

Preserve, Protect and Maintain Lodi History

—
3
Lucile Salter Packard Children's Hospital At Stanford

Organization's primary exempt purpose the specific and primary purposes of lucile salter packard children's hospital at stanford ("lpch") are to support, benefit and further the charitable, scientific, and educational purposes of the board…

Health
4
Lodi Rotary Foundation

A nonprofit public benefit organization to provide funding for varied projects and programs such as scholarships, youth oriented activities, and projects that specifically aid the handicapped and the aged.

Youth Development
5
People Assisting Lodi Shelter

The organization is dedicated to improving the welfare of companion animals in the city of lodi by increasing adoptions, recuding animal suffering, and by providing the highest level of humane care, there by ultimately reducing the number…

Animals
6
Lodi Memorial Hospital Association Inc

Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

Health
7
Los Altos Journalism Foundation
—
8
Preservation Lomice
Religion
9
Lodi Family Center

Family support

Human Services
10
Lodi Christian School

Lodi christian school's mission statement is: l: loving god and others c: christ-centered education and worship s: serving christ and our community

Education
11
Lowell Observatory

The mission of lowell observatory is to pursue the study of astronomy, especially the study of our solar system and its evolution; to conduct pure research in astronomical phenomena; and to maintain quality public education and outreach…

Science & Tech
12
The Womans Club of Lodi

Civic & charitable enterprise.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lodi Fire Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Wayfinder Family Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LODI BOOSTERS OF BOYSGIRLS SPORTS B: $14,872 · OtherLODI BOOSTERS OF BOYSGIRLS SPORTS BLOEL SENIOR CENTER: $10,379 · OtherLOEL SENIOR CENTERVARIOUS QUALIFIED CHARITIES 500 EAC: $5,025 · OtherVARIOUS QUALIFIED CHARITIES 500 EACLODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherLODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INCLODI HIGH SCHOOL: $3,950 · OtherLODI HIGH SCHOOLKIWANIS OF GREATER LODI: $3,000 · OtherKIWANIS OF GREATER LODILODI HIGH SCHOOL SOBER GRAD NIGHT: $2,500 · OtherCHILD ABUSE COUNCIL OF SAN JOAQUIN: $2,000 · OtherLODI-TOKAY ROTARY CLUB: $2,000 · Other+2 more: $2,214 · OtherTHUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATI…WORLD OF WONDERS SCIENCE MUSEUM: $11,000 · Arts & CultureWORLD OF WONDERS SCIENCE MUS…Hospice of San Joaquin: $13,025 · Human ServicesHospice of San…Wayfinder Family Services: $750 · Human ServicesWayfinder Fami…LODI FIRE FOUNDATION: $6,100 · Public Safety & DisasterLODI HOUSE: $5,000 · Housing & ShelterLODI POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · PhilanthropyST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $625 · Health
Other$50,940Arts & Culture$26,000Human Services$13,775Public Safety & Disaster$6,100Housing & Shelter$5,000Philanthropy$2,000Health$625

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHospice of San Joaquin: $13,025 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD OF WONDERS SCIENCE MUSEUM: $11,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLODI FIRE FOUNDATION: $6,100 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetLODI HOUSE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLODI POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetLODI-TOKAY ROTARY CLUB: $2,000 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetWayfinder Family Services: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $625 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of San Joaquin ↗
  • Who funds WORLD OF WONDERS SCIENCE MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds LODI FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LODI HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LODI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LODI POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LODI-TOKAY ROTARY CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Wayfinder Family Services ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cortopassi Family FoundationCA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Crete Family Foundation · The 54 Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Meehleis Sinclair Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Meehleis Sinclair Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Meehleis Sinclair Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph