Skip to content

· Public charity

Mecosta - Osceola United Way Inc

Conduct an annual united way campaign to raise contributions from mecosta and osceola residents and business for grant making to community health, welfare and charitable organizations that offer programs centered around meeting critical needs and providing youth mentoring to mecosta and osceola residents.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$394kHuman Services$381kPhilanthropy$170kHealth$85kCrime & Legal$30kHousing & Shelter$30kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $46,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $50,801 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $4,801 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$181k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OSCEOLA COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING$10,000
MECOSTA COUNTY COMMISSION ON AGING$10,000
MO INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL DISTRICT$10,000
PROJECT STARBURST$8,000
WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE)$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $12k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE: $43k → 20%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $8k → 14%WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE: $30k → 20%WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE: $30k → 20%WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE: $30k → 20%WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE: $25k → 20%WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE: $23k → 20%WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE: $21k → 20%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $20k → 20%WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE: $19k → 20%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $10k → 20%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $10k → 20%MECOSTA OSCEOLA YOUTH ATTENTION CEN: $9k → 20%WOMEN'S INFORMATION SERVICE (WISE): $8k → 20%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $8k → 20%MECOSTA OSCEOLA YOUTH ATTENTION CEN: $6k → 20%HOSPICE OF MICHIGAN INC: $6k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+141%

Still filing today

85%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WI
    WOMENS INFORMATION SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $229k · revenue +75%
  • PS
    PROJECT STARBURST
    9× · 2017–2025 · $168k · revenue +37% · 35% of their budget
  • HO
    Hospice of Michigan Inc
    5× · 2017–2021 · $53k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2017 · $18k
  • HH
    HERSEYS HOUSE OF HOPEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +126%
  • MM
    MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +141%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Housing Services of Mid Michigan

To assist people with low or moderate income to obtain safe and affordable housing

Housing & Shelter
2
Michigan Legal Services

Provide free legal assistance to indigent and low income persons

Crime & Legal
3
Midmichigan Health Services

To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.

Health
4
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
5
United Way of Marquette County

Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…

—
6
Area Agency On Aging of Western Michigan Inc

Through internal expertise, external partnerships, and advocacy, the area agency on aging of western michigan provides older adults, adults with disabilities, and their caregivers equitable access to services that promote independence and…

Human Services
7
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

—
8
Feeding America West Michigan

We gather and distribute food to relieve hunger and increase food security in west michigan and the upper peninsula. contributions and net assets consist primarily of donated food for distribution.

—
9
Macomb Residential Opportunities Inc

To serve individuals with disabilities by providing residential and personal support in a manner that promotes individual dignity, community integration and quality of life

—
10
Washtenaw Housing Alliance

The mission of the washtenaw housing alliance is to end homelessness in our community.

Housing & Shelter
11
Mi Lewis Social Services

Emergency assistance in the form of food, utilities, rent, etc.

—
12
Senior Resources of West Michigan

Provide comprehensive and coordinated services to the aging population of Muskegon, Ottawa, and Oceana Counties

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc; the most unlike its peers is Herseys House of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROJECT STARBURST: $168,366 · OtherPROJECT STARBURSTOSCEOLA COUNTY: $155,459 · OtherOSCEOLA COUNTYMECOSTA COUNTY SENIOR CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS INC: $143,959 · OtherMECOSTA COUNTY SENIOR CENTER BOARD OF DIRECTORS INCMECOSTA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $44,146 · OtherMECOSTA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGMecosta County Habitat for Humanity: $30,000 · Other+3 more: $35,000 · Other+3 moreWOMENS INFORMATION SERVICES INC: $228,549 · Human ServicesWOMENS INFORMATION SERVICES INCHospice of Michigan Inc: $52,760 · Human ServicesHospice of Michigan IncAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & It…MECOSTA OSCEOLA YOUTH ATTENTION CENTER INC: $14,500 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF THE LAKESHORE: $100,908 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF TH…UNITED WAY OF MASON COUNTY: $69,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MA…TEN SIXTEEN RECOVERY NETWORK: $32,610 · HealthLegal Aid of Western Michigan: $22,500 · Crime & LegalHERSEYS HOUSE OF HOPE: $7,500 · Crime & LegalMANNA PANTRY OF BIG RAPIDS INC: $6,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$576,930Human Services$325,809Philanthropy$169,908Health$32,610Crime & Legal$30,000Food & Nutrition$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWOMENS INFORMATION SERVICES INC: $228,549 over 9y, 6.2% of budgetPROJECT STARBURST: $168,366 over 9y, 35% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE LAKESHORE: $100,908 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MASON COUNTY: $69,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetHospice of Michigan Inc: $52,760 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMECOSTA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $44,146 over 5y, 6.7% of budgetTEN SIXTEEN RECOVERY NETWORK: $32,610 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMecosta County Habitat for Humanity: $30,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetLegal Aid of Western Michigan: $22,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMECOSTA OSCEOLA YOUTH ATTENTION CENTER INC: $14,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANNA PANTRY OF BIG RAPIDS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WOMENS INFORMATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT STARBURST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE LAKESHORE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF MASON COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Hospice of Michigan Inc ↗
  • Who funds MECOSTA COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds TEN SIXTEEN RECOVERY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds Mecosta County Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds Legal Aid of Western Michigan ↗
  • Who funds MECOSTA OSCEOLA YOUTH ATTENTION CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HERSEYS HOUSE OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds MID MICHIGAN COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA PANTRY OF BIG RAPIDS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fremont Area Community FoundationMI22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fremont Area Community Foundation · Feeding America West Michigan · Consumers Energy Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mecosta - Osceola United Way Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mecosta - Osceola United Way Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mecosta - Osceola United Way Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mecosta - Osceola United Way Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mecosta - Osceola United Way’s filings →

    More from the funding graph