Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Meadows Road Foundation (Fka Coydog Foundation)

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
88
Grants FY2024still arriving
18
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 53% of MEADOWS ROAD FOUNDATION (FKA COYDOG FOUNDATION)’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 88 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k52 grants · $158k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $405k
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$5,000
Median grant
18
States reached
$42M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$250,000
CHILDREN'S RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE$211,728
CHILDREN'S RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE$206,294
CHILDREN'S RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE$183,216
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$180,000
CHILDREN'S RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE$175,793
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA$173,869
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$150,000
CITIZEN OPINION$100,000
BRAZELTON TOUCHPOINTS FOUNDATION$100,000
GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE$60,000
NATIONAL COALITION AGAINST CENSORSHIP$50,000
SEEGER- BARTLETT SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$50,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS$50,000
INSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $243k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THINK SMALL: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE - NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES: $10k → 14%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES INC: $3k → 10%THINK SMALL: $10k → 14%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $10k → 14%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $3k → 10%THINK SMALL: $10k → 14%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $10k → 14%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $3k → 10%THINK SMALL: $10k → 14%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $10k → 14%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $3k → 10%THINK SMALL: $10k → 14%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $10k → 14%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $3k → 10%THINK SMALL: $10k → 14%YMCA OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10k → 10%ZERO TO THREE: $10k → 14%CHANGING PERSPECTIVES: $3k → 10%THINK SMALL: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $10k → 14%ZERO TO THREE: $1k → 14%POWER TO DECIDE: $5k → 14%POWER TO DECIDE: $1k → 14%POWER TO DECIDE: $500 → 14%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $500 → 17%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK: $5k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK: $5k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK: $5k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER NEW YORK: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$18M · 112 repeat orgs$516k to everyone else

112 repeat relationships — 66 still active in FY2024, 46 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

112
47

Total granted

$18M
$431k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+54%

Still filing today

72%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +12%
  • WU
    WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $466k · revenue +40%
  • BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $419k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • BT
    BRAZELTON TOUCHPOINTS PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $150k · revenue +245%
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +49%
  • PR
    POLITICAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +291%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
4
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of Manhattan and the most unlike its peers is The Children's Research and Education Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPregnancy Support ServicesElementary Literacy TutoringAnimal Rescue and ShelterOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersYouth Sports ProgramsMilitary Veterans SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Public Library OperationsLocal History MuseumsCommunity College Foundatio…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Banks and PantriesIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%16%20–35yr13%37%35–55yr16%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/132
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,433

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

126 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 126 of the 171 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
125/126
Grantees still filing
97/126
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE INC — $5,108,890 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE INCREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $1,200,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA — $1,149,205 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINABRAZELTON TOUCHPOINTS FOUNDATION — $702,000 · OtherBRAZELTON TOUCHPOINTS FOUNDATIONFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $660,500 · OtherFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND+91 more — $3,540,793 · Other+91 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,551,250 · HealthPLANNED PAREN…PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $401,000 · HealthPLANNED PAREN…MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $100,000 · Health+15 more — $349,000 · Health+15 moreWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $466,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNI…BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION — $419,000 · EducationBANK STREET …REACH OUT AND READ INC — $295,000 · EducationREACH OUT AN…DALTON SCHOOLS INC — $120,000 · EducationDALTON SCHOO…ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL — $120,000 · EducationETHICAL CULT…JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $105,000 · EducationWHEATON COLLEGE — $95,000 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGE — $85,000 · EducationSHADY HILL SCHOOL — $83,500 · EducationTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE — $75,000 · Education+21 more — $339,900 · Education+21 moreCITIZEN OPINION INC — $800,000 · Public BenefitINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY — $396,138 · Public BenefitNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $982,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $390,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL COALITION AGAINST CENSORSHIP INC — $335,000 · Civil Rights+3 more — $37,000 · Civil RightsPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $230,500 · Arts & CultureMUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC — $115,000 · Arts & CultureNEWARK PUBLIC RADIO INC — $87,000 · Arts & CultureTHEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC — $85,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $59,500 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO — $29,000 · Arts & Culture+12 more — $69,796 · Arts & Culture
Other$12,361,388Health$2,401,250Education$2,203,400Public Benefit$1,196,138Philanthropy$982,000Civil Rights$762,000Arts & Culture$675,796

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE INC — $5,108,890 over 8y, 100% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $1,551,250 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $982,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITIZEN OPINION INC — $800,000 over 8y, 100% of budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $660,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $466,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION — $419,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC — $401,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetINSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY — $396,138 over 7y, 3.8% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $390,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGuttmacher Institute Inc — $350,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION AGAINST CENSORSHIP INC — $335,000 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE — $300,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetREACH OUT AND READ INC — $295,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $230,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC — $221,618 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $175,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBRAZELTON TOUCHPOINTS PROJECT INC — $150,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetSTREETSQUASH INC — $136,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL — $120,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC — $115,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetJOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $105,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHEATON COLLEGE — $95,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEWARK PUBLIC RADIO INC — $87,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetTHEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC — $85,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $85,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSHADY HILL SCHOOL — $83,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES — $81,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom to Read Foundation — $80,000 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetTHE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE — $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNew York University — $70,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetThink Small — $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOANALYTICAL TRAINING & RESEARCH INC — $62,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetCHILDREN OF BELLEVUE INC — $60,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $59,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCORNELL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $56,400 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetIPAS — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMILTON ACADEMY — $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERSIDE PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetGAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC — $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN SCIENCE CENTER — $40,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetJUVENILE LAW CENTER — $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $40,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST
  • Who funds CITIZEN OPINION INC
  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND
  • Who funds WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LEAGUE OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds INSTITUTE ON TAXATION AND ECONOMIC POLICY
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
  • Who funds Guttmacher Institute Inc
  • Who funds NATIONAL COALITION AGAINST CENSORSHIP INC
  • Who funds ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE
  • Who funds REACH OUT AND READ INC
  • Who funds PEN AMERICAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BRAZELTON TOUCHPOINTS PROJECT INC
  • Who funds STREETSQUASH INC
  • Who funds DALTON SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL
  • Who funds MUSIC AND DANCE THEATER CHICAGO INC
  • Who funds JOHN FITZGERALD KENNEDY LIBRARY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
  • Who funds MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
  • Who funds WHEATON COLLEGE
  • Who funds NEWARK PUBLIC RADIO INC
  • Who funds THEATRE FOR A NEW AUDIENCE INC
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE
  • Who funds SHADY HILL SCHOOL
  • Who funds ZERO TO THREE NATIONAL CENTER FOR INFANTS TODDLERS AND FAMILIES
  • Who funds Freedom to Read Foundation
  • Who funds THE ROOSEVELT INSTITUTE
  • Who funds New York University

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ford FoundationNY18.7× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Hopewell Fund · Boston Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · The Irving Harris Foundation · The Rockefeller Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · Freedom Together Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Meadows Road Foundation (Fka Coydog Foundation) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Clifford Beers Community Care Center Inc75% of income from government
  • Friends of Children Inc54% of income from government
  • Newark Public Radio Inc51% of income from government
  • Wild Salmon Center49% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Neighborhood Villages Inc33% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation23% of income from government
  • Connecticut Veterans Legal Center Inc12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc9% of income from government
  • Citizen Schools Inc8% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts Inc3% of income from government
  • The Family Center Inc3% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc2% of income from government
  • Wesleyan University1% of income from government
  • Lesley University1% of income from government
  • Wheaton College0% of income from government
  • Museum of Fine Arts0% of income from government
  • Milton Academy0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
26report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Meadows Road Foundation (Fka Coydog Foundation)?

Find your warmest path to Meadows Road Foundation (Fka Coydog Foundation) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 171 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph