Skip to content
McPartland Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

McPartland Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Philanthropy$126kHealth$50kYouth Development$28kEducation$25kAnimals$5kRecreation & Sports$5kHuman Services$5kReligion$5k
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$40,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$50,000
UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY$40,000
RAWHIDE YOUTH SERVICES$25,000
MAUI UNITED WAY$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%CAP SERVICES: $3k → 10%OPERATION BOOSTRAP: $3k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Association of United Ways Inc

Indiana united way is the leading voice to advocate, engage, and partner with a strong united way network and key stakeholders to advance human well-being throughout indiana.

Philanthropy
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Portal Inc

To enhance opportunities for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (i/dd) to participate fully in their community as valued neighbors, productive workers and respected citizens. portal, inc. assists more than 200 adults…

Employment
4
United Way Manitowoc County Inc

United way's mission is to improve lives.

Philanthropy
5
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
6
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
7
United Way of Wisconsin Inc

United way of wisconsin is dedicated to supporting and enriching a strong statewide united way network that maximizes the capacity of local united ways to address human needs, improve lives and create lasting positive change across…

Philanthropy
8
United Way of Genesee County

Build financial resources that enable investments in education, financial stability, health and basic needs addressing genesee county and surrounding areas most pressing challenges while building community-wide vitality.

Philanthropy
9
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
10
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
11
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
12
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Operation Bootstrap. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $101,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INCRAWHIDE INC: $25,000 · OtherRAWHIDE INCST STEPHENS CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC: $50,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY …MAUI UNITED WAY: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMAUI UNITED…HUMANE SOCIETY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $5,000 · AnimalsPGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsOPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $2,500 · Human ServicesCAP SERVICES INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $2,500 · Youth Development
Other$131,000Health$50,000Education$25,000Philanthropy$25,000Animals$5,000Recreation & Sports$5,000Human Services$5,000Youth Development$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $101,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAWHIDE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMAUI UNITED WAY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION BOOTSTRAP: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PORTAGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAP SERVICES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sentry Insurance Foun…Seramur Family Founda…Community Foundation …Peters Family Foundat…Edward J Okray Founda…Wisconsin Public Serv…Noel Family Foundatio…Delta Dental of Wisco…Herbert H Kohl Charit…The Blackbaud Giving …American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…
Sentry Insurance Foundation IncWI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sentry Insurance Foundation Inc · Seramur Family Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Central Wisconsin Inc · Peters Family Foundation Inc · Edward J Okray Foundation Inc · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Noel Family Foundation Inc · Delta Dental of Wisconsin Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McPartland Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McPartland Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McPartland Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home