Skip to content

· Private foundation

McDermott Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2018
17
Grants FY2018
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Education$21kHuman Services$19kHousing & Shelter$16kReligion$16kAnimals$9kFood & Nutrition$7kInternational$6kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2018 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOD FOR THE POOR$3,600
HUMANE SOCIETY - LOLLYPOP FARM$3,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$3,000
NATIVITY PREPARATORY ACADEMY$3,000
VETERANS OUTREACH CENTER INC$3,000
HOUSE OF MERCY$2,700
MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$2,500
ALFRED STATE COLLEGE$2,500
LIFESPAN$2,500
ST THOMAS MORE$2,000
WXXI PUBLIC BROADCASTING$1,500
OWEN'S HOUSE - CRISIS NURSERY OF GREATER ROCHESTER$1,500
ST MICHAEL'S WORKSHOP$1,500
DIOCESE OF VENICE IN FLORIDA$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SIS-SUSTAIN INSPIRE SURVIVE: $1k → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $4k → 14%HOUSE OF MERCY: $3k → 14%ROCHESTER PRESBYTERIAN HOME: $3k → 14%LIFESPAN: $5k → 14%LIFESPAN: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$75k · 16 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +91% since the first grant, against +81% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

$75k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+91%
+81%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Human ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterEducationArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LIFESPAN OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k · revenue +91%
  • HOUSE OF MERCY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +135%
  • Veterans Outreach Center Inc
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • FC
    FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +203%
  • UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +81%
  • RP
    Rochester Presbyterian Home Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rochester General Health System

Rochester general health system, provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.

Health
2
Unity Health System Inc

Unity health system inc. provides patient care, senior housing, laboratory services, and community outreach to residents and other clients in monroe county, new york and several surrounding counties.

Health
3
Rochester Friendly Home

The friendly home is a non-profit, non-denominational 200 bed nursing care and rehabilitation facility for older adults. located at 3156 east avenue in brighton, the friendly home offers a variety of health care services including 24-hour…

Health
4
Hospice of Michigan Inc

Hospice of Michigan, Inc. meets our patients and families where they are with urgency, purpose and compassionate accountability surrounding them with decades of dedicated hospice expertise.

Human Services
5
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
6
Rochester Oasis

To promote successful aging for adults age 50 and older through lifelong learning, health programs and volunteer engagement. our vision is that adults age 50 plus have opportunities to pursue vibrant, healthy, productive and meaningful…

—
7
East House Corporation

To provide residential, rehabilitation and support services in the rochester, ny area to adults recovering from major mental illnesses, chemical dependency and other disabling conditions.

Health
8
The Community Hospice Inc

We, st. peter's health partners and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. the community hospice is a member of st. peter's health partners…

Human Services
9
United Memorial Medical Center Foundation Inc

To raise and manage funds in support of united memorial medical center and it's affiliates.

Health
10
Rochester General College of Health Careers

The rochester general college of health careers is dedicated to preparing adult learners with the knowledge, skills, and competencies necessary to pursue health careers, advanced education, and lifelong learning.

Education
11
Hebrew Health Care Inc

The mission of hebrew health care is to provide highly personalized quality programs and services to the seniors of our community. we assure dignified, informed, quality care to all regardless of source of payment for services. (see…

Health
12
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Rochester. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUMANE SOCIETY - LOLLYPOP FARM: $6,500 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY - LOLLYPOP FARMST THOMAS MORE: $6,000 · OtherST THOMAS MOREVeterans Outreach Center Inc: $6,000 · OtherVeterans Outreach Center IncNATIVITY PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $6,000 · OtherNATIVITY PREPARATORY ACADEMYMONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $5,000 · OtherMONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGEALFRED STATE COLLEGE: $5,000 · OtherALFRED STATE COLLEGESAINT CATHERINE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3,000 · OtherSAINT CATHERINE CATHOLIC CHURCHDIOCESE OF VENICE IN FLORIDA INC: $2,000 · OtherROCHESTER WOMAN'S FOUNDATION: $2,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF ROCHESTER: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherRetirement Home For Horses Inc: $2,000 · Other+7 more: $6,350 · Other+7 moreLIFESPAN OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesLIFESPAN OF GREATER…HOUSE OF MERCY INC: $6,200 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF MERCY INCRochester Presbyterian Home Inc: $3,000 · Human ServicesRochester Presbyter…Sustain Inspire Survive: $1,000 · Human ServicesSustain Inspire Sur…FOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $6,800 · InternationalFOOD FOR THE …MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterFLOWER CIT…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $5,000 · EducationWXXI PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL: $3,000 · Arts & CultureST MICHAEL'S WOODSHOP INC: $3,000 · Religion
Other$53,850Human Services$17,700International$12,800Housing & Shelter$10,000Education$5,000Arts & Culture$3,000Religion$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLIFESPAN OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $6,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOUSE OF MERCY INC: $6,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVeterans Outreach Center Inc: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Presbyterian Home Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWXXI PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MICHAEL'S WOODSHOP INC: $3,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetRetirement Home For Horses Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSustain Inspire Survive: $1,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLOWER CITY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESPAN OF GREATER ROCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Outreach Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Presbyterian Home Inc ↗
  • Who funds WXXI PUBLIC BROADCASTING COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds ST MICHAEL'S WOODSHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds Retirement Home For Horses Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sustain Inspire Survive ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rochester Area Community FoundationNY25.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rochester Area Community Foundation · Esl Charitable Foundation · Daisy Marquis Jones Foundation · Rochester Area Community Foundation Depository Inc · United Way of Greater Rochester and the Finger Lakes Inc · Charles J & Burton S August Family Foundation · Greater Rochester Health Foundation · Max and Marian Farash Charitable Foundation · Alstom Signaling Foundation Inc · The Bernard and Patricia Iacovangelo Family Foundation Inc · Finger Lakes Area Community Endowment · William & Sheila Konar Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McDermott Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McDermott Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McDermott Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph