Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mayer Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$650
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
2
States reached
$550
Largest
01What you fund
0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172022.

Religion$19kHuman Services$6kArts & Culture$300Crime & Legal$300Education$200Health$150Youth Development$100Other$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$550
Median grant
2
States reached
$633k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Anselm Church$550
Girl Scouts of America$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Sophia Institute: $250 → 12%Catholic Charities: $3k → 17%MAx Cure Foundation: $50 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
OH
NJ
CA
KY
SC
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$63k · 8 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
46

Total granted

$63k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+19%

Still filing today

13%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $650 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesReligionArts & CultureCrime & LegalEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2020 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2021 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2019–2020 · $4k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
  • ST
    Susan Tassone Ministries - Cleve Disoese
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FM
    Franciscian Mission
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Diocese of Cleveland Facilities Services Corporation

To provide leadership and expertise in the planning, construction management, construction financing, maintenance and renovation of the buildings in which the charitable activities of catholic charities corporation occur.

2
Catholic Community Foundation

Catholic community foundation's mission is to foster faith-based stewardship in the community for spiritual, educational and charitable benefit for all.

3
Catholic Social Services Inc

Motivated by faith, catholic social services helps poor and vulnerable seniors and families reach their potential.

Human Services
4
The Foundation of the Catholic Diocese of Columbus

Support of religious, educational, and charitable activities in furtherance of the catholic church and catholic diocese of columbus.

Religion
5
Cathedral Latin Alumni Association Inc

To support the education of students of cathedral latin.

Education
6
Catholic Mission Network

Assisting bishops, pastors, and parishioners by developing and providing effective programs and resources grounded in gospel values, addressing an urgent need for evangelization within the church.

Religion
7
Mercy College of Ohio

Mercy College, a Catholic institution with a focus on healthcare, educates and inspires students to lead and serve in the global community.

Health
8
Catholic Answers Inc

Catholic answers is an apostolate dedicated to serving christ by bringing the fullness of catholic truth to the world. we help good catholics become better catholics, bring former catholics home, and lead non-catholics into the fullness of…

9
Catholic Investment Services Inc

To promote socially responsible investments in accordance with socially responsible investment guidelines published by the roman catholic bishops of the united states for institutions, provide education about socially responsible investing…

Public Benefit
10
Mount St Joseph University

Mount st. joseph university is a catholic academic community grounded in the spiritual values and vision of its founders, the sisters of charity. the university educates its students through interdisciplinary liberal arts and professional…

Education
11
St Peter the Rock Media

The mission of st. peter the rock media is to provide quality programming that is faithful to the teachings of the catholic church and presented in a way that inspires conversion of heart and a deepening of faith while building up the…

Religion
12
Inside Catholicism Inc

The corporation is organized exclusively for charitable, religious and education purposes to promote insights into the catholic church and its minsitries

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Corporation and the most unlike its peers is John Carroll University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $5,350 · OtherSusan Tassone Ministries - Cleve Disoese — $5,000 · OtherFranciscian Mission — $4,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,600 · Other+43 more — $19,085 · Other+43 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION — $3,200 · Human ServicesTHE SOPHIA INSTITUTE — $250 · Human Services+1 more — $50 · Human ServicesOur Sunday Visitor Inc — $1,644 · ReligionTHE SANCTUARY MUSEUM INC — $300 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF WOMENSAFE INC — $300 · Crime & LegalJohn Carroll University — $100 · Education
Other$107,535Human Services$3,500Religion$1,644Arts & Culture$300Crime & Legal$300Education$100

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION — $3,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOur Sunday Visitor Inc — $1,644 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SANCTUARY MUSEUM INC — $300 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF WOMENSAFE INC — $300 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJohn Carroll University — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MAX CURE FOUNDATION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES CORPORATION
  • Who funds Our Sunday Visitor Inc
  • Who funds THE SANCTUARY MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF WOMENSAFE INC
  • Who funds THE SOPHIA INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mayer Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph