Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mayer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Human Services$36kHealth$13kEnvironment$6kArts & Culture$5kEducation$4kAnimals$4kReligion$3kCrime & Legal$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k36 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$250
Median grant
11
States reached
$245k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANCHOR HOUSE$15,000
WALNUT RUN ANIMAL SANCTUARY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
PENN MEDICINE$1,000
COUNTY THEATER$1,000
THE SATANIC TEMPLE$1,000
NPR$865
NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER$750
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$750
BUCKS COUNTY FREE LIBRARY$600
PBS FOUNDATION$500
ACME SCREENING ROOM$500
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$500
TREVOR PROJECT$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AVOW HOSPICE: $100 → 10%ANCHOR HOUSE: $15k → 11%ANCHOR HOUSE: $10k → 11%ANCHOR HOUSE: $10k → 11%NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER: $750 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$72k · 24 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
18

Total granted

$72k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

54%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ANCHOR HOUSE INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +47%
  • CT
    COUNTY THEATER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $2k · revenue +30%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • PP
    PREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue +28%
  • GF
    GIVEWELL FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $410
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
2
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
3
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
4
Naples Zoo Inc

Naples zoo is accredited by the american zoo & aquarium association (aza) and has numerous animal exhibits placed on its 45-acre site. (continued on schedule o)each exhibit is unique and designed to simulate typical conditions for the…

Animals
5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
Zoological Society of Philadelphia

At philadelphia zoo, our mission is to flourish as an urban oasis, where people and animals thrive, transformational memories are made, and our passion for conservation saves wildlife (see schedule o).guided by a three-year strategic plan,…

Animals
7
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
8
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
9
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
10
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
11
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Multiple Sclerosis Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
16/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ANCHOR HOUSE INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesANCHOR HOUSE INC+2 more: $850 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $4,737 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $4,513 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODPENN MEDICINE: $4,100 · OtherPENN MEDICINESATANIC TEMPLE: $3,345 · OtherSATANIC TEMPLEGERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOL: $2,750 · OtherGERMANTOWN FRIENDS SCHOOLWALNUT RUN ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1,700 · OtherALLIANCE FOR INTNL REFORESTATION GUATEMALA: $1,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF OPEN SPACE: $1,250 · Other+33 more: $10,345 · Other+33 moreCOUNTY THEATER INC: $2,350 · Arts & CultureACME SCREENING ROOM: $800 · Arts & CulturePBS FOUNDATION: $500 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA FILM SOCIETY: $200 · Arts & CultureTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,950 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,400 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $2,000 · AnimalsANIMAL ALLIANCE INC: $350 · AnimalsINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $295 · AnimalsPET PARTNERS: $250 · AnimalsWOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $250 · AnimalsBUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $200 · AnimalsOLIGO NATION: $750 · HealthNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $450 · HealthWILDLIFE CENTER FRIENDS INC: $750 · Public Benefit
Human Services$35,850Other$34,240Arts & Culture$3,850Civil Rights$3,350Animals$3,345Health$1,200Public Benefit$750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANCHOR HOUSE INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOUNTY THEATER INC: $2,350 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,950 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY FREE LIBRARY: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACME SCREENING ROOM: $800 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER FRIENDS INC: $750 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOLIGO NATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL ALLIANCE INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $295 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $290 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPET PARTNERS: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SENTENCING PROJECT: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN'S HUMANE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPIN SCHOOL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUCKS COUNTY SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA FILM SOCIETY: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANCHOR HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNTY THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds BUCKS COUNTY FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds ACME SCREENING ROOM ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CENTER FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds OLIGO NATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONALITIES SERVICE CENTER OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds PBS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE CONSERVANCY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PET PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN NEAR EAST REFUGEE AID ↗
  • Who funds THE SENTENCING PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS SELECT SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Robert Wood Johnson FoundationNJ21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Cigna Group Foundation · Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mayer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mayer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Anchor House Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Avow Hospice Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 59 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mayer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph