Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maxine E Spitler Foundation % Rita M Kocher

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$33k
Granted FY2026still arriving
16
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$72kArts & Culture$52kRecreation & Sports$41kAnimals$24kYouth Development$21kFood & Nutrition$12kPhilanthropy$12kScience & Tech$4kOther$0
02FY2026 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,900
Median grant
1
States reached
$696k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST THOMAS SCHOOL$5,790
KID SHOPPING DAY OF LAWRENCE COUNTY$5,000
LAWRENCE CO HUMANE SOCIETY$2,900
SAVED BY GRACE ANIMAL RESCUE$2,900
JASPER COUNTY BOYS & GIRLS PARK$2,729
JASPER COUNTY CUSD1$2,590
JASPER COUNTY CUSD1 READ PROGRAM$2,000
LAWRENCE COUNTY CUSD 20$1,900
JASPER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$1,239
LAWRENCE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT$1,000
ERBA JASPER COUNTY OFFICE$1,000
JASPER COUNTY CUSD1$999
LAWRENCE COUNTY ARTS COUNCIL$770
RED HILL CUSD10$660
RED HILL CUSD10$588
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY26–26, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KID SHOPPING DAY OF LAWRENCE COUNTY: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$195k · 13 repeat orgs$70k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
37

Total granted

$195k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+40%

Still filing today

8%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
AnimalsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JASPER COUNTY CUSD1
    9× · 2018–2026 · $45k
  • ST
    ST THOMAS SCHOOL
    8× · 2018–2026 · $39k
  • RH
    RED HILL CUSD10
    6× · 2021–2026 · $30k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • (C
    (15)LAWRENCE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • LC
    LAWRENCE COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JASPER COUNTY CUSD1: $45,082 · OtherJASPER COUNTY CUSD1ST THOMAS SCHOOL: $38,716 · OtherST THOMAS SCHOOLRED HILL CUSD10: $29,798 · OtherRED HILL CUSD10JASPER COUNTY BOYS AND GIRLS PARK: $26,336 · OtherJASPER COUNTY BOYS AND GIRLS PARKLAWRENCE CO HUMANE SOCIETY: $18,250 · OtherLAWRENCE CO HUMANE SOCIETYJASPER COUNTY CUSD 1 READ PROGRAM: $12,500 · Other+44 more: $82,764 · Other+44 moreSOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,799 · PhilanthropyKIDS SHOPPING DAY OF LAWRENCE COUNTY: $5,000 · Human ServicesLAWRENCE COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $2,793 · HealthLAWRENCE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,750 · AnimalsEMBARRAS RIVER BASIN AGENCY INC: $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$253,446Philanthropy$11,799Human Services$5,000Health$2,793Animals$2,750Community Improvement$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJASPER COUNTY BOYS AND GIRLS PARK: $26,336 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,799 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL: $2,793 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,750 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetLAWRENCE COUNTY FARM BUREAU: $1,088 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetEMBARRAS RIVER BASIN AGENCY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JASPER COUNTY BOYS AND GIRLS PARK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN ILLINOIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds KIDS SHOPPING DAY OF LAWRENCE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE COUNTY FARM BUREAU ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orell Farley Foundation %Melisa Griffith Trust Officer PsbIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orell Farley Foundation %Melisa Griffith Trust Officer Psb · Mary Heath Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maxine E Spitler Foundation % Rita M Kocher funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maxine E Spitler Foundation % Rita M Kocher. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Maxine E Spitler Foundation % Rita M Kocher?

    Find your warmest path to Maxine E Spitler Foundation % Rita M Kocher through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maxine E Spitler Foundation % Rita M Kocher’s filings →

    More from the funding graph