Skip to content

· Private foundation

Max Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$121kReligion$114kRecreation & Sports$50kInternational$49kHuman Services$36kPhilanthropy$20kHealth$18kYouth Development$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
$1,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$543k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUASIMONDO INC$32,450
MILWAUKEE TURNERS INC$10,000
CONGREGATION BETH YEHUDAH$10,000
CHILDREN'S HOME OF HAITI INC$10,000
HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY CENTER$5,000
CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION$5,000
CONGREGATION SHIR HADASH$2,360
CHABAD OF DOWNTOWN$1,900
CONGREGATION NEVEI KODESH$1,800
THE OPTIMIST THEATRE$1,800
THE SHALOM CENTER$1,800
AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC$1,000
NICE PLAYS INC$1,000
HARRY & ROSE SAMSON FAMILY CENTER$439
CREATE WISCONSIN$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE JUNIOR COUNCIL: $655 → 14%FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR: $6k → 10%FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR: $2k → 10%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $1k → 17%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $516 → 17%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $500 → 17%VOCES DE LA FRONTERA: $30 → 17%SOLES FOR JESUS: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$357k · 37 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
52

Total granted

$357k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+6%

Still filing today

54%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MILWAUKEE TURNERS INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $21k · revenue +293%
  • Optimist Theatre
    5× · 2017–2025 · $11k · revenue +4%
  • BC
    BAJA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +371%

Funded once

  • JS
    J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +24%
  • FA
    FRACTURED ATLAS INC (SILLSSPOLIN THEATER WORKS)
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • MILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD
    one grant, 2023 · $4k · revenue -57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Radio Milwaukee Inc

To reach a new generation of radio listeners on air, online and in the community with a compelling selection of music and public affairs programming. the corporation celebrates milwaukee music, arts, heritage, and culture by supporting and…

Arts & Culture
2
Milwaukee Women Inc

Milwaukee women inc is an organization of executives determined to change the quality and composition of corporate boards to maximize the performance of public and private companies with a focus on women and women of color.

Education
3
Wisconsin Policy Forum Inc

We conduct impartial public policy research and analysis to drive informed debate and effective decision-making in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
4
J Street

To organize pro-israel, pro-peace, pro-democracy americans to promote us policies that embody our deeply held jewish and democratic values and that help secure the state of israel as a democratic homeland for the jewish people.

International
5
Theaterworks Inc

Theaterworks' mission is to share intimate stories that engage all audiences. it creates exceptional contemporary theater that entertains, celebrates new voices, and invites meaningful conversations. its vision is to inspire a more…

Arts & Culture
6
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
7
En Garde Arts Inc

To produce bold theatre experiences that reach across artistic, physical and social boundries. We aim to increase empathy and open-mindedness by illuminating nuanced perspectives and unspoken truths behind the salient issues of our time.…

Arts & Culture
8
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture
9
Artworks for Milwaukee Inc

ArtWorks mission is preparing youth for tomorrow by providing transferable career skills through arts internships today. More than 1,450 high school students have completed ArtWorks internships since our inception.

Arts & Culture
10
Aids Foundation of Chicago

The aids foundation of chicago mobilizes communities to create equity and justice for people living with and vulnerable to hiv and related chronic disease.

Health
11
The American Theatre Guild

The american theatre guild is dedicated to providing the experience of live theatre to foster passion, inspire creativity and empower youth within our communities.

Arts & Culture
12
Milwaukee Repertory Theater Inc

The organization ignites positive change in the cultural, social and economic vitality of its community by creating world-class theater experiences that entertain, provoke and inspire meaningful dialogue among an audience representative of…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milwaukee Art Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/64
Grantees still filing
36/64
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARLINS FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherMARLINS FOUNDATIONCHABAD OF DOWNTOWN LTD: $34,620 · OtherCHABAD OF DOWNTOWN LTDMILWAUKEE TURNERS INC: $20,700 · OtherMILWAUKEE TURNERS INCLive Oak Institute: $20,000 · OtherLive Oak InstituteCONGREGATION SHIR HADASH: $19,490 · OtherCONGREGATION SHIR HADASHARSHA-VIDYA-PITAM: $16,500 · OtherARSHA-VIDYA-PITAMFIRST STAGE CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $14,500 · OtherTHE SHALOM CENTER: $12,472 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH YEHUDAH: $10,000 · Other+42 more: $74,827 · Other+42 moreQUASIMONDO INC: $40,949 · Arts & CultureQUASIMONDO INCOptimist Theatre: $10,660 · Arts & CultureOptimist TheatreCHILDREN'S HOME OF HAITI INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S HOME OF H…STORYTELLER PROJECT: $3,800 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD: $3,600 · Arts & Culture+9 more: $11,685 · Arts & Culture+9 moreYOUTHAITI INC: $12,875 · InternationalYOUTHAITI I…BAJA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,436 · InternationalBAJA COMMUN…FRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA: $7,550 · InternationalFRIENDS OF …NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC: $7,000 · InternationalNEW JEWISH …NEW ISRAEL FUND: $3,800 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JOURNEY HOUSE ACTIONS RWANDA INC: $2,600 · InternationalAMERICAN FR…AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 · International+3 more: $1,300 · InternationalMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $10,032 · PhilanthropyTHE INTERCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,710 · PhilanthropyTHE HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION: $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE AMY BIEHL FOUNDATION: $1,760 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $1,030 · PhilanthropyACTBLUE CHARITIES INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICA GIVES INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $110 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR: $7,300 · Human ServicesVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC: $2,046 · Human ServicesJUNIOR COUNCIL: $655 · Human Services+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · HealthAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · Health+5 more: $845 · HealthJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $5,000 · ReligionTikkun Ha-Ir of Milwaukee Inc: $743 · Religion+1 more: $180 · Religion
Other$273,109Arts & Culture$80,694International$46,811Philanthropy$21,642Human Services$10,101Health$9,345Religion$5,923

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetQUASIMONDO INC: $40,949 over 5y, 15% of budgetMILWAUKEE TURNERS INC: $20,700 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetLive Oak Institute: $20,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetOptimist Theatre: $10,660 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $10,032 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME OF HAITI INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBAJA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $9,436 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA: $7,550 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR: $7,300 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC: $7,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION: $5,550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJ STREET EDUCATION FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTORYTELLER PROJECT: $3,800 over 2y, 15% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $3,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,710 over 4y, 17% of budgetMILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD: $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JOURNEY HOUSE ACTIONS RWANDA INC: $2,600 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIN TANDEM THEATRE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEXT ACT THEATRE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCREATE WISCONSIN INC: $2,360 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $2,207 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOCES DE LA FRONTERA INC: $2,046 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN PUBLIC RADIO ASSOCIATION INC: $1,130 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKAYENTA ARTS FOUNDATION: $1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAW FORWARD INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEVA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY LORE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH IN FOCUS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetACTBLUE CHARITIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTikkun Ha-Ir of Milwaukee Inc: $743 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetJUNIOR COUNCIL: $655 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHEATRE GIGANTE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FUND FOR CHARITIES: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRENAISSANCE THEATERWORKS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEaster Seals Southeast Wisconsin Inc: $430 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUNG CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROOTS ETHIOPIA INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC: $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BLACK WOMEN'S WELLNESS INC: $185 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds QUASIMONDO INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE TURNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Live Oak Institute ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds Optimist Theatre ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME OF HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds BAJA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF GIVAT HAVIVA ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CASA HOGAR ↗
  • Who funds NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S OUTING ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds J STREET EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds STORYTELLER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE INTERCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE CHAMBER THEATRE LTD ↗
  • Who funds THE HIDE AND SEEK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JOURNEY HOUSE ACTIONS RWANDA INC ↗
  • Who funds IN TANDEM THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEXT ACT THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds CREATE WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Herbert H Kohl Charities IncWI36.2× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Milwaukee Jewish Federation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · United Performing Arts Fund Inc · Richard and Ethel Herzfeld Foundation Inc · Gardner Foundation · Bert L and Patricia S Steigleder Charitable · Youth Foundation Inc · Briggs & Stratton Corporation Foundation Inc · Peck Foundation Milwaukee Ltd · Dorothy Inbusch Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Max Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Max Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Max Fund Inc?

Find your warmest path to Max Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 99 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Max’s filings →

More from the funding graph