· Private foundation
Max and Bertha Dressler Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ROXBURY LAND TRUST | $15,000 |
| REED COLLEGE | $15,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $2,250 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND | $2,250 |
| AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA | $2,000 |
| PARTNERSHIP WITH NATIVE AMERICANS | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
14 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- RLROXBURY LAND TRUST INC8× · 2017–2025 · $63k · revenue +295%
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +41%
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED6× · 2018–2025 · $13k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- SCSIERRA CLUB JOHN MUIR SOCIETYone grant, 2021 · $2k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $1k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)
The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.
To research and develop centrist policy ideas.
Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…
Shape and drive bold policy solutions to achieve equitable carbon-neutral economies.
The 5 Gyres Institute (5 Gyres) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in Los Angeles, with a global network of supporters united in the pursuit of a planet free of plastic pollution. 5 Gyres' mission is to empower action against the…
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Increase societal understanding of the earth system through scientific research and education.
The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.
Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.
The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…
How this is measured
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ROXBURY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds REED INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Partnership With Native Americans ↗
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Max and Bertha Dressler Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Max and Bertha Dressler Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Reed Institute: 1% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Max and Bertha Dressler Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Max and Bertha Dressler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Max and Bertha Dressler’s filings →