Skip to content
Maury Regional Heathcare Foundation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Maury Regional Heathcare Foundation

Charitable and educational services within the communities served by maury regional hospital.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Health$150kYouth Development$110kRecreation & Sports$50kFood & Nutrition$25kHuman Services$22kReligion$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kCrime & Legal$10k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $125,250, the rows itemized in this filing. The $134,615 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,365 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $119k
$16,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF MAURY COUNTY$40,000
UNITED STROKE ALLIANCE$23,250
MAURY COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT$20,000
NURSES FOR NEWBORNS$16,000
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$10,000
KID'S PLACE$10,000
THE FAMILY CENTER$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $16k → 14%NURSES FOR NEWBORNS MAURY COUNTY: $9k → 14%THE FAMILY CENTER: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

58%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$235k · 4 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$235k
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $36k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN
    3× · 2023–2025 · $110k · revenue -11%
  • US
    UNITED STROKE ALLIANCE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $80k · revenue +35%
  • NF
    NURSES FOR NEWBORNS
    2× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • ML
    MIRACLE LEAGUE OF COLUMBIA AT MAURY COUNTY PARK
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -40%
  • TW
    THE WELL OUTREACH INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue +25%
  • DR
    Duck River Dental Outreach
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · 32% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Maury Volunteer Fire & Rescue

To provide fire protection & rescue services for the maury area of greene county through the services of volunteers.

—
2
Mission Dental Virginia Inc
Health
3
Mountain Region Speech and Hearing Center

To provide infants, children, and adults of NE Tennessee and SW Virginia with the hightest quality and cost effective evaluation, treatment, and education for speech, language, hearing and swallowing disorders regardless of an individuals…

Health
4
Centerview Volunteer Fire Department Inc

Centerview Volunteer Fire Department is dedicated to serving the citizens of Cocke County Tennessee and its visitors. We respond to 911 calls for service that include Fires, Car Wrecks, Medical Emergencies, and other emergent situations.

Health
5
Mcminn County Emergency Rescue Squad

The rescue squad is established to operate and maintain a volunteer emergency and rescue squad for mcminn county and to render service and aid upon the occurrence of accidents or emergencies in mcminn county, tn and/or other areas when…

Health
6
Friends in Need Health Center Inc

To provide professional medical and dental healthcare to the uninsured and under-insured of Northeast Tennessee and Southwest VA

Health
7
Marion Co Community Ministry I

Minister to the poor and needy of marion co tn

Food & Nutrition
8
Grundy County Food Bank

Charitable - free distribution of food to those in need

Food & Nutrition
9
Morristown Emergency Rescue Squad

Volunteer search & rescue

—
10
Savannah Volunteer Dental Clinic Inc

Since 2008, the savannah volunteer dental clinc has served chatham county and the surrounding area's most vulnerable population. providing over 1 million of dental care and services to at risk children and adults of eligible low income…

Health
11
Revive Dental Tennessee

To provide high quality dental work at a low cost to low income households.

Health
12
Appalachian Miles for Smiles

To provide quality dental care and eye examinations at no cost to uninsured residents of east tennessee and southwest virginia

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Central Family Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is United Stroke Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CE…UNITED STROKE ALLIANCE: $80,000 · EducationUNITED STROKE ALLIANCEMIRACLE LEAGUE OF COLUMBIA AT MAURY COUNTY PARK: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsMIRACLE LEAGU…COLUMBIA FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA FIRST UNITED M…MARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER: $14,950 · OtherMARSHALL MEDICAL CENTERNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $10,000 · OtherNURSES FOR NEWBORNSMAURY COUNTY FIRE & RESCUE INC: $20,000 · OtherMAURY COUNTY FIRE & RES…GIVING SMILES: $10,800 · OtherGIVING SMILESKIDS PLACE A CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,000 · OtherKIDS PLACE A CHILD ADVO…NURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $25,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTHE WELL OUTREACH INC: $25,000 · Food & NutritionDuck River Dental Outreach: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Youth Development$110,000Education$80,000Recreation & Sports$50,000Other$85,750Human Services$31,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Philanthropy$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SOUTH CENTRAL TENN: $110,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED STROKE ALLIANCE: $80,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF COLUMBIA AT MAURY COUNTY PARK: $50,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetNURSES FOR NEWBORNS: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WELL OUTREACH INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDuck River Dental Outreach: $25,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetKIDS PLACE A CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL FAMILY CENTER INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundat…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maury Regional Heathcare Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maury Regional Heathcare Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maury Regional Heathcare’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home