Skip to content
Maurice Michelle Taylor Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Maurice Michelle Taylor Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$244kEducation$188kSocial Science$25kRecreation & Sports$17kReligion$5kYouth Development$4kFood & Nutrition$3kCommunity Improvement$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GROSSE POINTE ACADEMY$5,000
THE HOLLEY FAMILY VILLAGE INC$5,000
CARING ATHLETES TEAM FOR CHILDRENS$4,000
THE HOLLEY INSTITUTE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 77% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VARIETY - THE CHILDREN'S CHARITY: $10k → 11%TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTHERN CA INC: $2k → 11%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $75k → 14%TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $3k → 10%ROSE HILL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%CHARLEVOIX COUNTY JR GOLF ASSOC: $1k → 9%ARSENAL OF DEMOCRACY CHAPTER: $1k → 10%MICHIGAN TECH FUND: $10k → 14%RAQUET UP DETROIT: $1k → 21%BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHARITABLE T: $120k → 13%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $2k → 10%ROSE HILL FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%CHARLEVOIX COUNTY JR GOLF ASSOC: $1k → 9%ASSUMPTION GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH: $5k → 10%RAQUET UP DETROIT: $1k → 21%CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $23k → 14%TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $2k → 10%BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $100k → 8%CARING ATHLETES TEAM FOR CHILDRENS: $4k → 21%TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $2k → 10%BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN: $2k → 21%TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $2k → 10%CAPUCHIN SOUP KITCHEN: $1k → 21%BLUE GAVEL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $5k → 10%GROSSE POINTE ACADEMY: $20k → 21%BLUE GAVEL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $2k → 10%THE HOLLEY INSTITUTE: $14k → 21%BLUE GAVEL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $2k → 10%GROSSE POINTE ACADEMY: $13k → 21%BLUE GAVEL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $1k → 10%GROSSE POINTE ACADEMY: $10k → 21%THE HOLLEY INSTITUTE: $10k → 21%THE HELM: $6k → 21%GROSSE POINTE ACADEMY: $5k → 21%THE HOLLEY FAMILY VILLAGE INC: $5k → 21%THE HOLLEY INSTITUTE: $2k → 21%GROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $1k → 21%GROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $1k → 21%THE HOLLEY INSTITUTE: $1k → 21%THE HOLLEY INSTITUTE: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$333k · 11 repeat orgs$163k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$333k
$154k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+8%
+16%

Still filing today

64%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $123k · revenue +3%
  • TG
    THE GROSSE POINTE ACADEMY
    4× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +88%
  • TC
    TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $11k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • BT
    BRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHARITABLE T
    one grant, 2017 · $120k
  • MT
    Michigan Tech Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +16%
  • VT
    Variety the Childrens Charity
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Glacier Hills Foundation

We, trinity senior living communities and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence in our communities.glacier hills foundation is a member of trinity health senior…

Housing & Shelter
2
Golf Gives Inc

The charity's mission is to provide scholarships and hardship grants to needy individuals and families within the golf community.

—
3
Chesapeake College Foundation Inc

The foundation is organized and operated exclusively for the charitable and educational purposes of furthering the educational programs, facilities, and opportunities at chesapeake college, by providing financial resources to meet the…

—
4
Hudson Valley Golf Foundation

To support wounded veterans, individuals with intellectual disabilities, and disadvantaged youth through golf; and to provide a platform for west point to showcase its golf program

Recreation & Sports
5
Gaston College Foundation

The mission of the gaston college foundation, inc. is to raise, invest, administer and disburse funds exclusively for charitable, scientific or educational purposes for the benefit of gaston college.

Education
6
Corewell Health Foundation West Michigan

Improve health, instill humanity and inspire hope.

Health
7
Greenville Country Club Scholarship Foundation

To identify qualified applicants in order to provide scholarship grants for advanced career educational opportunities that may otherwise go unfulfilled.

Education
8
Rose Hill Center Inc

To provide a residential psychiatric rehabilitation facility for adults with mental illness

Health
9
Cdu Foundation

The purpose of this corporation is to perform the charitable functions of and carry out the charitable purposes of charles r. drew university of medicine and science (cdu), a california nonprofit public benefit corporation. this…

Education
10
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
11
Minnesota Hospital Foundation

The minnesota hospital foundation works on strategies that include data-led quality and safety improvement, education, research, training and leadership to improve the health of minnesotans.

—
12
Hudson Valley Community College Foundation

To receive and maintain funds to aid and advance the welfare, development, purposes and programs of hudson valley community college, its students and alumni.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rose Hill Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Michigan Tech Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $123,025 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $101,500 · HealthBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATIONBRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHARITABLE T: $120,000 · OtherBRENT TAYLOR PERPETUAL CHARITABLE TTHE HOLLEY INSTITUTE: $27,808 · OtherTHE HOLLEY INSTITUTEVariety the Childrens Charity: $10,000 · OtherBLUE GAVEL SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $9,500 · Other+8 more: $23,200 · Other+8 moreTHE GROSSE POINTE ACADEMY: $48,000 · EducationTHE GROSSE POI…Michigan Tech Fund: $10,000 · EducationMichigan Tech …HOLLEY FAMILY VILLAGE INC: $5,000 · EducationHOLLEY FAMILY …TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $11,300 · Recreation & SportsRACQUET UP DETROIT: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsROSE HILL FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyGROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Health$224,525Other$190,508Education$63,000Recreation & Sports$13,300Philanthropy$2,500Community Improvement$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $123,025 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $101,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GROSSE POINTE ACADEMY: $48,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetTERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC: $11,300 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetMichigan Tech Fund: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLLEY FAMILY VILLAGE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetROSE HILL FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE GROSSE POINTE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds TERRA COTTA GOLF CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Michigan Tech Fund ↗
  • Who funds Variety the Childrens Charity ↗
  • Who funds HOLLEY FAMILY VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROSE HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RACQUET UP DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds GROSSE POINTE CHAMBER FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Donor Advised Charita…
Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maurice Michelle Taylor Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maurice Michelle Taylor Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maurice Michelle Taylor’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home