Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maurice&Dorothy Stubnitz Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$404k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$596kHuman Services$438kEducation$421kHousing & Shelter$344kEnvironment$225kRecreation & Sports$208kYouth Development$129kAnimals$125kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $194k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $142k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$75,000
HOPE CENTER$66,966
TECUMSEH CENTER FOR THE ARTS$30,000
LENAWEE HUMANE SOCIETY$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB$22,500
HOUSING HELP OF LENAWEE$18,929
CROSWELL OPERA HOUSE$17,733
THE DAILY BREAD OF LENAWEE$12,044
MANITOU BEACH HISTORIC SOCIETY$11,895
ADRIAN CENTER FOR THE ARTS$10,955
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,216
SHARE THE WARMTH$9,925
ASSOCIATED CHARITIES$7,500
ADRIAN EBEID NEIGHBOORHOOD PROMISE$5,646
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COMMUNITY LEARNING CONNECTIONS: $6k → 12%COMMUNITY LEARNING CONNECTIONS: $4k → 12%COMMUNITY LEARNING CONNECTIONS: $4k → 12%COMMUNITY LEARNING CONNECTIONS: $3k → 12%COMMUNITY LEARNING CONNECTIONS: $3k → 12%COMMUNITY LEARNING CONNECTIONS: $3k → 12%ASSOCIATED CHARITIES: $25k → 12%ASSOCIATED CHARITIES: $10k → 12%ASSOCIATED CHARITIES: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 34 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
9

Total granted

$2.7M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-12%

Still filing today

35%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +8%
  • LH
    Lenawee Humane Society
    7× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +140%
  • CO
    CROSWELL OPERA HOUSE & FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $109k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • TD
    THE DAMASCUS ROAD INC
    one grant, 2017 · $17k
  • MM
    MIRACLE MEADOWS RANCH
    one grant, 2019 · $13k
  • RR
    RIVER RAISIN RAGTIME REVUE
    one grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue -12%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visit Lenawee

To promote lenawee county as a destination providing contemporary amenities to transient guests in a historical and cultural setting for the economic benefit of the community.

—
2
Habitat for Humanity of Lenawee County

Home construction or renovation for low income individuals and families in Lenawee County

—
3
Lenawee Symphony Orchestra Inc

The aso is dedicated to the advancement of classical music appreciation by providing a variety of presentations including classical, pops, and family concerts.

—
4
Montessori Childrens House of Lenawee Inc

Education of young people in the Montessori method

Human Services
5
Habitat for Humanity of Lapeer - Tuscola

To eliminate sub-standard housing and homelessness from lapeer county.

—
6
Hospice Homes of Genesee and Lapeer Counties

To provide housing and end of life care and support to terminally ill individuals.

Human Services
7
Lenawee Council for the Visual Arts

The Lenawee Council for the Visual Arts is organized for educational and charitable purposes. Specifically, the L.C.V.A. is organized to provide opportunities for visual artists in Lenawee County Michigan, to foster pride and involvement…

Arts & Culture
8
Lenawee Economic Development Corp

to stimulate economic development, attract new businesses, grow established businesses and support entrepreneurial endeavors in Lenawee County

—
9
Tecumseh Chamber of Commerce

To promote lenawee area businesses

—
10
Lenawee County Mission

To bring hope to neighbors in need through a comprehensive suite of christ centered programs

Human Services
11
ShareCare of Leelanau Inc

To facilitate connecting the Leelanau county community of seniors with services and activities that promote a healthy independent and fulfilled lifestyle while aging.

Human Services
12
Leelanau Conservancy

To conserve the land, water and scenic character of leelanau county, and to provide educational programs to develop an understanding and appreciation of leelanau county's natural heritage.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lenawee Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Adrian Schools Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOPE CENTER INC: $357,443 · OtherHOPE CENTER INCIndividual grant recipient: $240,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $202,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHIDDEN LAKE GARDENS: $194,007 · OtherHIDDEN LAKE GARDENSIndividual grant recipient: $159,719 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS GIRLS CLUB: $129,090 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUBCATHERINE COBB SAFE HOUSE: $76,098 · Other+28 more: $591,927 · Other+28 moreSIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY: $149,552 · EducationADRIAN COLLEGE: $44,007 · EducationADRIAN REA LITERACY CENTER: $31,504 · EducationLENAWEE EMERGENCY AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORP: $108,501 · Housing & ShelterHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $89,531 · Housing & ShelterLenawee Humane Society: $125,196 · AnimalsCROSWELL OPERA HOUSE & FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $109,269 · Arts & CultureRIVER RAISIN RAGTIME REVUE: $12,500 · Arts & CultureSHARE THE WARMTH: $92,095 · Community ImprovementASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF LENAWEE COUNTY: $42,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY LEARNING CONNECTIONS INC: $20,975 · Human ServicesLENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $62,500 · Philanthropy
Other$1,950,784Education$225,063Housing & Shelter$198,032Animals$125,196Arts & Culture$121,769Community Improvement$92,095Human Services$63,475Philanthropy$62,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY: $149,552 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLenawee Humane Society: $125,196 over 7y, 4.1% of budgetCROSWELL OPERA HOUSE & FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION: $109,269 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetLENAWEE EMERGENCY AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORP: $108,501 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetSHARE THE WARMTH: $92,095 over 5y, 11% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $89,531 over 7y, 4.5% of budgetLENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $62,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetDAILY BREAD OF LENAWEE INC: $50,514 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetADRIAN COLLEGE: $44,007 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF LENAWEE COUNTY: $42,500 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetADRIAN SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $40,400 over 8y, 5.3% of budgetADRIAN REA LITERACY CENTER: $31,504 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY LEARNING CONNECTIONS INC: $20,975 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetTHE DAMASCUS ROAD INC: $17,198 over 1y, 18% of budgetRIVER RAISIN RAGTIME REVUE: $12,500 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF LENAWEE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH MICHIGAN FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIENA HEIGHTS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Lenawee Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds CROSWELL OPERA HOUSE & FINE ARTS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds LENAWEE EMERGENCY AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORP ↗
  • Who funds SHARE THE WARMTH ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds LENAWEE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAILY BREAD OF LENAWEE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADRIAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED CHARITIES OF LENAWEE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ADRIAN SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ADRIAN REA LITERACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY LEARNING CONNECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DAMASCUS ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds RIVER RAISIN RAGTIME REVUE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF LENAWEE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lenawee Community FoundationMI34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lenawee Community Foundation · Farver Foundation · Premier Bank Foundation · Tlc Community Credit Union · The S L Hickman Family Foundation · Douglas and Mary Kapnick Family Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Elizabeth Ruthruff Wilson Foundation · Bell Trust · Kiwanis Club of Adrian 2396 · The Robert E & Rosemary Price Foundation · Sage Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maurice&Dorothy Stubnitz Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maurice&Dorothy Stubnitz Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Maurice&Dorothy Stubnitz Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Maurice&Dorothy Stubnitz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maurice&Dorothy Stubnitz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph