Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Maureen and Paul Rubeli Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$311k
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.

Human Services$357kHealth$307kEducation$262kYouth Development$253kReligion$163kRecreation & Sports$112kFood & Nutrition$92kArts & Culture$63kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $166k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $145k
$7,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE CHILDREN'S ROOM$15,000
OAKWOOD SCHOOL$10,000
SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES$10,000
ANDRE HOUSE OF HOSPITALITY$10,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE$10,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$10,000
ARCHBISHOP STEPINAC HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
SOJOURNER CENTER$10,000
FRANCISCAN RENEWAL CENTER$10,000
ST JOSEPH THE WORKER$10,000
CASA FRANCISCANA OUTREACH$10,000
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE$10,000
LOS ENCINOS SCHOOL$10,000
HUMANAS$10,000
PATHFINDER RANCH$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $283k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%DIGNITY MATTERS: $5k → 11%WOUNDED WARRIERS FAMILY SUPPORT: $5k → 12%LAUGHING AT MY NIGHTMARES: $1k → 11%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%CORE (CHILDREN OF RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES): $5k → 8%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $1k → 9%HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $5k → 13%WOUNDED WARRIERS FAMILY SUPPORT: $5k → 12%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $5k → 20%WOUNDED WARRIERS FAMILY SUPPORT: $5k → 12%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $1k → 20%SOUTHERN NEVADA CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING: $3k → 13%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $37k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $25k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $25k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $15k → 8%OUR SPACE: $5k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $15k → 8%OUR SPACE: $5k → 8%THE CHILDREN'S ROOM: $15k → 8%NORTH VALLEY CARING SERVICES: $5k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA: $5k → 13%BLINDCONNECT INC: $5k → 13%BLINDCONNECT INC: $5k → 13%VISIONARY WOMEN: $5k → 14%VISIONARY WOMEN: $5k → 14%SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES: $10k → 11%SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES: $10k → 11%SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES: $10k → 11%SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES: $10k → 11%SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES: $10k → 11%SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES: $10k → 11%DELIVERING DREAMS OF ARIZONA: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 52 repeat orgs$238k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

52 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

52
34

Total granted

$1.5M
$142k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
0%

Still filing today

63%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children
    6× · 2020–2025 · $132k · revenue +50%
  • HI
    HUMANAS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +35% · 30% of their budget
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $70k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • GP
    GIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $15k
  • IA
    IN A PERFECT WORLD
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -15%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADAgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
4
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
5
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
6
Lifeworks Services Inc

Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.

Human Services
7
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
8
Children's Hospital Los Angeles

Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.

Health
9
The N 1 Collaborative Inc

To make individualized medicines routinely and rapidly accessible to rare disease patients worldwide.

Health
10
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
11
Lifestream Inc

Lifestream, inc. (the organization") provides community-based services that support individuals in attaining greater independence, promising opportunities, and lives that are meaningful and fulfilling on their own terms.

Health
12
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gilcrease Orchard Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsJewish Community Organizati…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Domestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and PantriesChristian Youth CampsMilitary Veterans SupportHealth Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Community Arts Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%5%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%13%10–20yr16%36%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%33%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/81
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,484

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/71
Grantees still filing
43/71
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARCHBISHOP STEPINAC HIGH SCHOOL — $105,000 · OtherARCHBISHOP STEPINAC HIGH SCHOOLFRANCISCAN RENEWAL CENTER INC — $90,000 · OtherFRANCISCAN RENEWAL CENTER INCHUMANAS INC — $75,000 · OtherHUMANAS INCANDRE HOUSE OF ARIZONA INC — $60,000 · OtherANDRE HOUSE OF ARIZONA INCCASA FRANCISCANA OUTREACH — $60,000 · OtherCASA FRANCISCANA OUTREACHSt Joseph the Worker — $60,000 · OtherSt Joseph the WorkerLOS ENCINOS SCHOOL — $43,500 · OtherHope Ignites Phoenix — $40,000 · OtherGILCREASE ORCHARD FOUNDATION — $34,500 · Other+48 more — $462,500 · Other+48 moreThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children — $132,250 · Human ServicesThe Childrens Room C…SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesSCOTTSDALE TRAINING …SOJOURNER CENTER — $35,000 · Human ServicesSOJOURNER CENTERWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesJOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION — $11,000 · Human Services+13 more — $74,500 · Human Services+13 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC — $70,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…Andson Inc — $31,500 · Youth DevelopmentAndson In…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GI…HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER BILLERICA INC — $5,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $31,500 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $25,000 · HealthHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthALS ONE INC — $7,500 · HealthSAMARITANS INC — $5,000 · HealthTHE PARMENTER FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · HealthMINDFUL YOUTH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Health+5 more — $11,500 · HealthPathfinder Ranch Inc — $45,000 · Recreation & SportsADAPTIVE SPORTS NEW ENGLAND INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER LAS VEGAS INNER CITY GAMES — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsXS Tennis and Education Foundation — $4,000 · Recreation & SportsESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $22,500 · EducationOAKWOOD SCHOOL — $10,000 · EducationWILDFLOWER INC — $7,500 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION — $7,500 · EducationCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION — $5,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $5,000 · EducationFAIR OPPORTUNITY PROJECT — $3,000 · EducationST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $60,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,030,500Human Services$327,750Youth Development$142,500Health$100,500Recreation & Sports$69,000Education$60,500Food & Nutrition$60,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children — $132,250 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetHUMANAS INC — $75,000 over 6y, 30% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC — $70,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSt Joseph the Worker — $60,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPathfinder Ranch Inc — $45,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ENCINOS SCHOOL — $43,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHope Ignites Phoenix — $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetSOJOURNER CENTER — $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGILCREASE ORCHARD FOUNDATION — $34,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $31,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAndson Inc — $31,500 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC — $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD CRISIS ARIZONA — $25,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetESPERANZA ACADEMY INC — $22,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES NOMADIC DIVISION — $17,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetAchilles International Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetADAPTIVE SPORTS NEW ENGLAND INC — $15,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetWest Fork Volunteer Fire Department — $14,500 over 5y, 31% of budgetJOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION — $11,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOAKWOOD SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISIONARY WOMEN — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetOur Space Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLINDCONNECT INC — $10,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetTHE BOSTON ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILDFLOWER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIN A PERFECT WORLD — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLIND CENTER OF NEVADA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LAS VEGAS INNER CITY GAMES — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR EDUCATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITANS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST WAY PREGNANCY CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEL VAZ PROJECTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetHELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJ CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDignity Matters Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children ↗
  • Who funds HUMANAS INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC ↗
  • Who funds SCOTTSDALE TRAINING & REHABILITATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds St Joseph the Worker ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds Pathfinder Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOS ENCINOS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Hope Ignites Phoenix ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNER CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GILCREASE ORCHARD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ANGEL FOOD ↗
  • Who funds Andson Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES NOMADIC DIVISION ↗
  • Who funds Achilles International Inc ↗
  • Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIORS FAMILY SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds ADAPTIVE SPORTS NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds West Fork Volunteer Fire Department ↗
  • Who funds JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Epilepsy Foundation of Arizona ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Virginia G Piper Char…Arizona Community Fou…Thunderbirds CharitiesCatholic Community Fo…Moreno Family Foundat…Garcia Family Foundat…Vegas Golden Knights …United Way of Souther…The Diane and Bruce H…GivenGain Foundation …Mgm Resorts FoundationNina Mason Pulliam Ch…
Virginia G Piper Charitable TrustAZ23.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Arizona Community Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Catholic Community Foundation for the Diocese of Phoenix · Moreno Family Foundation · Garcia Family Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · United Way of Southern Nevada · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · GivenGain Foundation USA · Mgm Resorts Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Maureen and Paul Rubeli Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Samaritans Inc — 31% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
  • Care Dimensions Inc — 14% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Als One Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines