Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mattleman Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$100k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$107kCivil Rights$8kHealth$6kEducation$6kHuman Services$4kFood & Nutrition$3kYouth Development$3kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOPE AND COMFORT: $1k → 7%JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $50 → 10%HOPE AND COMFORT: $1k → 7%ARLINGTON HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICE CHARITABLE CORP: $500 → 8%JUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $50 → 10%PROJECT HOME: $2k → 22%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENT: $100 → 16%UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENT: $75 → 16%GREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $500 → 14%CHARITY WATER: $200 → 17%PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH (PCCY): $300 → 22%PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH (PCCY): $300 → 22%PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH (PCCY): $300 → 22%PUBLIC CITIZENS FOR CHILDREN AND YOUTH (PCCY): $300 → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
VA
DC
AL
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Mattleman Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in PA; by stated purpose, 84%.

Mattleman Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$130k · 26 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 25 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
42

Total granted

$130k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+24%

Still filing today

65%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    5× · 2017–2021 · $4k · revenue +78%
  • Philabundance
    5× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +101%
  • HP
    HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA
    4× · 2017–2021 · $2k · revenue +474%

Funded once

  • PH
    PROJECT HOME
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -1%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA PARKINSON'S DISEASE MOVEMENT DISORDER CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
  • BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +58%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
2
Philadelphia Industrial Development Corporation

Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.

Community Improvement
3
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
4
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

—
5
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
6
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
7
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
The Philadelphia Education Fund

The mission of the philadelphia education fund (pef) is to create equitable access to opportunities for students by providing resources and expertise that build paths to college and career success. pef focuses on philadelphia public school…

Youth Development
10
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment
11
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Philadelphia Cultural Alliance; the most unlike its peers is Audrey Miller Poritzky Educational Fund for Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/48
Grantees still filing
32/48
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $106,000 · OtherFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION+38 more: $13,098 · Other+38 moreHOPE AND COMFORT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOME: $1,500 · Human ServicesChildren First PA: $1,200 · Human ServicesArlington HHS Charitable Corp: $500 · Human ServicesGREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $500 · Human Services+3 more: $475 · Human ServicesANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,075 · Civil RightsWOMEN'S LAW PROJECT: $200 · Civil RightsHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $2,200 · EducationPEGGY BROWNING FUND: $1,400 · EducationCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA: $300 · EducationSPELLS WRITING LAB INC: $175 · Education+3 more: $200 · EducationAFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES PARTNERSHIPS: $3,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $1,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA: $500 · HealthMOUNT AUBURN HOSPITAL: $500 · HealthLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $300 · HealthCOMMUNITY OF HOPE INCORPORATED: $250 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $125 · HealthPENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $100 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $100 · Health+1 more: $50 · HealthPhilabundance: $2,800 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $50 · Food & Nutrition
Other$119,098Human Services$6,175Civil Rights$4,275Education$4,275Youth Development$3,000Health$2,925Food & Nutrition$2,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFREE LIBRARY OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $106,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $4,075 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES PARTNERSHIPS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPhilabundance: $2,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA: $2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE AND COMFORT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEGGY BROWNING FUND: $1,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChildren First PA: $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER PHILADELPHIA CULTURAL ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEASTERN PA: $500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA READS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMake the Road New York: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArlington HHS Charitable Corp: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILADELPHIA BAIL FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT AUBURN HOSPITAL: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER DC DIAPER BANK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILADELPHIA PUBLIC SCHOOL NOTEBOOK: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING BEYOND BREAST CANCER: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRITEPATHS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS: $175 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHYY INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIQUON SCHOOL: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIGHTY WRITERS: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABOUT FRESH INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSPOETRY INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA22.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Independence Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The William Penn Foundation · Patricia & Stephen Segal Family Fdn · The Nararo Foundation · Future Standard Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · The Wawa Foundation Inc · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mattleman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mattleman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • City Year Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Mount Auburn Hospital: 5% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Hope and Comfort Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mattleman Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Mattleman Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mattleman Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph